Removing the Full Indexer
|
View:
New views
6 Messages
—
Rating Filter:
Alert me
|
 |
Removing the Full Indexer
by Schorn, Markus
::
Rate this Message:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Re: Removing the Full Indexer
by Chris Recoskie
::
Rate this Message:
Is the full indexer not still required for accurate refactoring?
Hi, The full indexer does not provide an advantage over the fast indexer. I suggest to remove it (https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=294864). What do you think? Markus. _______________________________________________ cdt-dev mailing list cdt-dev@... https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev _______________________________________________ cdt-dev mailing list cdt-dev@... https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
RE: Removing the Full Indexer
by Schorn, Markus
::
Rate this Message:
While the full indexer parses every header over and
over again, it just stores a single version of each header in the index. So
where clients depend on the index (e.g. when creating an index based
AST), they'll have to rely on that single version
of the header.
Clients can
always decide to create an AST that
does not depend on the index.
Markus.
_______________________________________________ cdt-dev mailing list cdt-dev@... https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
RE: Removing the Full Indexer
by Chris Recoskie
::
Rate this Message:
Ok, thanks for the clarification.
While the full indexer parses every header over and over again, it just stores a single version of each header in the index. So where clients depend on the index (e.g. when creating an index based AST), they'll have to rely on that single version of the header. Clients can always decide to create an AST that does not depend on the index. Markus. From: cdt-dev-bounces@... [cdt-dev-bounces@...] On Behalf Of Chris Recoskie Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 2009 2:17 PM To: CDT General developers list. Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] Removing the Full Indexer Importance: Low Is the full indexer not still required for accurate refactoring?
Hi, The full indexer does not provide an advantage over the fast indexer. I suggest to remove it (https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=294864). What do you think? Markus. _______________________________________________ cdt-dev mailing list cdt-dev@... https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev _______________________________________________ cdt-dev mailing list cdt-dev@... https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev _______________________________________________ cdt-dev mailing list cdt-dev@... https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Re: Removing the Full Indexer
by Doug Schaefer-4
::
Rate this Message:
+1 big time.
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 9:05 AM, Chris Recoskie <recoskie@...> wrote:
_______________________________________________ cdt-dev mailing list cdt-dev@... https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Re: Removing the Full Indexer
by Emanuel Graf
::
Rate this Message:
|
"Schorn, Markus" <
pic26580.gif (1K) 
"Schorn, Markus" <
"Schorn, Markus" <
| Free embeddable forum powered by Nabble | Forum Help |
