Re:Trinidad test runner + Included pages

[unclebob]

>
> Trinidad test runner + Included pagesPosted by: "Halstead, Glenn  
> (E&T)" glenn.halstead@...  glenntdhalsteadTue Nov 3, 2009 8:49  
> am (PST)


> Originally we used the normal fitnesse test runner however we started
> getting memory failures if our test suites were to big. We moved to  
> the
> Trinidad test runner with Hudson because it resolved the memory  
> issues.
>


The memory problems with TestRunner have been resolved.  You could go  
back to using that if you like.  That's what I do.

----
Robert C. Martin (Uncle Bob)  | email: unclebob@...
Object Mentor Inc.            | blog:  blog.objectmentor.com
The Agile Transition Experts  | web:   www.objectmentor.com
800-338-6716                  | twitter: unclebobmartin

[Glenn Halstead]

--- In fitnesse@..., Robert Martin <UncleBob@...> wrote:

>
> The memory problems with TestRunner have been resolved.  You could go  
> back to using that if you like.  That's what I do.
>

Thanks Uncle Bob, I may do that.  One benefit I see from sticking with the Trinidad runner is that I can have multiple executors configured on one hudson slave without needing to manage what port the fitnesse service will start on.  I note that poster 'adoptablecoho' hasn't had trouble with includes when using Trinidad so I'll initially do some investigation there.