|
View:
New views
7 Messages
—
Rating Filter:
Alert me
|
|
|
Removing liftweb from Scala@NabbleHi,
This may be controversial, but anyways, here goes. I'm not a Liftweb user, and I don't plan to become one soon. So seeing all the liftweb posts in the scala mailing lists on Nabble (http://www.nabble.com/Scala-Programming-Language-f20934.html) is giving me no particular value in addition to the noise. Could the powers that be please remove liftweb from the Scala Programming Language section on Nabble? It already has a home in the Software/Web Development Framework section (http://www.nabble.com/Web-Development-Framework-f16257.html) TIA, :-lj |
|
|
Re: Removing liftweb from Scala@NabbleI added Lift to the Scala area of Nabble based on a request that people see not only Scala but practical applications of Scala and to demonstrate the unity of the Scala and Lift communities. This is exactly the same as Rails which is a child of Ruby and Web Frameworks.
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 7:00 AM, L Jantzen <ljantzen@...> wrote:
-- Lift, the simply functional web framework http://liftweb.net Beginning Scala http://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890 Follow me: http://twitter.com/dpp Git some: http://github.com/dpp |
|
|
Re: Removing liftweb from Scala@NabbleI also suspect that the lift group is being far more easily found than general scala mailing lists, as the presence on Google gives it higher visibility...
There definitely seem to be a lot more postings to the lift group, even on general topics such as eclipse plugin setup
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 4:32 PM, David Pollak <feeder.of.the.bears@...> wrote: I added Lift to the Scala area of Nabble based on a request that people see not only Scala but practical applications of Scala and to demonstrate the unity of the Scala and Lift communities. This is exactly the same as Rails which is a child of Ruby and Web Frameworks. |
|
|
Re: Removing liftweb from Scala@NabbleWhich is a perfectly valid reason. But at the moment the liftweb messages are totally drowning the rest of the traffic. And that I find less than useful. |
|
|
Re: Removing liftweb from Scala@NabbleOn Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 5:21 PM, L Jantzen<ljantzen@...> wrote:
> Which is a perfectly valid reason. But at the moment the liftweb messages > are totally drowning the rest of the traffic. And that I find less than > useful. Silly question I'm sure, but why do you read the lists via Nabble rather than using gmail and a few filters to keep the messages out of your inbox? Cheers, Miles -- Miles Sabin tel: +44 (0)7813 944 528 skype: milessabin http://www.chuusai.com/ http://twitter.com/milessabin |
|
|
Re: Removing liftweb from Scala@NabbleReading lists like this via RSS is considerably less work than doing so via e-mail. I also would agree that lift traffic is now great enough and intrusive enough that it deserves to be moved to it's own list. --Dave |
|
|
Re: Removing liftweb from Scala@NabbleI created a small greasemonkey script that filters out the liftweb posts. It solved my needs.
// ==UserScript== // @name Nabble NoLift // @namespace http://www.jantzen.no // @include http://www.nabble.com/Scala-Programming-Language-f*.html // ==/UserScript== var tbl = document.getElementsByClassName("list-table").item(0); var tds = tbl.getElementsByTagName("td"); var trs = new Array(); var numTrs = 0; var tableSection = tbl.childNodes.item(1) for (var i=0; i<tds.length;i++) { var td = tds.item(i); if (td.textContent.indexOf('liftweb') != -1) trs[numTrs++] = td.parentNode; } for (var i=0; i<trs.length;i++) { var tr = trs[i]; tableSection.removeChild(tr) }
|
| Free embeddable forum powered by Nabble | Forum Help |