|
View:
New views
5 Messages
—
Rating Filter:
Alert me
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Ruler commentsOn Sun, Jul 5, 2009 at 10:08 PM, D. Michael
McIntyre<rosegarden.trumpeter@...> wrote: > I'd almost vote for that after I just worked on a chunk of code with QColor > here, Colour from one of our classes there, and Color from another one of our > classes spread around in the middle. I used Colour in the new code as a nod > to the Chrisses, but a good case could have been made to use Color instead. We should probably throw in the odd Couleur and Colore class as well, just to increase our linguistic coverage. Sorry, couverage. > (As far as that goes though, in the 18th century we changed "colour" > into "color" and you changed "curb" into "kerb." We have both curb and kerb. Kerb is a noun, curb is a vurb. Chris ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Rosegarden-devel mailing list Rosegarden-devel@... - use the link below to unsubscribe https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel |
|
|
Re: Ruler commentsOn Sunday 05 July 2009, Chris Cannam wrote:
> We should probably throw in the odd Couleur and Colore class as well, > just to increase our linguistic coverage. Sorry, couverage. I could add that using "Color" already expands our linguistic coverage considerably. Color. I just said that in Romanian. Color. That one was Latin. Color. That one was Spanish. Color. That one was Provençal. > > (As far as that goes though, in the 18th century we changed "colour" > > into "color" and you changed "curb" into "kerb." > > We have both curb and kerb. Kerb is a noun, curb is a vurb. What, your drivers never kerb your tires? (Oh drat, I mean your tyres. That's another one where our spelling is older, incidentally.) -- D. Michael McIntyre ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Rosegarden-devel mailing list Rosegarden-devel@... - use the link below to unsubscribe https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel |
|
|
Re: Ruler commentsOn Sun, 2009-07-05 at 17:08 -0400, D. Michael McIntyre wrote:
> The only lingering thing I'd grouse about there is the way a bar > will grow so tall that the top of its border is cut off when it hits the > upper limit. Yep. That's on my fictional list, quite near the back because the list is dominated by implementing a ControlTool mechanism based on BaseTool whilst fighting off the temptation to just process everything in widget mouse event handlers. > A few of the velocities I picked at random, the colors didn't lighten so well. > At a certain range, you're getting into dark yellows that become bright > yellows, and then revert back to dark yellows when unselected. It looks a > bit strange. A good idea, just with a bit more tweaking indicated I think. I've not looked at that yet. Maybe, as I said before, looking at saturation will be the answer. This behaviour is particularly relevant because you can't (now) use the control ruler to change selection. I think this is logical given the ambiguity of notes in chords but wanted to raise the fact at this early stage. > Also, we really need some kind of alpha in here too, as a way to help deal > with overlapping velocities. A chord with a different velocity in each note, > the note with the highest velocity obscures everything else. I think the > event rectangles on the matrix grid are already only 80% opaque (I have no > idea what the real figure is) to show up overlapping events more easily. We > could just find wherever that is and apply it in the ruler too. Good point. I'll look into it. > I'd almost vote for that after I just worked on a chunk of code with QColor > here, Colour from one of our classes there, and Color from another one of our > classes spread around in the middle. I used Colour in the new code as a nod > to the Chrisses, but a good case could have been made to use Color instead. > Kuller doesn't actually seem like such a ludicrous idea, but only if we can > have QKuller too. > > (As far as that goes though, in the 18th century we changed "colour" > into "color" and you changed "curb" into "kerb." At least "color" > and "colour" are mutually intelligible. I had to encounter "kerb" about ten > times before I realized it was a real word with a long history, and not some > cute online gamer spelling like "teh" or "moar.") happy using eclipse now and recommend it strongly - I've got effective debugging and everything. Now, if I could find the time to write some "pedantic/pathetic/patriotic" plug-in that would offer "How do you want to spell colour/color?" ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Rosegarden-devel mailing list Rosegarden-devel@... - use the link below to unsubscribe https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel |
|
|
Re: Ruler commentsOn Sunday 05 Jul 2009 22:37:57 D. Michael McIntyre wrote:
> kerb your tires? What is it they say state-side? "There ain't a noun that can't be verbed"? ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Rosegarden-devel mailing list Rosegarden-devel@... - use the link below to unsubscribe https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel |
| Free embeddable forum powered by Nabble | Forum Help |