SMSC name conflict???

View: New views
5 Messages — Rating Filter:   Alert me  

SMSC name conflict???

by elthox :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

Hi guys,

Is there any possibility to have conflict between two bearerbox processes running in paralel, having separate smpp connection but same SMSC name??
example: gprs-bill

2009-11-04 16:50:44 [5057] [6] DEBUG: SMPP[gprs-bill]: Sending enquire link:
2009-11-04 16:50:44 [5057] [6] DEBUG: SMPP PDU 0x9743758 dump:
2009-11-04 16:50:44 [5057] [6] DEBUG:   type_name: enquire_link
2009-11-04 16:50:44 [5057] [6] DEBUG:   command_id: 21 = 0x00000015
2009-11-04 16:50:44 [5057] [6] DEBUG:   command_status: 0 = 0x00000000
2009-11-04 16:50:44 [5057] [6] DEBUG:   sequence_number: 28 = 0x0000001c
2009-11-04 16:50:44 [5057] [6] DEBUG: SMPP PDU dump ends.

I`m just doubting because I had some "connection reset" errors.

Thanks

Parent Message unknown Fwd: SMSC name conflict???

by elthox :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message


More details:

- a.conf

group=smsc
smsc=smpp
smsc-id=gprs-bill
interface-version=34
host=10.1.7.21
port=1600
system-id=a
smsc-password=a
system-type=a
transceiver-mode=true

- b.conf
group=smsc
smsc=smpp
smsc-id=gprs-bill
interface-version=34
host=10.1.7.21
port=1600
system-id=b
smsc-password=b
system-type=b
transceiver-mode=true

So, starting to bearerboxes (normally with different ports) may cause any problem if both conf files have same smsc-id?

Thanks





On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 5:43 PM, vijay shanker <vijay.shad@...> wrote:
Can not be conformed. 

How many connection your SMMP service provider supports?

Two bearer box may be running but on different ports. Try to find out or give more relevant details.

Like what is your configuration? or what is the problem you have encountered.

Regards,
Vijay Shanker Dubey




On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 9:22 PM, Elton Hoxha <elthox@...> wrote:
Hi guys,

Is there any possibility to have conflict between two bearerbox processes running in paralel, having separate smpp connection but same SMSC name??
example: gprs-bill

2009-11-04 16:50:44 [5057] [6] DEBUG: SMPP[gprs-bill]: Sending enquire link:
2009-11-04 16:50:44 [5057] [6] DEBUG: SMPP PDU 0x9743758 dump:
2009-11-04 16:50:44 [5057] [6] DEBUG:   type_name: enquire_link
2009-11-04 16:50:44 [5057] [6] DEBUG:   command_id: 21 = 0x00000015
2009-11-04 16:50:44 [5057] [6] DEBUG:   command_status: 0 = 0x00000000
2009-11-04 16:50:44 [5057] [6] DEBUG:   sequence_number: 28 = 0x0000001c
2009-11-04 16:50:44 [5057] [6] DEBUG: SMPP PDU dump ends.

I`m just doubting because I had some "connection reset" errors.

Thanks




Re: SMSC name conflict???

by Alvaro Cornejo :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

Elton

I think it is more a problem from your SMSC provider. If they do allow
you to have 2 -or more- connections to the same port or not.

The connection resets can happen for multiple reasons including
problems on any of the peers, the network (Lan/Wan) , etc.

Hope helps


|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Envíe y Reciba Datos y mensajes de Texto (SMS) hacia y desde cualquier
celular y Nextel
en el Perú, México y en mas de 180 paises. Use aplicaciones 2 vias via
SMS y GPRS online
              Visitenos en www.perusms.NET www.smsglobal.com.mx y
www.pravcom.com



On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 11:56 AM, Elton Hoxha <elthox@...> wrote:

>
> More details:
>
> - a.conf
>
> group=smsc
> smsc=smpp
> smsc-id=gprs-bill
> interface-version=34
> host=10.1.7.21
> port=1600
> system-id=a
> smsc-password=a
> system-type=a
> transceiver-mode=true
>
> - b.conf
> group=smsc
> smsc=smpp
> smsc-id=gprs-bill
> interface-version=34
> host=10.1.7.21
> port=1600
> system-id=b
> smsc-password=b
> system-type=b
> transceiver-mode=true
>
> So, starting to bearerboxes (normally with different ports) may cause any
> problem if both conf files have same smsc-id?
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 5:43 PM, vijay shanker <vijay.shad@...> wrote:
>>
>> Can not be conformed.
>> How many connection your SMMP service provider supports?
>> Two bearer box may be running but on different ports. Try to find out or
>> give more relevant details.
>> Like what is your configuration? or what is the problem you have
>> encountered.
>> Regards,
>> Vijay Shanker Dubey
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 9:22 PM, Elton Hoxha <elthox@...> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi guys,
>>>
>>> Is there any possibility to have conflict between two bearerbox processes
>>> running in paralel, having separate smpp connection but same SMSC name??
>>> example: gprs-bill
>>>
>>> 2009-11-04 16:50:44 [5057] [6] DEBUG: SMPP[gprs-bill]: Sending enquire
>>> link:
>>> 2009-11-04 16:50:44 [5057] [6] DEBUG: SMPP PDU 0x9743758 dump:
>>> 2009-11-04 16:50:44 [5057] [6] DEBUG:   type_name: enquire_link
>>> 2009-11-04 16:50:44 [5057] [6] DEBUG:   command_id: 21 = 0x00000015
>>> 2009-11-04 16:50:44 [5057] [6] DEBUG:   command_status: 0 = 0x00000000
>>> 2009-11-04 16:50:44 [5057] [6] DEBUG:   sequence_number: 28 = 0x0000001c
>>> 2009-11-04 16:50:44 [5057] [6] DEBUG: SMPP PDU dump ends.
>>>
>>> I`m just doubting because I had some "connection reset" errors.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>
>
>
>


Re: SMSC name conflict???

by elthox :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

Thanks Alvaro but its a misundesrtanding. ITs not a matter of SMSC provider. Im just thinking from kannel point of view, considering the example I gave above.
Actually both conenctions are live and running, but sometimes having interruption, connection reset by peer. When sending the enquiry link, kannel prints smsc name

2009-11-04 18:28:44 [5057] [6] DEBUG: SMPP[gprs-bill]: Sending enquire link:
2009-11-04 18:28:44 [5057] [6] DEBUG: SMPP PDU 0x973d3a8 dump:
2009-11-04 18:28:44 [5057] [6] DEBUG:   type_name: enquire_link
2009-11-04 18:28:44 [5057] [6] DEBUG:   command_id: 21 = 0x00000015
2009-11-04 18:28:44 [5057] [6] DEBUG:   command_status: 0 = 0x00000000
2009-11-04 18:28:44 [5057] [6] DEBUG:   sequence_number: 224 = 0x000000e0
2009-11-04 18:28:44 [5057] [6] DEBUG: SMPP PDU dump ends.

So by havving two processes by sending enqiry links or whatever with the same name gprs-bill, may be any problem?

THanks

On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 6:20 PM, Alvaro Cornejo <cornejo.alvaro@...> wrote:
Elton

I think it is more a problem from your SMSC provider. If they do allow
you to have 2 -or more- connections to the same port or not.

The connection resets can happen for multiple reasons including
problems on any of the peers, the network (Lan/Wan) , etc.

Hope helps


|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Envíe y Reciba Datos y mensajes de Texto (SMS) hacia y desde cualquier
celular y Nextel
en el Perú, México y en mas de 180 paises. Use aplicaciones 2 vias via
SMS y GPRS online
             Visitenos en www.perusms.NET www.smsglobal.com.mx y
www.pravcom.com



On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 11:56 AM, Elton Hoxha <elthox@...> wrote:
>
> More details:
>
> - a.conf
>
> group=smsc
> smsc=smpp
> smsc-id=gprs-bill
> interface-version=34
> host=10.1.7.21
> port=1600
> system-id=a
> smsc-password=a
> system-type=a
> transceiver-mode=true
>
> - b.conf
> group=smsc
> smsc=smpp
> smsc-id=gprs-bill
> interface-version=34
> host=10.1.7.21
> port=1600
> system-id=b
> smsc-password=b
> system-type=b
> transceiver-mode=true
>
> So, starting to bearerboxes (normally with different ports) may cause any
> problem if both conf files have same smsc-id?
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 5:43 PM, vijay shanker <vijay.shad@...> wrote:
>>
>> Can not be conformed.
>> How many connection your SMMP service provider supports?
>> Two bearer box may be running but on different ports. Try to find out or
>> give more relevant details.
>> Like what is your configuration? or what is the problem you have
>> encountered.
>> Regards,
>> Vijay Shanker Dubey
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 9:22 PM, Elton Hoxha <elthox@...> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi guys,
>>>
>>> Is there any possibility to have conflict between two bearerbox processes
>>> running in paralel, having separate smpp connection but same SMSC name??
>>> example: gprs-bill
>>>
>>> 2009-11-04 16:50:44 [5057] [6] DEBUG: SMPP[gprs-bill]: Sending enquire
>>> link:
>>> 2009-11-04 16:50:44 [5057] [6] DEBUG: SMPP PDU 0x9743758 dump:
>>> 2009-11-04 16:50:44 [5057] [6] DEBUG:   type_name: enquire_link
>>> 2009-11-04 16:50:44 [5057] [6] DEBUG:   command_id: 21 = 0x00000015
>>> 2009-11-04 16:50:44 [5057] [6] DEBUG:   command_status: 0 = 0x00000000
>>> 2009-11-04 16:50:44 [5057] [6] DEBUG:   sequence_number: 28 = 0x0000001c
>>> 2009-11-04 16:50:44 [5057] [6] DEBUG: SMPP PDU dump ends.
>>>
>>> I`m just doubting because I had some "connection reset" errors.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>
>
>
>


Re: SMSC name conflict???

by Nikos Balkanas :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

Some parts of this message have been removed. Learn more about Nabble's security policy.
Hi,
 
From BB's point of view each process is agnostic of the other. Each process has its own sockets and cannot read the other's. There can be no mixup.
 
BR,
Nikos
----- Original Message -----
From: elthox@...
Sent: Wednesday, November 04, 2009 7:30 PM
Subject: Re: SMSC name conflict???

Thanks Alvaro but its a misundesrtanding. ITs not a matter of SMSC provider. Im just thinking from kannel point of view, considering the example I gave above.
Actually both conenctions are live and running, but sometimes having interruption, connection reset by peer. When sending the enquiry link, kannel prints smsc name

2009-11-04 18:28:44 [5057] [6] DEBUG: SMPP[gprs-bill]: Sending enquire link:
2009-11-04 18:28:44 [5057] [6] DEBUG: SMPP PDU 0x973d3a8 dump:
2009-11-04 18:28:44 [5057] [6] DEBUG:   type_name: enquire_link
2009-11-04 18:28:44 [5057] [6] DEBUG:   command_id: 21 = 0x00000015
2009-11-04 18:28:44 [5057] [6] DEBUG:   command_status: 0 = 0x00000000
2009-11-04 18:28:44 [5057] [6] DEBUG:   sequence_number: 224 = 0x000000e0
2009-11-04 18:28:44 [5057] [6] DEBUG: SMPP PDU dump ends.

So by havving two processes by sending enqiry links or whatever with the same name gprs-bill, may be any problem?

THanks

On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 6:20 PM, Alvaro Cornejo <cornejo.alvaro@...> wrote:
Elton

I think it is more a problem from your SMSC provider. If they do allow
you to have 2 -or more- connections to the same port or not.

The connection resets can happen for multiple reasons including
problems on any of the peers, the network (Lan/Wan) , etc.

Hope helps


|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Envνe y Reciba Datos y mensajes de Texto (SMS) hacia y desde cualquier
celular y Nextel
en el Perϊ, Mιxico y en mas de 180 paises. Use aplicaciones 2 vias via
SMS y GPRS online
             Visitenos en www.perusms.NET www.smsglobal.com.mx y
www.pravcom.com



On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 11:56 AM, Elton Hoxha <elthox@...> wrote:

>
> More details:
>
> - a.conf
>
> group=smsc
> smsc=smpp
> smsc-id=gprs-bill
> interface-version=34
> host=10.1.7.21
> port=1600
> system-id=a
> smsc-password=a
> system-type=a
> transceiver-mode=true
>
> - b.conf
> group=smsc
> smsc=smpp
> smsc-id=gprs-bill
> interface-version=34
> host=10.1.7.21
> port=1600
> system-id=b
> smsc-password=b
> system-type=b
> transceiver-mode=true
>
> So, starting to bearerboxes (normally with different ports) may cause any
> problem if both conf files have same smsc-id?
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 5:43 PM, vijay shanker <vijay.shad@...> wrote:
>>
>> Can not be conformed.
>> How many connection your SMMP service provider supports?
>> Two bearer box may be running but on different ports. Try to find out or
>> give more relevant details.
>> Like what is your configuration? or what is the problem you have
>> encountered.
>> Regards,
>> Vijay Shanker Dubey
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 9:22 PM, Elton Hoxha <elthox@...> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi guys,
>>>
>>> Is there any possibility to have conflict between two bearerbox processes
>>> running in paralel, having separate smpp connection but same SMSC name??
>>> example: gprs-bill
>>>
>>> 2009-11-04 16:50:44 [5057] [6] DEBUG: SMPP[gprs-bill]: Sending enquire
>>> link:
>>> 2009-11-04 16:50:44 [5057] [6] DEBUG: SMPP PDU 0x9743758 dump:
>>> 2009-11-04 16:50:44 [5057] [6] DEBUG:   type_name: enquire_link
>>> 2009-11-04 16:50:44 [5057] [6] DEBUG:   command_id: 21 = 0x00000015
>>> 2009-11-04 16:50:44 [5057] [6] DEBUG:   command_status: 0 = 0x00000000
>>> 2009-11-04 16:50:44 [5057] [6] DEBUG:   sequence_number: 28 = 0x0000001c
>>> 2009-11-04 16:50:44 [5057] [6] DEBUG: SMPP PDU dump ends.
>>>
>>> I`m just doubting because I had some "connection reset" errors.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>
>
>
>