|
View:
New views
5 Messages
—
Rating Filter:
Alert me
|
|
|
SMSC name conflict???Hi guys,
Is there any possibility to have conflict between two bearerbox processes running in paralel, having separate smpp connection but same SMSC name?? example: gprs-bill 2009-11-04 16:50:44 [5057] [6] DEBUG: SMPP[gprs-bill]: Sending enquire link: 2009-11-04 16:50:44 [5057] [6] DEBUG: SMPP PDU 0x9743758 dump: 2009-11-04 16:50:44 [5057] [6] DEBUG: type_name: enquire_link 2009-11-04 16:50:44 [5057] [6] DEBUG: command_id: 21 = 0x00000015 2009-11-04 16:50:44 [5057] [6] DEBUG: command_status: 0 = 0x00000000 2009-11-04 16:50:44 [5057] [6] DEBUG: sequence_number: 28 = 0x0000001c 2009-11-04 16:50:44 [5057] [6] DEBUG: SMPP PDU dump ends. I`m just doubting because I had some "connection reset" errors. Thanks |
|
|
|
|
|
Re: SMSC name conflict???Elton
I think it is more a problem from your SMSC provider. If they do allow you to have 2 -or more- connections to the same port or not. The connection resets can happen for multiple reasons including problems on any of the peers, the network (Lan/Wan) , etc. Hope helps |-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| Envíe y Reciba Datos y mensajes de Texto (SMS) hacia y desde cualquier celular y Nextel en el Perú, México y en mas de 180 paises. Use aplicaciones 2 vias via SMS y GPRS online Visitenos en www.perusms.NET www.smsglobal.com.mx y www.pravcom.com On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 11:56 AM, Elton Hoxha <elthox@...> wrote: > > More details: > > - a.conf > > group=smsc > smsc=smpp > smsc-id=gprs-bill > interface-version=34 > host=10.1.7.21 > port=1600 > system-id=a > smsc-password=a > system-type=a > transceiver-mode=true > > - b.conf > group=smsc > smsc=smpp > smsc-id=gprs-bill > interface-version=34 > host=10.1.7.21 > port=1600 > system-id=b > smsc-password=b > system-type=b > transceiver-mode=true > > So, starting to bearerboxes (normally with different ports) may cause any > problem if both conf files have same smsc-id? > > Thanks > > > > > On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 5:43 PM, vijay shanker <vijay.shad@...> wrote: >> >> Can not be conformed. >> How many connection your SMMP service provider supports? >> Two bearer box may be running but on different ports. Try to find out or >> give more relevant details. >> Like what is your configuration? or what is the problem you have >> encountered. >> Regards, >> Vijay Shanker Dubey >> >> >> >> On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 9:22 PM, Elton Hoxha <elthox@...> wrote: >>> >>> Hi guys, >>> >>> Is there any possibility to have conflict between two bearerbox processes >>> running in paralel, having separate smpp connection but same SMSC name?? >>> example: gprs-bill >>> >>> 2009-11-04 16:50:44 [5057] [6] DEBUG: SMPP[gprs-bill]: Sending enquire >>> link: >>> 2009-11-04 16:50:44 [5057] [6] DEBUG: SMPP PDU 0x9743758 dump: >>> 2009-11-04 16:50:44 [5057] [6] DEBUG: type_name: enquire_link >>> 2009-11-04 16:50:44 [5057] [6] DEBUG: command_id: 21 = 0x00000015 >>> 2009-11-04 16:50:44 [5057] [6] DEBUG: command_status: 0 = 0x00000000 >>> 2009-11-04 16:50:44 [5057] [6] DEBUG: sequence_number: 28 = 0x0000001c >>> 2009-11-04 16:50:44 [5057] [6] DEBUG: SMPP PDU dump ends. >>> >>> I`m just doubting because I had some "connection reset" errors. >>> >>> Thanks >> > > > |
|
|
Re: SMSC name conflict???Thanks Alvaro but its a misundesrtanding. ITs not a matter of SMSC provider. Im just thinking from kannel point of view, considering the example I gave above.
Actually both conenctions are live and running, but sometimes having interruption, connection reset by peer. When sending the enquiry link, kannel prints smsc name 2009-11-04 18:28:44 [5057] [6] DEBUG: SMPP[gprs-bill]: Sending enquire link: 2009-11-04 18:28:44 [5057] [6] DEBUG: SMPP PDU 0x973d3a8 dump: 2009-11-04 18:28:44 [5057] [6] DEBUG: type_name: enquire_link 2009-11-04 18:28:44 [5057] [6] DEBUG: command_id: 21 = 0x00000015 2009-11-04 18:28:44 [5057] [6] DEBUG: command_status: 0 = 0x00000000 2009-11-04 18:28:44 [5057] [6] DEBUG: sequence_number: 224 = 0x000000e0 2009-11-04 18:28:44 [5057] [6] DEBUG: SMPP PDU dump ends. So by havving two processes by sending enqiry links or whatever with the same name gprs-bill, may be any problem? THanks On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 6:20 PM, Alvaro Cornejo <cornejo.alvaro@...> wrote: Elton |
|
|
Re: SMSC name conflict???Hi,
From BB's point of view each process is agnostic of the other.
Each process has its own sockets and cannot read the other's. There can be no
mixup.
BR,
Nikos
|
| Free embeddable forum powered by Nabble | Forum Help |