|
View:
New views
4 Messages
—
Rating Filter:
Alert me
|
|
|
Review Request: improved, Solid-based network error handling----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviewboard.kde.org/r/1933/ ----------------------------------------------------------- Review request for kdelibs. Summary ------- Adds Solid integration into basic network error-handling. This implementation should be applied across all applications that use standard error-handling messages, but I think it might be more proper for Solid to be integrated at the individual back-ends (for example, automatically disconnecting from online services and sending a message to the application a la Kopete). This is my first patch, so feedback is welcomed and appreciated. Diffs ----- trunk/KDE/kdelibs/kio/kio/global.cpp 1031233 Diff: http://reviewboard.kde.org/r/1933/diff Testing ------- The only testing I have been able to do is to see whether this compiles properly - which it does. I have not been able to build kdebase/any individual applications against it recently, which is what I plan to do. Thanks, Marcus |
|
|
Re: Review Request: improved, Solid-based network error handling----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviewboard.kde.org/r/1933/#review2918 ----------------------------------------------------------- I like the idea, but obviously this needs to be tested. Of course this can never be 100% correct in its analysis. Your network interfaces could be up and your router could be offline, or your ISP messing up routing, etc. ;) So "incorrectly typed" is really just one possibility among many ;) trunk/KDE/kdelibs/kio/kio/global.cpp <http://reviewboard.kde.org/r/1933/#comment2321> Please use a switch() to avoid calling Solid::Networking::Status() twice. - David On 2009-10-22 15:18:41, Marcus Harrison wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > http://reviewboard.kde.org/r/1933/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated 2009-10-22 15:18:41) > > > Review request for kdelibs. > > > Summary > ------- > > Adds Solid integration into basic network error-handling. This implementation should be applied across all applications that use standard error-handling messages, but I think it might be more proper for Solid to be integrated at the individual back-ends (for example, automatically disconnecting from online services and sending a message to the application a la Kopete). > > This is my first patch, so feedback is welcomed and appreciated. > > > Diffs > ----- > > trunk/KDE/kdelibs/kio/kio/global.cpp 1031233 > > Diff: http://reviewboard.kde.org/r/1933/diff > > > Testing > ------- > > The only testing I have been able to do is to see whether this compiles properly - which it does. I have not been able to build kdebase/any individual applications against it recently, which is what I plan to do. > > > Thanks, > > Marcus > > |
|
|
Re: Review Request: improved, Solid-based network error handling----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviewboard.kde.org/r/1933/#review2923 ----------------------------------------------------------- I implemented this as a patch for KDE 3, but it was never integrated because KDE 3.6 was never released. Here are the diffs, it may be informative, or a giant hack! http://ktown.kde.org/~wstephenson/kde3_kdelibs_offline_mode.diff http://ktown.kde.org/~wstephenson/kdebase_http_offline_mode.diff http://ktown.kde.org/~wstephenson/kde3_kdepim_offline_mode.diff The svn branches that the patches come from are here: http://websvn.kde.org/branches/work/~wstephens/ - Will On 2009-10-22 15:18:41, Marcus Harrison wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > http://reviewboard.kde.org/r/1933/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated 2009-10-22 15:18:41) > > > Review request for kdelibs. > > > Summary > ------- > > Adds Solid integration into basic network error-handling. This implementation should be applied across all applications that use standard error-handling messages, but I think it might be more proper for Solid to be integrated at the individual back-ends (for example, automatically disconnecting from online services and sending a message to the application a la Kopete). > > This is my first patch, so feedback is welcomed and appreciated. > > > Diffs > ----- > > trunk/KDE/kdelibs/kio/kio/global.cpp 1031233 > > Diff: http://reviewboard.kde.org/r/1933/diff > > > Testing > ------- > > The only testing I have been able to do is to see whether this compiles properly - which it does. I have not been able to build kdebase/any individual applications against it recently, which is what I plan to do. > > > Thanks, > > Marcus > > |
|
|
Re: Review Request: improved, Solid-based network error handling----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviewboard.kde.org/r/1933/ ----------------------------------------------------------- (Updated 2009-11-05 21:41:45.820010) Review request for kdelibs. Summary ------- Adds Solid integration into basic network error-handling. This implementation should be applied across all applications that use standard error-handling messages, but I think it might be more proper for Solid to be integrated at the individual back-ends (for example, automatically disconnecting from online services and sending a message to the application a la Kopete). This is my first patch, so feedback is welcomed and appreciated. Diffs (updated) ----- trunk/KDE/kdelibs/kio/kio/global.cpp 1044591 Diff: http://reviewboard.kde.org/r/1933/diff Testing ------- The only testing I have been able to do is to see whether this compiles properly - which it does. I have not been able to build kdebase/any individual applications against it recently, which is what I plan to do. Thanks, Marcus |
| Free embeddable forum powered by Nabble | Forum Help |