
Some parts of this message have been removed.
Learn more about Nabble's
security policy.
Hi,
I noticed that in the SCXML standard Working Draft 7 May
2009 located here
http://www.w3.org/TR/scxml/
that if you search for the expression “next=”,
you’ll find it in one location, and yet, in the section
3.3 <Transition>
3.3.1
Attribute Details
there is no attribute named “next”. This seems
to be a piece of lingering code from the previous standards and could possibly
be an error. I just wanted to raise this flag, and if this issue is caused by an
incorrect understanding of the standard then please ignore this email.
Thanks.
Best Regards,
Mike Lee
**************** CAUTION - Disclaimer *****************
This e-mail contains PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION intended solely
for the use of the addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, please
notify the sender by e-mail and delete the original message. Further, you are not
to copy, disclose, or distribute this e-mail or its contents to any other person and
any such actions are unlawful. This e-mail may contain viruses. Infosys has taken
every reasonable precaution to minimize this risk, but is not liable for any damage
you may sustain as a result of any virus in this e-mail. You should carry out your
own virus checks before opening the e-mail or attachment. Infosys reserves the
right to monitor and review the content of all messages sent to or from this e-mail
address. Messages sent to or from this e-mail address may be stored on the
Infosys e-mail system.
***INFOSYS******** End of Disclaimer ********INFOSYS*** |