Scorecard BOF and resulting WG
|
View:
New views
8 Messages
—
Rating Filter:
Alert me
|
 |
Scorecard BOF and resulting WG
by mmmay
::
Rate this Message:
Hi everyone, A "Scorecard Working Group" formed at the Paris Conference to tackle the issue of how to improve upon the current Core/Provisional/Contrib Tool Status system and its criteria. The goal is to produce a Tool Scorecard and a Service Scorecard, which will provide the release team with guidance on what to include in a release, and organizations deploying Sakai a comparative evaluation of tools' and services' capabilities. Additionally, there is a goal of defining a set of criteria with tool/service evaluation being performed for the 2.6 release. During the meeting in Paris, the group defined possible several dimensions for the score card. Notes of this meeting can be found on the WG's confluence space at: http://confluence.sakaiproject.org/confluence/x/FwDfAQ. Additional participation is welcomed from all in the community. If you are interested in participating, please join the WG on collab by using the MyWorkspace Membership tool. To join follow these steps * Log into https://collab.sakaiproject.org/portal * Choose the Membership tool * Select the 'Joinable sites' link * Search on 'WG: Scorecard' and click join Thanks! Megan ---------------------- This automatic notification message was sent by Sakai Collab (https://collab.sakaiproject.org//portal) from the DG: Development (a.k.a. sakai-dev) site. You can modify how you receive notifications at My Workspace > Preferences. |
|
|
|
|
|
Proposed Scorecard Evaluation
by Mark Norton
::
Rate this Message:
I have created an initial scorecard with evaluation based on Megan's notes at: http://confluence.sakaiproject.org/confluence/display/SCORE/Scorecard+Evaluation Please jump in and add comments. - Mark Norton May, Megan Marie wrote: > Jon, > Yes, this scorecard would have a dimension that would rate the > accessibility of a tool to people with disabilities. The definition of > the elements on the scorecard is an activity that is going to require > the input of folks with expertise in many different areas. > > If you are at all interested, I encourage you to join the collab site. > Megan > > -----Original Message----- > From: Jon Gunderson [mailto:jongund@...] > Sent: Monday, July 14, 2008 4:58 PM > To: May, Megan Marie; sakai-dev@...; > sakai-qa@...; Sakai Accessibility WG; Sakai UI UI; > sakai-user > Subject: Re: Scorecard BOF and resulting WG > > I this type of resource be place to rate the accessibility of a > feature to people with disabilities? > > Jon > > > ---- Original message ---- > >Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2008 15:59:43 -0400 > >From: "May, Megan Marie" <mmmay@...> > >Subject: Scorecard BOF and resulting WG > >To: "sakai-dev@..." > <sakai-dev@...>, > "sakai-qa@..." <sakai-qa@...>, > Sakai Accessibility WG <accessibility@...>, Sakai > UI UI <sakai-dg-ui@...>, sakai-user > <sakai-user@...> > > > > Hi everyone, > > > > > > > > A "Scorecard Working Group" formed at the Paris > > Conference to tackle the issue of how to improve > > upon the current Core/Provisional/Contrib Tool > > Status system and its criteria. The goal is to > > produce a Tool Scorecard and a Service Scorecard, > > which will provide the release team with guidance on > > what to include in a release, and organizations > > deploying Sakai a comparative evaluation of tools' > > and services' capabilities. Additionally, there > > is a goal of defining a set of criteria with > > tool/service evaluation being performed for the 2.6 > > release. During the meeting in Paris, the group > > defined possible several dimensions for the score > > card. Notes of this meeting can be found on the > > WG's confluence space at: > > http://confluence.sakaiproject.org/confluence/x/FwDfAQ. > > > > > > > > Additional participation is welcomed from all in the > > community. If you are interested in participating, > > please join the WG on collab by using the > > MyWorkspace Membership tool. To join follow these > > steps > > > > > > > > . Log into > > https://collab.sakaiproject.org/portal > > > > . Choose the Membership tool > > > > . Select the `Joinable sites' link > > > > . Search on `WG: Scorecard' and click join > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > Megan > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------ > > > > This automatic notification message was sent by > > Sakai Collab > > (https://collab.sakaiproject.org//portal) from the > > WG: Accessibility site. > > You can modify how you receive notifications at My > > Workspace > Preferences. > Jon Gunderson, Ph.D. > Coordinator Information Technology Accessibility > Disability Resources and Educational Services > > Rehabilitation Education Center > Room 86 > 1207 S. Oak Street > Champaign, Illinois 61821 > > Voice: (217) 244-5870 > > WWW: http://www.cita.uiuc.edu/ > WWW: https://netfiles.uiuc.edu/jongund/www/ > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > This automatic notification message was sent by Sakai Collab > (https://collab.sakaiproject.org//portal) from the DG: User site. > You can modify how you receive notifications at My Workspace > > Preferences. > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com > Version: 8.0.138 / Virus Database: 270.4.11/1553 - Release Date: 7/15/2008 5:48 AM ---------------------- This automatic notification message was sent by Sakai Collab (https://collab.sakaiproject.org//portal) from the DG: Development (a.k.a. sakai-dev) site. You can modify how you receive notifications at My Workspace > Preferences. |
|
|
RE: Proposed Scorecard Evaluation
by Peter Knoop
::
Rate this Message:
I'd also like to see the "Scorecard Items" defined. Even during the BOF in Paris it was clear that folks have different views on what was meant by some of these items. For those filling out the scorecard or those trying to make sense of it as a metric, those definitions will be important as well. They don't have to be on the top-level view of scorecard, however, they should be captured and link to somewhere. -peter From: Mark Norton [mailto:markjnorton@...] Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2008 5:26 PM To: May, Megan Marie Cc: sakai-dev@...; sakai-qa@...; Sakai Accessibility WG; Sakai UI UI; sakai-user Subject: Proposed Scorecard Evaluation I have created an initial scorecard with evaluation based on Megan's notes at: http://confluence.sakaiproject.org/confluence/display/SCORE/Scorecard+Ev aluation Please jump in and add comments. - Mark Norton May, Megan Marie wrote: > Jon, > Yes, this scorecard would have a dimension that would rate the > accessibility of a tool to people with disabilities. The definition of > the elements on the scorecard is an activity that is going to require > the input of folks with expertise in many different areas. > > If you are at all interested, I encourage you to join the collab site. > Megan > > -----Original Message----- > From: Jon Gunderson [mailto:jongund@...] > Sent: Monday, July 14, 2008 4:58 PM > To: May, Megan Marie; sakai-dev@...; > sakai-qa@...; Sakai Accessibility WG; Sakai UI UI; > sakai-user > Subject: Re: Scorecard BOF and resulting WG > > I this type of resource be place to rate the accessibility of a > feature to people with disabilities? > > Jon > > > ---- Original message ---- > >Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2008 15:59:43 -0400 > >From: "May, Megan Marie" <mmmay@...> > >Subject: Scorecard BOF and resulting WG > >To: "sakai-dev@..." > <sakai-dev@...>, > "sakai-qa@..." <sakai-qa@...>, > Sakai Accessibility WG <accessibility@...>, Sakai > UI UI <sakai-dg-ui@...>, sakai-user > <sakai-user@...> > > > > Hi everyone, > > > > > > > > A "Scorecard Working Group" formed at the Paris > > Conference to tackle the issue of how to improve > > upon the current Core/Provisional/Contrib Tool > > Status system and its criteria. The goal is to > > produce a Tool Scorecard and a Service Scorecard, > > which will provide the release team with guidance on > > what to include in a release, and organizations > > deploying Sakai a comparative evaluation of tools' > > and services' capabilities. Additionally, there > > is a goal of defining a set of criteria with > > tool/service evaluation being performed for the 2.6 > > release. During the meeting in Paris, the group > > defined possible several dimensions for the score > > card. Notes of this meeting can be found on the > > WG's confluence space at: > > http://confluence.sakaiproject.org/confluence/x/FwDfAQ. > > > > > > > > Additional participation is welcomed from all in the > > community. If you are interested in participating, > > please join the WG on collab by using the > > MyWorkspace Membership tool. To join follow these > > steps > > > > > > > > . Log into > > https://collab.sakaiproject.org/portal > > > > . Choose the Membership tool > > > > . Select the `Joinable sites' link > > > > . Search on `WG: Scorecard' and click join > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > Megan > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------ > > > > This automatic notification message was sent by > > Sakai Collab > > (https://collab.sakaiproject.org//portal > > WG: Accessibility site. > > You can modify how you receive notifications at My > > Workspace > Preferences. > Jon Gunderson, Ph.D. > Coordinator Information Technology Accessibility > Disability Resources and Educational Services > > Rehabilitation Education Center > Room 86 > 1207 S. Oak Street > Champaign, Illinois 61821 > > Voice: (217) 244-5870 > > WWW: http://www.cita.uiuc.edu/ > WWW: https://netfiles.uiuc.edu/jongund/www/ > > > > > This automatic notification message was sent by Sakai Collab > (https://collab.sakaiproject.org//portal <https://collab.sakaiproject.org/portal> ) from the DG: User site. > You can modify how you receive notifications at My Workspace > > Preferences. > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com > Version: 8.0.138 / Virus Database: 270.4.11/1553 - Release Date: 7/15/2008 5:48 AM ________________________________ This automatic notification message was sent by Sakai Collab (https://collab.sakaiproject.org//portal <https://collab.sakaiproject.org/portal> ) from the DG: User Experience site. You can modify how you receive notifications at My Workspace > Preferences. ---------------------- This automatic notification message was sent by Sakai Collab (https://collab.sakaiproject.org//portal) from the DG: Development (a.k.a. sakai-dev) site. You can modify how you receive notifications at My Workspace > Preferences. |
|
|
Re: Proposed Scorecard Evaluation
by Mark Norton
::
Rate this Message:
This is definitely worth doing, Peter. I had trouble understanding some of the items from the notes. Definitions would go a long way towards refining the scorecard. Do you want me to take a whack at that? - Mark Knoop, Peter wrote: > > I’d also like to see the “Scorecard Items” defined. Even during the > BOF in Paris it was clear that folks have different views on what was > meant by some of these items. For those filling out the scorecard or > those trying to make sense of it as a metric, those definitions will > be important as well. They don’t have to be on the top-level view of > scorecard, however, they should be captured and link to somewhere. > > -peter > > *From:* Mark Norton [mailto:markjnorton@...] > *Sent:* Tuesday, July 15, 2008 5:26 PM > *To:* May, Megan Marie > *Cc:* sakai-dev@...; > sakai-qa@...; Sakai Accessibility WG; Sakai UI UI; > sakai-user > *Subject:* Proposed Scorecard Evaluation > > I have created an initial scorecard with evaluation based on Megan's > notes at: > http://confluence.sakaiproject.org/confluence/display/SCORE/Scorecard+Evaluation > > > Please jump in and add comments. > > - Mark Norton > > May, Megan Marie wrote: > > Jon, > > Yes, this scorecard would have a dimension that would rate the > > accessibility of a tool to people with disabilities. The definition of > > the elements on the scorecard is an activity that is going to require > > the input of folks with expertise in many different areas. > > > > If you are at all interested, I encourage you to join the collab site. > > Megan > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Jon Gunderson [mailto:jongund@...] > > Sent: Monday, July 14, 2008 4:58 PM > > To: May, Megan Marie; sakai-dev@...; > > sakai-qa@...; Sakai Accessibility WG; Sakai UI UI; > > sakai-user > > Subject: Re: Scorecard BOF and resulting WG > > > > I this type of resource be place to rate the accessibility of a > > feature to people with disabilities? > > > > Jon > > > > > > ---- Original message ---- > > >Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2008 15:59:43 -0400 > > >From: "May, Megan Marie" <mmmay@...> > > >Subject: Scorecard BOF and resulting WG > > >To: "sakai-dev@..." > > <sakai-dev@...>, > > "sakai-qa@..." <sakai-qa@...>, > > Sakai Accessibility WG <accessibility@...>, Sakai > > UI UI <sakai-dg-ui@...>, sakai-user > > <sakai-user@...> > > > > > > Hi everyone, > > > > > > > > > > > > A "Scorecard Working Group" formed at the Paris > > > Conference to tackle the issue of how to improve > > > upon the current Core/Provisional/Contrib Tool > > > Status system and its criteria. The goal is to > > > produce a Tool Scorecard and a Service Scorecard, > > > which will provide the release team with guidance on > > > what to include in a release, and organizations > > > deploying Sakai a comparative evaluation of tools' > > > and services' capabilities. Additionally, there > > > is a goal of defining a set of criteria with > > > tool/service evaluation being performed for the 2.6 > > > release. During the meeting in Paris, the group > > > defined possible several dimensions for the score > > > card. Notes of this meeting can be found on the > > > WG's confluence space at: > > > http://confluence.sakaiproject.org/confluence/x/FwDfAQ. > > > > > > > > > > > > Additional participation is welcomed from all in the > > > community. If you are interested in participating, > > > please join the WG on collab by using the > > > MyWorkspace Membership tool. To join follow these > > > steps > > > > > > > > > > > > . Log into > > > https://collab.sakaiproject.org/portal > > > > > > . Choose the Membership tool > > > > > > . Select the `Joinable sites' link > > > > > > . Search on `WG: Scorecard' and click join > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > Megan > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------ > > > > > > This automatic notification message was sent by > > > Sakai Collab > > > (https://collab.sakaiproject.org//portal > <https://collab.sakaiproject.org/portal>) from the > > > WG: Accessibility site. > > > You can modify how you receive notifications at My > > > Workspace > Preferences. > > Jon Gunderson, Ph.D. > > Coordinator Information Technology Accessibility > > Disability Resources and Educational Services > > > > Rehabilitation Education Center > > Room 86 > > 1207 S. Oak Street > > Champaign, Illinois 61821 > > > > Voice: (217) 244-5870 > > > > WWW: http://www.cita.uiuc.edu/ > > WWW: https://netfiles.uiuc.edu/jongund/www/ > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > This automatic notification message was sent by Sakai Collab > > (https://collab.sakaiproject.org//portal > <https://collab.sakaiproject.org/portal>) from the DG: User site. > > You can modify how you receive notifications at My Workspace > > > Preferences. > > No virus found in this incoming message. > > Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com > > Version: 8.0.138 / Virus Database: 270.4.11/1553 - Release Date: > 7/15/2008 5:48 AM > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > This automatic notification message was sent by Sakai Collab > (https://collab.sakaiproject.org//portal > <https://collab.sakaiproject.org/portal>) from the DG: User Experience > site. > You can modify how you receive notifications at My Workspace > > Preferences. > > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com > Version: 8.0.138 / Virus Database: 270.4.11/1553 - Release Date: 7/15/2008 5:48 AM > ---------------------- This automatic notification message was sent by Sakai Collab (https://collab.sakaiproject.org//portal) from the DG: Development (a.k.a. sakai-dev) site. You can modify how you receive notifications at My Workspace > Preferences. |
|
|
RE: Proposed Scorecard Evaluation
by Peter Knoop
::
Rate this Message:
Sure go for it, Mark. I would also encourage anyone else contributing to the page to note any differences they have with definitions for items they are commenting on, or to add their definition for any that are missing one. -peter > -----Original Message----- > From: Mark Norton [mailto:markjnorton@...] > Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2008 10:26 AM > To: Knoop, Peter > Cc: May, Megan Marie; sakai-dev@...; sakai- > qa@...; Sakai Accessibility WG; Sakai UI UI; sakai- > user > Subject: Re: Proposed Scorecard Evaluation > > This is definitely worth doing, Peter. I had trouble understanding some > of the items from the notes. Definitions would go a long way towards > refining the scorecard. Do you want me to take a whack at that? > > - Mark > > Knoop, Peter wrote: > > > > I'd also like to see the "Scorecard Items" defined. Even during the > > BOF in Paris it was clear that folks have different views on what was > > meant by some of these items. For those filling out the scorecard or > > those trying to make sense of it as a metric, those definitions will > > be important as well. They don't have to be on the top-level view of > > scorecard, however, they should be captured and link to somewhere. > > > > -peter > > > > *From:* Mark Norton [mailto:markjnorton@...] > > *Sent:* Tuesday, July 15, 2008 5:26 PM > > *To:* May, Megan Marie > > *Cc:* sakai-dev@...; > > sakai-qa@...; Sakai Accessibility WG; Sakai UI > UI; > > sakai-user > > *Subject:* Proposed Scorecard Evaluation > > > > I have created an initial scorecard with evaluation based on Megan's > > notes at: > > > > valuation > > > > > > Please jump in and add comments. > > > > - Mark Norton > > > > May, Megan Marie wrote: > > > Jon, > > > Yes, this scorecard would have a dimension that would rate the > > > accessibility of a tool to people with disabilities. The > of > > > the elements on the scorecard is an activity that is going to > require > > > the input of folks with expertise in many different areas. > > > > > > If you are at all interested, I encourage you to join the collab > site. > > > Megan > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Jon Gunderson [mailto:jongund@...] > > > Sent: Monday, July 14, 2008 4:58 PM > > > To: May, Megan Marie; sakai-dev@...; > > > sakai-qa@...; Sakai Accessibility WG; Sakai UI > UI; > > > sakai-user > > > Subject: Re: Scorecard BOF and resulting WG > > > > > > I this type of resource be place to rate the accessibility of a > > > feature to people with disabilities? > > > > > > Jon > > > > > > > > > ---- Original message ---- > > > >Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2008 15:59:43 -0400 > > > >From: "May, Megan Marie" <mmmay@...> > > > >Subject: Scorecard BOF and resulting WG > > > >To: "sakai-dev@..." > > > <sakai-dev@...>, > > > "sakai-qa@..." <sakai- > qa@...>, > > > Sakai Accessibility WG <accessibility@...>, > Sakai > > > UI UI <sakai-dg-ui@...>, sakai-user > > > <sakai-user@...> > > > > > > > > Hi everyone, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > A "Scorecard Working Group" formed at the Paris > > > > Conference to tackle the issue of how to improve > > > > upon the current Core/Provisional/Contrib Tool > > > > Status system and its criteria. The goal is to > > > > produce a Tool Scorecard and a Service Scorecard, > > > > which will provide the release team with guidance on > > > > what to include in a release, and organizations > > > > deploying Sakai a comparative evaluation of tools' > > > > and services' capabilities. Additionally, there > > > > is a goal of defining a set of criteria with > > > > tool/service evaluation being performed for the 2.6 > > > > release. During the meeting in Paris, the group > > > > defined possible several dimensions for the score > > > > card. Notes of this meeting can be found on the > > > > WG's confluence space at: > > > > http://confluence.sakaiproject.org/confluence/x/FwDfAQ. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Additional participation is welcomed from all in the > > > > community. If you are interested in participating, > > > > please join the WG on collab by using the > > > > MyWorkspace Membership tool. To join follow these > > > > steps > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > . Log into > > > > https://collab.sakaiproject.org/portal > > > > > > > > . Choose the Membership tool > > > > > > > > . Select the `Joinable sites' link > > > > > > > > . Search on `WG: Scorecard' and click join > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > > > Megan > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------ > > > > > > > > This automatic notification message was sent by > > > > Sakai Collab > > > > (https://collab.sakaiproject.org//portal > > <https://collab.sakaiproject.org/portal>) from the > > > > WG: Accessibility site. > > > > You can modify how you receive notifications at My > > > > Workspace > Preferences. > > > Jon Gunderson, Ph.D. > > > Coordinator Information Technology Accessibility > > > Disability Resources and Educational Services > > > > > > Rehabilitation Education Center > > > Room 86 > > > 1207 S. Oak Street > > > Champaign, Illinois 61821 > > > > > > Voice: (217) 244-5870 > > > > > > WWW: http://www.cita.uiuc.edu/ > > > WWW: https://netfiles.uiuc.edu/jongund/www/ > > > > > > > > > > > > --- > > > > > > This automatic notification message was sent by Sakai Collab > > > (https://collab.sakaiproject.org//portal > > <https://collab.sakaiproject.org/portal>) from the DG: User site. > > > You can modify how you receive notifications at My Workspace > > > > Preferences. > > > No virus found in this incoming message. > > > Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com > > > Version: 8.0.138 / Virus Database: 270.4.11/1553 - Release Date: > > 7/15/2008 5:48 AM > > > > > --- > > > > > > This automatic notification message was sent by Sakai Collab > > (https://collab.sakaiproject.org//portal > > <https://collab.sakaiproject.org/portal>) from the DG: User > Experience > > site. > > You can modify how you receive notifications at My Workspace > > > Preferences. > > > > No virus found in this incoming message. > > Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com > > Version: 8.0.138 / Virus Database: 270.4.11/1553 - Release Date: > 7/15/2008 5:48 AM > > ---------------------- This automatic notification message was sent by Sakai Collab (https://collab.sakaiproject.org//portal) from the DG: Development (a.k.a. sakai-dev) site. You can modify how you receive notifications at My Workspace > Preferences. |
|
|
Re: Proposed Scorecard Evaluation
by Mark Norton
::
Rate this Message:
I have entered initial definitions for the scorecard items at: http://confluence.sakaiproject.org/confluence/display/SCORE/Scorecard+Item+Definitions These are very preliminary. Please comment, change, etc. I recommend that we drop item 1.5 as a duplicate of 1.2, define 2.5 (integration testing), and drop 2.16 as it is covered in code reviews. Megan should define what test plans are. Need some work around licensing, too. As time allows, I will write up some of the checklists, where they are defined elsewhere. - Mark Knoop, Peter wrote: > Sure go for it, Mark. I would also encourage anyone else contributing to > the page to note any differences they have with definitions for items > they are commenting on, or to add their definition for any that are > missing one. > > -peter > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Mark Norton [mailto:markjnorton@...] >> Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2008 10:26 AM >> To: Knoop, Peter >> Cc: May, Megan Marie; sakai-dev@...; sakai- >> qa@...; Sakai Accessibility WG; Sakai UI UI; >> > sakai- > >> user >> Subject: Re: Proposed Scorecard Evaluation >> >> This is definitely worth doing, Peter. I had trouble understanding >> > some > >> of the items from the notes. Definitions would go a long way towards >> refining the scorecard. Do you want me to take a whack at that? >> >> - Mark >> >> Knoop, Peter wrote: >> >>> I'd also like to see the "Scorecard Items" defined. Even during the >>> BOF in Paris it was clear that folks have different views on what >>> > was > >>> meant by some of these items. For those filling out the scorecard or >>> those trying to make sense of it as a metric, those definitions will >>> be important as well. They don't have to be on the top-level view of >>> scorecard, however, they should be captured and link to somewhere. >>> >>> -peter >>> >>> *From:* Mark Norton [mailto:markjnorton@...] >>> *Sent:* Tuesday, July 15, 2008 5:26 PM >>> *To:* May, Megan Marie >>> *Cc:* sakai-dev@...; >>> sakai-qa@...; Sakai Accessibility WG; Sakai UI >>> >> UI; >> >>> sakai-user >>> *Subject:* Proposed Scorecard Evaluation >>> >>> I have created an initial scorecard with evaluation based on Megan's >>> notes at: >>> >>> > http://confluence.sakaiproject.org/confluence/display/SCORE/Scorecard+E > >> valuation >> >>> Please jump in and add comments. >>> >>> - Mark Norton >>> >>> May, Megan Marie wrote: >>> >>>> Jon, >>>> Yes, this scorecard would have a dimension that would rate the >>>> accessibility of a tool to people with disabilities. The >>>> > definition > >> of >> >>>> the elements on the scorecard is an activity that is going to >>>> >> require >> >>>> the input of folks with expertise in many different areas. >>>> >>>> If you are at all interested, I encourage you to join the collab >>>> >> site. >> >>>> Megan >>>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: Jon Gunderson [mailto:jongund@...] >>>> Sent: Monday, July 14, 2008 4:58 PM >>>> To: May, Megan Marie; sakai-dev@...; >>>> sakai-qa@...; Sakai Accessibility WG; Sakai UI >>>> >> UI; >> >>>> sakai-user >>>> Subject: Re: Scorecard BOF and resulting WG >>>> >>>> I this type of resource be place to rate the accessibility of a >>>> feature to people with disabilities? >>>> >>>> Jon >>>> >>>> >>>> ---- Original message ---- >>>> >>>>> Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2008 15:59:43 -0400 >>>>> From: "May, Megan Marie" <mmmay@...> >>>>> Subject: Scorecard BOF and resulting WG >>>>> To: "sakai-dev@..." >>>>> >>>> <sakai-dev@...>, >>>> "sakai-qa@..." <sakai- >>>> >> qa@...>, >> >>>> Sakai Accessibility WG <accessibility@...>, >>>> >> Sakai >> >>>> UI UI <sakai-dg-ui@...>, sakai-user >>>> <sakai-user@...> >>>> >>>>> Hi everyone, >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> A "Scorecard Working Group" formed at the Paris >>>>> Conference to tackle the issue of how to improve >>>>> upon the current Core/Provisional/Contrib Tool >>>>> Status system and its criteria. The goal is to >>>>> produce a Tool Scorecard and a Service Scorecard, >>>>> which will provide the release team with guidance on >>>>> what to include in a release, and organizations >>>>> deploying Sakai a comparative evaluation of tools' >>>>> and services' capabilities. Additionally, there >>>>> is a goal of defining a set of criteria with >>>>> tool/service evaluation being performed for the 2.6 >>>>> release. During the meeting in Paris, the group >>>>> defined possible several dimensions for the score >>>>> card. Notes of this meeting can be found on the >>>>> WG's confluence space at: >>>>> http://confluence.sakaiproject.org/confluence/x/FwDfAQ. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Additional participation is welcomed from all in the >>>>> community. If you are interested in participating, >>>>> please join the WG on collab by using the >>>>> MyWorkspace Membership tool. To join follow these >>>>> steps >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> . Log into >>>>> https://collab.sakaiproject.org/portal >>>>> >>>>> . Choose the Membership tool >>>>> >>>>> . Select the `Joinable sites' link >>>>> >>>>> . Search on `WG: Scorecard' and click join >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Thanks! >>>>> >>>>> Megan >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ------------------------------------------------ >>>>> >>>>> This automatic notification message was sent by >>>>> Sakai Collab >>>>> (https://collab.sakaiproject.org//portal >>>>> >>> <https://collab.sakaiproject.org/portal>) from the >>> >>>>> WG: Accessibility site. >>>>> You can modify how you receive notifications at My >>>>> Workspace > Preferences. >>>>> >>>> Jon Gunderson, Ph.D. >>>> Coordinator Information Technology Accessibility >>>> Disability Resources and Educational Services >>>> >>>> Rehabilitation Education Center >>>> Room 86 >>>> 1207 S. Oak Street >>>> Champaign, Illinois 61821 >>>> >>>> Voice: (217) 244-5870 >>>> >>>> WWW: http://www.cita.uiuc.edu/ >>>> WWW: https://netfiles.uiuc.edu/jongund/www/ >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> --- >> >>>> This automatic notification message was sent by Sakai Collab >>>> (https://collab.sakaiproject.org//portal >>>> >>> <https://collab.sakaiproject.org/portal>) from the DG: User site. >>> >>>> You can modify how you receive notifications at My Workspace > >>>> Preferences. >>>> No virus found in this incoming message. >>>> Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com >>>> Version: 8.0.138 / Virus Database: 270.4.11/1553 - Release Date: >>>> >>> 7/15/2008 5:48 AM >>> >>> >>> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> --- >> >>> This automatic notification message was sent by Sakai Collab >>> (https://collab.sakaiproject.org//portal >>> <https://collab.sakaiproject.org/portal>) from the DG: User >>> >> Experience >> >>> site. >>> You can modify how you receive notifications at My Workspace > >>> Preferences. >>> >>> No virus found in this incoming message. >>> Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com >>> Version: 8.0.138 / Virus Database: 270.4.11/1553 - Release Date: >>> >> 7/15/2008 5:48 AM >> > > > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com > Version: 8.0.138 / Virus Database: 270.4.11/1553 - Release Date: 7/15/2008 5:48 AM > > > > ---------------------- This automatic notification message was sent by Sakai Collab (https://collab.sakaiproject.org//portal) from the DG: Development (a.k.a. sakai-dev) site. You can modify how you receive notifications at My Workspace > Preferences. |
|
|
Re: Proposed Scorecard Evaluation
by Daphnedmdp6
::
Rate this Message:
I'm all for combining Usability & Ease of Use (1.5 & 1.2). As I described in a comment on the definitions page, most definitions of usability include the ease of use as one of the components. I also added to the definition for the usability scorecard item to align it with the code review. A usability review team can evaluate against accepted Sakai and industry practices. We may also want to gain consensus on the evaluation method (also added a comment about this). Or perhaps that's a decision for the usability review team. I think the user testing scorecard item should similarly be the results of a formal user testing team. -Daphne On Jul 16, 2008, at 8:15 AM, Mark Norton wrote: > I have entered initial definitions for the scorecard items at: > http://confluence.sakaiproject.org/confluence/display/SCORE/Scorecard+Item+Definitions > > These are very preliminary. Please comment, change, etc. > > I recommend that we drop item 1.5 as a duplicate of 1.2, define 2.5 > (integration testing), and drop 2.16 as it is covered in code reviews. > Megan should define what test plans are. Need some work around > licensing, too. > > As time allows, I will write up some of the checklists, where they are > defined elsewhere. > > - Mark > > Knoop, Peter wrote: > > Sure go for it, Mark. I would also encourage anyone else > contributing to > > the page to note any differences they have with definitions for > items > > they are commenting on, or to add their definition for any that are > > missing one. > > > > -peter > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Mark Norton [mailto:markjnorton@...] > >> Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2008 10:26 AM > >> To: Knoop, Peter > >> Cc: May, Megan Marie; sakai-dev@...; sakai- > >> qa@...; Sakai Accessibility WG; Sakai UI UI; > >> > > sakai- > > > >> user > >> Subject: Re: Proposed Scorecard Evaluation > >> > >> This is definitely worth doing, Peter. I had trouble understanding > >> > > some > > > >> of the items from the notes. Definitions would go a long way > towards > >> refining the scorecard. Do you want me to take a whack at that? > >> > >> - Mark > >> > >> Knoop, Peter wrote: > >> > >>> I'd also like to see the "Scorecard Items" defined. Even during > the > >>> BOF in Paris it was clear that folks have different views on what > >>> > > was > > > >>> meant by some of these items. For those filling out the > scorecard or > >>> those trying to make sense of it as a metric, those definitions > will > >>> be important as well. They don't have to be on the top-level > view of > >>> scorecard, however, they should be captured and link to somewhere. > >>> > >>> -peter > >>> > >>> *From:* Mark Norton [mailto:markjnorton@...] > >>> *Sent:* Tuesday, July 15, 2008 5:26 PM > >>> *To:* May, Megan Marie > >>> *Cc:* sakai-dev@...; > >>> sakai-qa@...; Sakai Accessibility WG; Sakai UI > >>> > >> UI; > >> > >>> sakai-user > >>> *Subject:* Proposed Scorecard Evaluation > >>> > >>> I have created an initial scorecard with evaluation based on > Megan's > >>> notes at: > >>> > >>> > > http://confluence.sakaiproject.org/confluence/display/SCORE/Scorecard+E > > > >> valuation > >> > >>> Please jump in and add comments. > >>> > >>> - Mark Norton > >>> > >>> May, Megan Marie wrote: > >>> > >>>> Jon, > >>>> Yes, this scorecard would have a dimension that would rate the > >>>> accessibility of a tool to people with disabilities. The > >>>> > > definition > > > >> of > >> > >>>> the elements on the scorecard is an activity that is going to > >>>> > >> require > >> > >>>> the input of folks with expertise in many different areas. > >>>> > >>>> If you are at all interested, I encourage you to join the collab > >>>> > >> site. > >> > >>>> Megan > >>>> > >>>> -----Original Message----- > >>>> From: Jon Gunderson [mailto:jongund@...] > >>>> Sent: Monday, July 14, 2008 4:58 PM > >>>> To: May, Megan Marie; sakai-dev@...; > >>>> sakai-qa@...; Sakai Accessibility WG; Sakai > UI > >>>> > >> UI; > >> > >>>> sakai-user > >>>> Subject: Re: Scorecard BOF and resulting WG > >>>> > >>>> I this type of resource be place to rate the accessibility of a > >>>> feature to people with disabilities? > >>>> > >>>> Jon > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> ---- Original message ---- > >>>> > >>>>> Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2008 15:59:43 -0400 > >>>>> From: "May, Megan Marie" <mmmay@...> > >>>>> Subject: Scorecard BOF and resulting WG > >>>>> To: "sakai-dev@..." > >>>>> > >>>> <sakai-dev@...>, > >>>> "sakai-qa@..." <sakai- > >>>> > >> qa@...>, > >> > >>>> Sakai Accessibility WG <accessibility@...>, > >>>> > >> Sakai > >> > >>>> UI UI <sakai-dg-ui@...>, sakai-user > >>>> <sakai-user@...> > >>>> > >>>>> Hi everyone, > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> A "Scorecard Working Group" formed at the Paris > >>>>> Conference to tackle the issue of how to improve > >>>>> upon the current Core/Provisional/Contrib Tool > >>>>> Status system and its criteria. The goal is to > >>>>> produce a Tool Scorecard and a Service Scorecard, > >>>>> which will provide the release team with guidance on > >>>>> what to include in a release, and organizations > >>>>> deploying Sakai a comparative evaluation of tools' > >>>>> and services' capabilities. Additionally, there > >>>>> is a goal of defining a set of criteria with > >>>>> tool/service evaluation being performed for the 2.6 > >>>>> release. During the meeting in Paris, the group > >>>>> defined possible several dimensions for the score > >>>>> card. Notes of this meeting can be found on the > >>>>> WG's confluence space at: > >>>>> http://confluence.sakaiproject.org/confluence/x/FwDfAQ. > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> Additional participation is welcomed from all in the > >>>>> community. If you are interested in participating, > >>>>> please join the WG on collab by using the > >>>>> MyWorkspace Membership tool. To join follow these > >>>>> steps > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> . Log into > >>>>> https://collab.sakaiproject.org/portal > >>>>> > >>>>> . Choose the Membership tool > >>>>> > >>>>> . Select the `Joinable sites' link > >>>>> > >>>>> . Search on `WG: Scorecard' and click join > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> Thanks! > >>>>> > >>>>> Megan > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> ------------------------------------------------ > >>>>> > >>>>> This automatic notification message was sent by > >>>>> Sakai Collab > >>>>> (https://collab.sakaiproject.org//portal > >>>>> > >>> <https://collab.sakaiproject.org/portal>) from the > >>> > >>>>> WG: Accessibility site. > >>>>> You can modify how you receive notifications at My > >>>>> Workspace > Preferences. > >>>>> > >>>> Jon Gunderson, Ph.D. > >>>> Coordinator Information Technology Accessibility > >>>> Disability Resources and Educational Services > >>>> > >>>> Rehabilitation Education Center > >>>> Room 86 > >>>> 1207 S. Oak Street > >>>> Champaign, Illinois 61821 > >>>> > >>>> Voice: (217) 244-5870 > >>>> > >>>> WWW: http://www.cita.uiuc.edu/ > >>>> WWW: https://netfiles.uiuc.edu/jongund/www/ > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > >> --- > >> > >>>> This automatic notification message was sent by Sakai Collab > >>>> (https://collab.sakaiproject.org//portal > >>>> > >>> <https://collab.sakaiproject.org/portal>) from the DG: User site. > >>> > >>>> You can modify how you receive notifications at My Workspace > > >>>> Preferences. > >>>> No virus found in this incoming message. > >>>> Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com > >>>> Version: 8.0.138 / Virus Database: 270.4.11/1553 - Release Date: > >>>> > >>> 7/15/2008 5:48 AM > >>> > >>> > >>> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > >> --- > >> > >>> This automatic notification message was sent by Sakai Collab > >>> (https://collab.sakaiproject.org//portal > >>> <https://collab.sakaiproject.org/portal>) from the DG: User > >>> > >> Experience > >> > >>> site. > >>> You can modify how you receive notifications at My Workspace > > >>> Preferences. > >>> > >>> No virus found in this incoming message. > >>> Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com > >>> Version: 8.0.138 / Virus Database: 270.4.11/1553 - Release Date: > >>> > >> 7/15/2008 5:48 AM > >> > > > > > > No virus found in this incoming message. > > Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com > > Version: 8.0.138 / Virus Database: 270.4.11/1553 - Release Date: > 7/15/2008 5:48 AM > > > > > > > > > > > This automatic notification message was sent by Sakai Collab (https://collab.sakaiproject.org//portal > ) from the DG: Development (a.k.a. sakai-dev) site. > You can modify how you receive notifications at My Workspace > > Preferences. Daphne Ogle Senior Interaction Designer University of California, Berkeley Educational Technology Services daphne@... cell (510)847-0308 ---------------------- This automatic notification message was sent by Sakai Collab (https://collab.sakaiproject.org//portal) from the DG: Development (a.k.a. sakai-dev) site. You can modify how you receive notifications at My Workspace > Preferences. |
| Free embeddable forum powered by Nabble | Forum Help |
