Review Request: whitespace cleanup of kmail messageactions.cpp and kmmainwidget.cpp

View: New views
3 Messages — Rating Filter:   Alert me  

Review Request: whitespace cleanup of kmail messageactions.cpp and kmmainwidget.cpp

by Bugzilla from daniel.subs@internode.on.net :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviewboard.kde.org/r/1956/
-----------------------------------------------------------

Review request for KDE PIM.


Summary
-------

whitespace cleanup of some files discovered when doing review 1768.

svn diff -x -w messageactions.cpp kmmainwidget.cpp
shows empty so this is really only whitespace. SLOTs and SIGNAL internal bracketing has not been changed.

This aids developers changing these two files of some cleaner syntax.


Diffs
-----

  /trunk/KDE/kdepim/kmail/kmmainwidget.cpp 1039626
  /trunk/KDE/kdepim/kmail/messageactions.cpp 1039626

Diff: http://reviewboard.kde.org/r/1956/diff


Testing
-------

9 out of 82 hunks didn't patch nicely against kdepim-4.3.2 however the rest compiled and ran ok. I couldn't seen any errors with the Failed hunks apart from they were made against svn and didn't patch well on 4.3.2.


Thanks,

Daniel

_______________________________________________
KDE PIM mailing list kde-pim@...
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-pim
KDE PIM home page at http://pim.kde.org/

Re: Review Request: whitespace cleanup of kmail messageactions.cpp and kmmainwidget.cpp

by Bugzilla from vkrause@kde.org :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviewboard.kde.org/r/1956/#review2807
-----------------------------------------------------------


*Please* avoid coding style changes while we have the akonadi-ports branch open, it is hard enough already to keep those two in sync. Patches like this one are basically unmergable and thus would get lost anyway.

- Volker


On 2009-10-24 03:41:12, Daniel Black wrote:

>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://reviewboard.kde.org/r/1956/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> (Updated 2009-10-24 03:41:12)
>
>
> Review request for KDE PIM.
>
>
> Summary
> -------
>
> whitespace cleanup of some files discovered when doing review 1768.
>
> svn diff -x -w messageactions.cpp kmmainwidget.cpp
> shows empty so this is really only whitespace. SLOTs and SIGNAL internal bracketing has not been changed.
>
> This aids developers changing these two files of some cleaner syntax.
>
>
> Diffs
> -----
>
>   /trunk/KDE/kdepim/kmail/kmmainwidget.cpp 1039626
>   /trunk/KDE/kdepim/kmail/messageactions.cpp 1039626
>
> Diff: http://reviewboard.kde.org/r/1956/diff
>
>
> Testing
> -------
>
> 9 out of 82 hunks didn't patch nicely against kdepim-4.3.2 however the rest compiled and ran ok. I couldn't seen any errors with the Failed hunks apart from they were made against svn and didn't patch well on 4.3.2.
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Daniel
>
>

_______________________________________________
KDE PIM mailing list kde-pim@...
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-pim
KDE PIM home page at http://pim.kde.org/

Re: Review Request: whitespace cleanup of kmail messageactions.cpp and kmmainwidget.cpp

by Bugzilla from mcguire@kde.org :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviewboard.kde.org/r/1956/#review2842
-----------------------------------------------------------


I'd say the patch is ok, but Volker disagrees, and since he does all the time-consuming merging work, I'd say drop this patch for now.
Please close the review request.
Sorry, but merging stuff with SVN really sucks in that regard.

- Thomas


On 2009-10-24 03:41:12, Daniel Black wrote:

>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://reviewboard.kde.org/r/1956/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> (Updated 2009-10-24 03:41:12)
>
>
> Review request for KDE PIM.
>
>
> Summary
> -------
>
> whitespace cleanup of some files discovered when doing review 1768.
>
> svn diff -x -w messageactions.cpp kmmainwidget.cpp
> shows empty so this is really only whitespace. SLOTs and SIGNAL internal bracketing has not been changed.
>
> This aids developers changing these two files of some cleaner syntax.
>
>
> Diffs
> -----
>
>   /trunk/KDE/kdepim/kmail/kmmainwidget.cpp 1039626
>   /trunk/KDE/kdepim/kmail/messageactions.cpp 1039626
>
> Diff: http://reviewboard.kde.org/r/1956/diff
>
>
> Testing
> -------
>
> 9 out of 82 hunks didn't patch nicely against kdepim-4.3.2 however the rest compiled and ran ok. I couldn't seen any errors with the Failed hunks apart from they were made against svn and didn't patch well on 4.3.2.
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Daniel
>
>

_______________________________________________
KDE PIM mailing list kde-pim@...
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-pim
KDE PIM home page at http://pim.kde.org/