|
View:
New views
6 Messages
—
Rating Filter:
Alert me
|
|
|
SWF9 compiler option missing from 4.7.x nightly buildHi all,
I just downloaded the 4.7.x nightly, and tried to compile to SWF9. Got the following error: org.openlaszlo.sc.CompilerError: Errors from compiler, output file not created I then noticed that the SWF9 option is missing from the compiler options at the bottom of the page. Is this a bug, or is SWF9 no longer a valid compile target in 4.7? -Antun |
|
|
Re: SWF9 compiler option missing from 4.7.x nightly buildWe don't build the LFC libraries for swf9 by default anymore in trunk, and recommend using swf10 exclusively.
Do really need to generate swf9 format, or will swf10 be OK for your application ? The compiler can still generate swf9 files, if it's important to. On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 1:42 PM, Antun Karlovac <antun@...> wrote: Hi all, -- Henry Minsky Software Architect hminsky@... |
|
|
Re: SWF9 compiler option missing from 4.7.x nightly buildHi Henry,
Yes, I do still need to generate SWF9. The reason is that that the SWF10 player is less prevalent than the SWF9 one. Can I take the nightly build that I downloaded and do something to it to make the SWF9 LFC libraries appear? Or would that require a change to the OL and a rebuild? -Antun Henry Minsky wrote: > We don't build the LFC libraries for swf9 by default anymore in trunk, > and recommend using swf10 exclusively. > > Do really need to generate swf9 format, or will swf10 be OK for your > application ? > The compiler can still generate swf9 files, if it's important to. > > > > On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 1:42 PM, Antun Karlovac <antun@... > <mailto:antun@...>> wrote: > > Hi all, > > I just downloaded the 4.7.x nightly, and tried to compile to SWF9. > Got the following error: > > org.openlaszlo.sc.CompilerError: Errors from compiler, output file > not created > > I then noticed that the SWF9 option is missing from the compiler > options at the bottom of the page. > > Is this a bug, or is SWF9 no longer a valid compile target in 4.7? > > -Antun > > > > > -- > Henry Minsky > Software Architect > hminsky@... <mailto:hminsky@...> > > |
|
|
Re: SWF9 compiler option missing from 4.7.x nightly buildI think I can just send you the swf9 versions of the LFC (debug, and non debug), and it should work.
Try these ones for now, they are a couple of changes newer than the last nightly but should work for you for development, and we can set the nightly builds to build swf9 LFC's by default again. Put the attached files in lps/includes/lfc directory If building from source, the "build.lfc.runtime.swf9 " option in build.properties needs to be set to true when the LPS server is built On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 1:53 PM, Antun Karlovac <antun@...> wrote: Hi Henry, -- Henry Minsky Software Architect hminsky@... |
|
|
Re: SWF9 compiler option missing from 4.7.x nightly buildHey Henry and Max,
I got my code updated to SWF9 today. Dropping in the SWF9 LFCs allowed me to run the app in the 4.7.x nightly build. The fix that Max made to history now appears to work perfectly in SWF9! Yay! I filed a bug to request that SWF9 be re-enabled in trunk: http://openlaszlo.org/jira/browse/LPP-8569 Thanks for your help! -Antun Henry Minsky wrote: > I think I can just send you the swf9 versions of the LFC (debug, and non > debug), and it should work. > > Try these ones for now, they are a couple of changes newer than the last > nightly but > should work for you for development, and we can set the nightly builds > to build swf9 LFC's by default again. > > Put the attached files in lps/includes/lfc directory > > > > > If building from source, the "build.lfc.runtime.swf9 " option in > build.properties needs to be set to true when the LPS server is built > > > On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 1:53 PM, Antun Karlovac <antun@... > <mailto:antun@...>> wrote: > > Hi Henry, > > Yes, I do still need to generate SWF9. The reason is that that the > SWF10 player is less prevalent than the SWF9 one. > > Can I take the nightly build that I downloaded and do something to > it to make the SWF9 LFC libraries appear? Or would that require a > change to the OL and a rebuild? > > -Antun > > Henry Minsky wrote: > > We don't build the LFC libraries for swf9 by default anymore in > trunk, and recommend using swf10 exclusively. > > Do really need to generate swf9 format, or will swf10 be OK for > your application ? > The compiler can still generate swf9 files, if it's important to. > > > > On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 1:42 PM, Antun Karlovac > <antun@... <mailto:antun@...> > <mailto:antun@... > <mailto:antun@...>>> wrote: > > Hi all, > > I just downloaded the 4.7.x nightly, and tried to compile to > SWF9. > Got the following error: > > org.openlaszlo.sc.CompilerError: Errors from compiler, output > file > not created > > I then noticed that the SWF9 option is missing from the compiler > options at the bottom of the page. > > Is this a bug, or is SWF9 no longer a valid compile target in > 4.7? > > -Antun > > > > > -- > Henry Minsky > Software Architect > hminsky@... <mailto:hminsky@...> > <mailto:hminsky@... > <mailto:hminsky@...>> > > > > > > -- > Henry Minsky > Software Architect > hminsky@... <mailto:hminsky@...> > > |
|
|
Re: SWF9 compiler option missing from 4.7.x nightly buildThanks for filing the bug, Antun.
Tucker has already checked in a fix and is testing now. -- Amy On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 1:45 PM, Antun Karlovac <antun@...> wrote: > Hey Henry and Max, > > I got my code updated to SWF9 today. Dropping in the SWF9 LFCs allowed me to > run the app in the 4.7.x nightly build. > > The fix that Max made to history now appears to work perfectly in SWF9! Yay! > > I filed a bug to request that SWF9 be re-enabled in trunk: > http://openlaszlo.org/jira/browse/LPP-8569 > > Thanks for your help! > > -Antun > > > > > Henry Minsky wrote: >> >> I think I can just send you the swf9 versions of the LFC (debug, and non >> debug), and it should work. >> >> Try these ones for now, they are a couple of changes newer than the last >> nightly but >> should work for you for development, and we can set the nightly builds to >> build swf9 LFC's by default again. >> >> Put the attached files in lps/includes/lfc directory >> >> >> >> >> If building from source, the "build.lfc.runtime.swf9 " option in >> build.properties needs to be set to true when the LPS server is built >> >> >> On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 1:53 PM, Antun Karlovac <antun@... >> <mailto:antun@...>> wrote: >> >> Hi Henry, >> >> Yes, I do still need to generate SWF9. The reason is that that the >> SWF10 player is less prevalent than the SWF9 one. >> >> Can I take the nightly build that I downloaded and do something to >> it to make the SWF9 LFC libraries appear? Or would that require a >> change to the OL and a rebuild? >> >> -Antun >> >> Henry Minsky wrote: >> >> We don't build the LFC libraries for swf9 by default anymore in >> trunk, and recommend using swf10 exclusively. >> >> Do really need to generate swf9 format, or will swf10 be OK for >> your application ? >> The compiler can still generate swf9 files, if it's important to. >> >> >> >> On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 1:42 PM, Antun Karlovac >> <antun@... <mailto:antun@...> >> <mailto:antun@... >> <mailto:antun@...>>> wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> I just downloaded the 4.7.x nightly, and tried to compile to >> SWF9. >> Got the following error: >> >> org.openlaszlo.sc.CompilerError: Errors from compiler, output >> file >> not created >> >> I then noticed that the SWF9 option is missing from the compiler >> options at the bottom of the page. >> >> Is this a bug, or is SWF9 no longer a valid compile target in >> 4.7? >> >> -Antun >> >> >> >> >> -- Henry Minsky >> Software Architect >> hminsky@... <mailto:hminsky@...> >> <mailto:hminsky@... >> <mailto:hminsky@...>> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Henry Minsky >> Software Architect >> hminsky@... <mailto:hminsky@...> >> >> > |
| Free embeddable forum powered by Nabble | Forum Help |