Review Request: incidence.cpp:622: warning: enumeration value 'None' not handled in switch

View: New views
7 Messages — Rating Filter:   Alert me  

Review Request: incidence.cpp:622: warning: enumeration value 'None' not handled in switch

by Bugzilla from guy-kde@maurel.de :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviewboard.kde.org/r/1906/
-----------------------------------------------------------

Review request for KDE PIM.


Summary
-------

The dashboard
  http://dashboard.akonadi-project.org/CDash/index.php?project=kdelibs
reports:
/.../kdepim/kresources/kolab/kcal/incidence.cpp:622: warning: enumeration value 'None' not handled in switch

at
static QString attendeeStatusToString( KCal::Attendee::PartStat status )

my proposal:add the enumeration value 'None' in the switch
see: incidence-gm-21.diff


Diffs
-----

  /trunk/KDE/kdepim/kresources/kolab/kcal/incidence.cpp 1031659

Diff: http://reviewboard.kde.org/r/1906/diff


Testing
-------


Thanks,

Guy

_______________________________________________
KDE PIM mailing list kde-pim@...
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-pim
KDE PIM home page at http://pim.kde.org/

Re: Review Request: incidence.cpp:622: warning: enumeration value 'None' not handled in switch

by Bugzilla from kde@nyblom.org :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviewboard.kde.org/r/1906/#review2735
-----------------------------------------------------------


For consistency you should use the same value for the "None" case in this patch as in the other for the same variable.
Either go with the default (seems to be "accepted") or return another meaningful string (might be empty, but as I don't know the code...)

- Torgny


On 2009-10-19 18:28:42, Guy Maurel wrote:

>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://reviewboard.kde.org/r/1906/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> (Updated 2009-10-19 18:28:42)
>
>
> Review request for KDE PIM.
>
>
> Summary
> -------
>
> The dashboard
>   http://dashboard.akonadi-project.org/CDash/index.php?project=kdelibs
> reports:
> /.../kdepim/kresources/kolab/kcal/incidence.cpp:622: warning: enumeration value 'None' not handled in switch
>
> at
> static QString attendeeStatusToString( KCal::Attendee::PartStat status )
>
> my proposal:add the enumeration value 'None' in the switch
> see: incidence-gm-21.diff
>
>
> Diffs
> -----
>
>   /trunk/KDE/kdepim/kresources/kolab/kcal/incidence.cpp 1031659
>
> Diff: http://reviewboard.kde.org/r/1906/diff
>
>
> Testing
> -------
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Guy
>
>

_______________________________________________
KDE PIM mailing list kde-pim@...
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-pim
KDE PIM home page at http://pim.kde.org/

Re: Review Request: incidence.cpp:622: warning: enumeration value 'None' not handled in switch

by Bugzilla from guy-kde@maurel.de :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message



> On 2009-10-21 07:03:35, Torgny Nyblom wrote:
> > For consistency you should use the same value for the "None" case in this patch as in the other for the same variable.
> > Either go with the default (seems to be "accepted") or return another meaningful string (might be empty, but as I don't know the code...)

right, thanks


- Guy


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviewboard.kde.org/r/1906/#review2735
-----------------------------------------------------------


On 2009-10-19 18:28:42, Guy Maurel wrote:

>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://reviewboard.kde.org/r/1906/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> (Updated 2009-10-19 18:28:42)
>
>
> Review request for KDE PIM.
>
>
> Summary
> -------
>
> The dashboard
>   http://dashboard.akonadi-project.org/CDash/index.php?project=kdelibs
> reports:
> /.../kdepim/kresources/kolab/kcal/incidence.cpp:622: warning: enumeration value 'None' not handled in switch
>
> at
> static QString attendeeStatusToString( KCal::Attendee::PartStat status )
>
> my proposal:add the enumeration value 'None' in the switch
> see: incidence-gm-21.diff
>
>
> Diffs
> -----
>
>   /trunk/KDE/kdepim/kresources/kolab/kcal/incidence.cpp 1031659
>
> Diff: http://reviewboard.kde.org/r/1906/diff
>
>
> Testing
> -------
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Guy
>
>

_______________________________________________
KDE PIM mailing list kde-pim@...
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-pim
KDE PIM home page at http://pim.kde.org/

Re: Review Request: incidence.cpp:622: warning: enumeration value 'None' not handled in switch

by Bugzilla from guy-kde@maurel.de :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviewboard.kde.org/r/1906/
-----------------------------------------------------------

(Updated 2009-10-21 19:01:28.401375)


Review request for KDE PIM.


Summary
-------

The dashboard
  http://dashboard.akonadi-project.org/CDash/index.php?project=kdelibs
reports:
/.../kdepim/kresources/kolab/kcal/incidence.cpp:622: warning: enumeration value 'None' not handled in switch

at
static QString attendeeStatusToString( KCal::Attendee::PartStat status )

my proposal:add the enumeration value 'None' in the switch
see: incidence-gm-21.diff


Diffs (updated)
-----

  /trunk/KDE/kdepim/kresources/kolab/kcal/incidence.cpp 1031659

Diff: http://reviewboard.kde.org/r/1906/diff


Testing
-------


Thanks,

Guy

_______________________________________________
KDE PIM mailing list kde-pim@...
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-pim
KDE PIM home page at http://pim.kde.org/

Re: Review Request: incidence.cpp:622: warning: enumeration value 'None' not handled in switch

by David Jarvie-4 :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviewboard.kde.org/r/1906/#review2781
-----------------------------------------------------------



/trunk/KDE/kdepim/kresources/kolab/kcal/incidence.cpp
<http://reviewboard.kde.org/r/1906/#comment2132>

    Rather return QString()


- David


On 2009-10-21 19:01:28, Guy Maurel wrote:

>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://reviewboard.kde.org/r/1906/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> (Updated 2009-10-21 19:01:28)
>
>
> Review request for KDE PIM.
>
>
> Summary
> -------
>
> The dashboard
>   http://dashboard.akonadi-project.org/CDash/index.php?project=kdelibs
> reports:
> /.../kdepim/kresources/kolab/kcal/incidence.cpp:622: warning: enumeration value 'None' not handled in switch
>
> at
> static QString attendeeStatusToString( KCal::Attendee::PartStat status )
>
> my proposal:add the enumeration value 'None' in the switch
> see: incidence-gm-21.diff
>
>
> Diffs
> -----
>
>   /trunk/KDE/kdepim/kresources/kolab/kcal/incidence.cpp 1031659
>
> Diff: http://reviewboard.kde.org/r/1906/diff
>
>
> Testing
> -------
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Guy
>
>

_______________________________________________
KDE PIM mailing list kde-pim@...
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-pim
KDE PIM home page at http://pim.kde.org/

Re: Review Request: incidence.cpp:622: warning: enumeration value 'None' not handled in switch

by Bugzilla from b.broeksema@home.nl :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviewboard.kde.org/r/1906/#review2940
-----------------------------------------------------------



/trunk/KDE/kdepim/kresources/kolab/kcal/incidence.cpp
<http://reviewboard.kde.org/r/1906/#comment2334>

    I would say that you should return "none" here. That seems the best option when looking at NeedsAction.


- Bertjan


On 2009-10-21 19:01:28, Guy Maurel wrote:

>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://reviewboard.kde.org/r/1906/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> (Updated 2009-10-21 19:01:28)
>
>
> Review request for KDE PIM.
>
>
> Summary
> -------
>
> The dashboard
>   http://dashboard.akonadi-project.org/CDash/index.php?project=kdelibs
> reports:
> /.../kdepim/kresources/kolab/kcal/incidence.cpp:622: warning: enumeration value 'None' not handled in switch
>
> at
> static QString attendeeStatusToString( KCal::Attendee::PartStat status )
>
> my proposal:add the enumeration value 'None' in the switch
> see: incidence-gm-21.diff
>
>
> Diffs
> -----
>
>   /trunk/KDE/kdepim/kresources/kolab/kcal/incidence.cpp 1031659
>
> Diff: http://reviewboard.kde.org/r/1906/diff
>
>
> Testing
> -------
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Guy
>
>

_______________________________________________
KDE PIM mailing list kde-pim@...
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-pim
KDE PIM home page at http://pim.kde.org/

Re: Review Request: incidence.cpp:622: warning: enumeration value 'None' not handled in switch

by Bugzilla from guy-kde@maurel.de :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message



> On 2009-11-05 19:01:11, Bertjan Broeksema wrote:
> > /trunk/KDE/kdepim/kresources/kolab/kcal/incidence.cpp, line 639
> > <http://reviewboard.kde.org/r/1906/diff/2/?file=13119#file13119line639>
> >
> >     I would say that you should return "none" here. That seems the best option when looking at NeedsAction.

I would like to propose somethings else!
Have a look to my calls 1902 and 1906.
It is the same problem/question. And have a look 3 lines after. The author has allready an idea what is to do, but place this at a not very good place. Within the switch should be better.
BUT:
why do we have two files with nearly the same code? Some functions are really the same!
Should it be better to try to do a "merge"?


- Guy


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviewboard.kde.org/r/1906/#review2940
-----------------------------------------------------------


On 2009-10-21 19:01:28, Guy Maurel wrote:

>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://reviewboard.kde.org/r/1906/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> (Updated 2009-10-21 19:01:28)
>
>
> Review request for KDE PIM.
>
>
> Summary
> -------
>
> The dashboard
>   http://dashboard.akonadi-project.org/CDash/index.php?project=kdelibs
> reports:
> /.../kdepim/kresources/kolab/kcal/incidence.cpp:622: warning: enumeration value 'None' not handled in switch
>
> at
> static QString attendeeStatusToString( KCal::Attendee::PartStat status )
>
> my proposal:add the enumeration value 'None' in the switch
> see: incidence-gm-21.diff
>
>
> Diffs
> -----
>
>   /trunk/KDE/kdepim/kresources/kolab/kcal/incidence.cpp 1031659
>
> Diff: http://reviewboard.kde.org/r/1906/diff
>
>
> Testing
> -------
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Guy
>
>

_______________________________________________
KDE PIM mailing list kde-pim@...
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-pim
KDE PIM home page at http://pim.kde.org/