|
View:
New views
5 Messages
—
Rating Filter:
Alert me
|
|
|
Removal of CherryPy documentation on mod_wsgi site.I am removing many integration guides which appear on mod_wsgi site wiki and replacing them with links to any official documentation on the site the page was about. In others words, in your case to be replaced with a link to CherryPy documentation on how to use mod_wsgi with CherryPy. Can some one please look through: http://code.google.com/p/modwsgi/wiki/IntegrationWithCherryPy and copy from it into the CherryPy documentation anything relevant to your current CherryPy version you may want to preserve and provide me a link to where in CherryPy documentation mod_wsgi integration is described. It may also be relevant to look at: http://code.google.com/p/modwsgi/issues/detail?id=151 which was a ticket about how the existing documentation was out of date. If no one is interested in a link back to CherryPy documentation, then I'll just remove the page in about a week. The reason for doing this is that I cannot keep up with how all the different web frameworks and applications integrate with mod_wsgi, so any documentation I provide gets out of date. I don't like having inaccurate documentation, so am thus going to rely on developers of the web frameworks and applications to maintain their own integration guides if they support using mod_wsgi. Thanks. Graham --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cherrypy-users" group. To post to this group, send email to cherrypy-users@... To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cherrypy-users+unsubscribe@... For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cherrypy-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~--- |
|
|
Re: Removal of CherryPy documentation on mod_wsgi site.much more than a week ago ;), Graham Dumpleton threatened: > I am removing many integration guides which appear on mod_wsgi site > wiki and replacing them with links to any official documentation on > the site the page was about. In others words, in your case to be > replaced with a link to CherryPy documentation on how to use mod_wsgi > with CherryPy. > > Can some one please look through: > > http://code.google.com/p/modwsgi/wiki/IntegrationWithCherryPy > > and copy from it into the CherryPy documentation anything relevant to > your current CherryPy version you may want to preserve and provide me > a link to where in CherryPy documentation mod_wsgi integration is > described. > > It may also be relevant to look at: > > http://code.google.com/p/modwsgi/issues/detail?id=151 > > which was a ticket about how the existing documentation was out of > date. > > If no one is interested in a link back to CherryPy documentation, then > I'll just remove the page in about a week. > > The reason for doing this is that I cannot keep up with how all the > different web frameworks and applications integrate with mod_wsgi, so > any documentation I provide gets out of date. I don't like having > inaccurate documentation, so am thus going to rely on developers of > the web frameworks and applications to maintain their own integration > guides if they support using mod_wsgi. Copied to http://tools.cherrypy.org/wiki/ModWSGI Thanks for your patience! Robert Brewer fumanchu@... --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cherrypy-users" group. To post to this group, send email to cherrypy-users@... To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cherrypy-users+unsubscribe@... For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cherrypy-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~--- |
|
|
Re: Removal of CherryPy documentation on mod_wsgi site.On Oct 4, 9:37 am, "Robert Brewer" <fuman...@...> wrote: > much more than a week ago ;), Graham Dumpleton threatened: > > > > > > > I am removing many integration guides which appear on mod_wsgi site > > wiki and replacing them with links to any official documentation on > > the site the page was about. In others words, in your case to be > > replaced with a link to CherryPy documentation on how to use mod_wsgi > > with CherryPy. > > > Can some one please look through: > > > http://code.google.com/p/modwsgi/wiki/IntegrationWithCherryPy > > > and copy from it into the CherryPy documentation anything relevant to > > your current CherryPy version you may want to preserve and provide me > > a link to where in CherryPy documentation mod_wsgi integration is > > described. > > > It may also be relevant to look at: > > > http://code.google.com/p/modwsgi/issues/detail?id=151 > > > which was a ticket about how the existing documentation was out of > > date. > > > If no one is interested in a link back to CherryPy documentation, then > > I'll just remove the page in about a week. > > > The reason for doing this is that I cannot keep up with how all the > > different web frameworks and applications integrate with mod_wsgi, so > > any documentation I provide gets out of date. I don't like having > > inaccurate documentation, so am thus going to rely on developers of > > the web frameworks and applications to maintain their own integration > > guides if they support using mod_wsgi. > > Copied tohttp://tools.cherrypy.org/wiki/ModWSGIThanks for your > patience! Thanks, and updated as well, which was I was hoping would also happen. I just can't keep up with what is happening with all the frameworks these days. BTW, in respect of CherryPy and Python 3.0, if you haven't seen it already, what I am doing for Python 3.0 in mod_wsgi 3.0 is documented in: http://blog.dscpl.com.au/2009/10/new-release-candidate-for-modwsgi-30-is.html Graham --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cherrypy-users" group. To post to this group, send email to cherrypy-users@... To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cherrypy-users+unsubscribe@... For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cherrypy-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~--- |
|
|
Re: Removal of CherryPy documentation on mod_wsgi site.Graham Dumpleton wrote: > BTW, in respect of CherryPy and Python 3.0, if you haven't seen it > already, what I am doing for Python 3.0 in mod_wsgi 3.0 is documented > in: > > http://blog.dscpl.com.au/2009/10/new-release-candidate-for-modwsgi- > 30-is.html Yup. I've been working all day to get a release candidate ready for 3.2, which will follow that plan. However, we're also including support for a "full unicode" version of WSGI which I'm just calling wsgi.version = ('u', 0) since it's obviously not in the linear version history. Last week I refactored wsgiserver so we can support arbitrary, pluggable WSGI versions. Robert Brewer fumanchu@... --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cherrypy-users" group. To post to this group, send email to cherrypy-users@... To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cherrypy-users+unsubscribe@... For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cherrypy-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~--- |
|
|
Re: Removal of CherryPy documentation on mod_wsgi site.On Oct 4, 5:40 pm, "Robert Brewer" <fuman...@...> wrote: > Graham Dumpleton wrote: > > BTW, in respect of CherryPy and Python 3.0, if you haven't seen it > > already, what I am doing for Python 3.0 inmod_wsgi3.0 is documented > > in: > > > http://blog.dscpl.com.au/2009/10/new-release-candidate-for-modwsgi- > > 30-is.html > > Yup. I've been working all day to get a release candidate ready for 3.2, > which will follow that plan. However, we're also including support for a > "full unicode" version of WSGI which I'm just calling wsgi.version = > ('u', 0) since it's obviously not in the linear version history. Last > week I refactored wsgiserver so we can support arbitrary, pluggable WSGI > versions. FWIW, my current feeling is that the additional unicode encoding conversions shouldn't even be a part of the base WSGI specification. Which ever of the variants wins, I can see no reason why it shouldn't be handled as a 'x-wsgiorg' specification like 'routing_args'. Ie., http://www.wsgi.org/wsgi/Specifications Graham --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cherrypy-users" group. To post to this group, send email to cherrypy-users@... To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cherrypy-users+unsubscribe@... For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cherrypy-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~--- |
| Free embeddable forum powered by Nabble | Forum Help |