Review of draft-ietf-6man-addr-select-opt-01

Hi,

I promised to make a review of this I-D. My comments can be found here:
http://deadcoderssociety.net/6man.pdf

There are two main things:
1) I suggest to remove all text that references into the future regarding ongoing work etc. That will look a bit weird when actual RFCs come out etc.
2) It is not clear what happens when DASP_OPTION is received from multiple sources and in all cases Section 4.2. "trust" requirements are met. Will the last received policy overwrite all previously learned?

Also I did not quite get the "leak of privacy information". Could you elaborate that a bit further in the I-D. And finally, regarding the prefix encoding in the option I would myself prefer 1 octet granularity over 4.. or is there a specific reason for selecting 4? (DHCPv6 options do not have alignment requirements)

- Jouni

On Nov 9, 2011, at 10:21 AM, Arifumi Matsumoto wrote:

_______________________________________________
dhcwg mailing list
dhcwg@...
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg