On Jul 4, 2009, at 3:49 AM, Mark Polesky wrote:
> chip wrote:
>> Generally speaking, when it comes to Windows documentation - it
>> is almost always dummy proof. Showing every step one might come
>> across during the process. It applies to XP as that is what I
>> use, should apply equally to NT and 2000. Never seen ME, does
>> anyone actually use it? Vista has the same steps but a different
>> control panel. I don't have a Vista machine to get the exact
>> steps.
>
> Graham,
> I'm with Chip here. Explicit, unambiguous, fool-proof.
The question is whether these need to be on the Web page or in the
readme that accompanies the file when the user downloads it.
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@...
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user