« Return to Thread: Should default MSVC static library build use shared DLL runtime library instead of static?

Should default MSVC static library build use shared DLL runtime library instead of static?

by Timie Milie :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View in Thread


I guess it might just come down to a matter of preference but while I
don't want a DLL dependency on Crypto++ (so I use it as a static
library) I don't wan't to use the runtime as a static library (as this
can be found on most computers). If I am not unusual in the latter
preferrence is it worth changing this default setting in the MVC
project on subsequent releases (not doing so creates multiple (re)
defined runtime function errors should anyone by wondering)?

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the "Crypto++ Users" Google Group.
To unsubscribe, send an email to cryptopp-users-unsubscribe@....
More information about Crypto++ and this group is available at http://www.cryptopp.com.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

 « Return to Thread: Should default MSVC static library build use shared DLL runtime library instead of static?