|
View:
New views
2 Messages
—
Rating Filter:
Alert me
|
|
|
Same Key - different contentI have yet another question. This is more in regard to
the file system. From what i've read it is not clear to me what happens if different content is inserted under the same keyword.
How does gnunet handle this situation if it encounters a key that exists already? Does it just update? Or does it store two entries under the same hash. If i was to insert something with the keys "gnunet" and "network"
and later something with "apache" and "network". what happens for the "network" entry? what would a search for "network" yield? would it return both entries or just one?
how about returning replies to such requests, return all results, gaining trust multiple times for just one request? this couldn't really work since there are routing entries in between that get removed after the first reply.
or just returning the freshest entry? well as i say i lost it a bit here. Anyway to this, are there already plans or ideas to allow for better search capabilities? Exact key words and you'll never find what you are after ....
Good example for it in the http://gnunet.org/download/esed.pdf page 3 lines 3 and 10 tx leo _______________________________________________ GNUnet-developers mailing list GNUnet-developers@... http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnunet-developers |
|
|
Re: Same Key - different contentOn Friday 19 June 2009 04:02:06 pm leo stone wrote:
> I have yet another question. This is more in regard to the file system. > > From what i've read it is not clear to me what happens > if different content is inserted under the same keyword. > > How does gnunet handle this situation if it encounters a key that exists > already? Does it just update? > Or does it store two entries under the same hash. Stores two entries. > If i was to insert something with the keys "gnunet" and "network" > and later something with "apache" and "network". > > what happens for the "network" entry? what would a search for "network" > yield? > would it return both entries or just one? Both. > how about returning replies to such requests, return all results, gaining > trust multiple times for just one request? First responder gains trust, rest goes home empty-handed (but they don't know that). > this couldn't really work since there are routing entries in between that > get removed after the first reply. No, peers mark them as "removable" if they are short on space (and reset trust-to-be-earned to zero), but they don't entirely remove the entry immediately. > or just returning the freshest entry? well as i say i lost it a bit here. No, if a particular peer has multiple, one or more randomly-selected entries are returned. > Anyway to this, are there already plans or ideas to allow for better > search capabilities? > Exact key words and you'll never find what you are after .... Yes, doing approximate searches would be very nice, but given that we like to keep our search terms private and essentially only transmit a hash of the search term, this would be really hard (but nice). Good line of research for those working on hash functions... Best, Christian _______________________________________________ GNUnet-developers mailing list GNUnet-developers@... http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnunet-developers |
| Free embeddable forum powered by Nabble | Forum Help |