|
View:
New views
9 Messages
—
Rating Filter:
Alert me
|
|
|
Skipping dependency report during Maven2 site generationSorry, this might be a re-post, but the first one did not go through
I need to understand how we disable the dependencies report during Maven2 site generation while leaving the other reports in place. We use reports such as the dependency convergence report, but the dependencies report just takes too long. The documentation does not seem to be clear on how to disable a default report such as this one. Thanks in advance |
|
|
Re: Skipping dependency report during Maven2 site generationsinplicity <carterdevlists@...> writes:
> Sorry, this might be a re-post, but the first one did not go through > > I need to understand how we disable the dependencies report during > Maven2 site generation while leaving the other reports in place. We > use reports such as the dependency convergence report, but the > dependencies report just takes too long. The documentation does not > seem to be clear on how to disable a default report such as this one. To make the dependency report generation LOTS faster, stick the following in the reporting/plugins section of your POM: <plugin> <groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId> <artifactId>maven-project-info-reports-plugin</artifactId> <configuration> <dependencyLocationsEnabled>false</dependencyLocationsEnabled> </configuration> </plugin> Alternatively, run Maven with -Ddependency.locations.enabled=false. -- Espen Wiborg <espen.wiborg@...> - Veritas vos liberabit I know you believe you understand what you think I said. But I am not sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant. -- Anon. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@... For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@... |
|
|
Re: Skipping dependency report during Maven2 site generationHello,
I've got the same problem with Maven 2.0.9. However, this option (dependencyLocationsEnabled) does exist since 2.1 only, right? :-{ Thanks Kuno
|
|
|
Re: Skipping dependency report during Maven2 site generationDo not confuse the Maven version number versus the Maven Project Info
Reports Plugin version number. The option exists since 2.1 of the Maven Project Info Reports Plugin, which is usable with Maven 2.0.9. Changing your plugin configuration to: >> <plugin> >> <groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId> >> <artifactId>maven-project-info-reports-plugin</artifactId> <version>2.1</version> >> <configuration> >> <dependencyLocationsEnabled>false</dependencyLocationsEnabled> >> </configuration> >> </plugin> Should solve your problem. Since Maven 2.0.9 the default plugins have a version specified in contrary to earlier Maven versions. There plugins were always resolved to the latest version, which can cause unstable builds. You can always specify the version of the different plugins yourself. Hth, Nick Stolwijk ~Java Developer~ Iprofs BV. Claus Sluterweg 125 2012 WS Haarlem www.iprofs.nl On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 3:21 PM, qnob <kuno.baeriswyl@...> wrote: > > Hello, > > I've got the same problem with Maven 2.0.9. However, this option > (dependencyLocationsEnabled) does exist since 2.1 only, right? :-{ > > Thanks > > Kuno > > > > > espen.wiborg wrote: >> >> sinplicity <carterdevlists@...> writes: >>> Sorry, this might be a re-post, but the first one did not go through >>> >>> I need to understand how we disable the dependencies report during >>> Maven2 site generation while leaving the other reports in place. We >>> use reports such as the dependency convergence report, but the >>> dependencies report just takes too long. The documentation does not >>> seem to be clear on how to disable a default report such as this one. >> >> To make the dependency report generation LOTS faster, stick the >> following in the reporting/plugins section of your POM: >> >> <plugin> >> <groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId> >> <artifactId>maven-project-info-reports-plugin</artifactId> >> <configuration> >> <dependencyLocationsEnabled>false</dependencyLocationsEnabled> >> </configuration> >> </plugin> >> >> Alternatively, run Maven with -Ddependency.locations.enabled=false. >> >> -- >> Espen Wiborg <espen.wiborg@...> - Veritas vos liberabit >> I know you believe you understand what you think I said. But I am not >> sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant. -- Anon. >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@... >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@... >> >> >> > > -- > View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Skipping-dependency-report-during-Maven2-site-generation-tp20116761p20540282.html > Sent from the Maven - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@... > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@... > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@... For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@... |
|
|
AW: Skipping dependency report during Maven2 site generationok thanks. Do I need to put this in the report or plugins section. I'm a bit confused about the difference.
Kuno -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: Nick Stolwijk [mailto:nick.stolwijk@...] Gesendet: Montag, 17. November 2008 15:30 An: Maven Users List Betreff: Re: Skipping dependency report during Maven2 site generation Do not confuse the Maven version number versus the Maven Project Info Reports Plugin version number. The option exists since 2.1 of the Maven Project Info Reports Plugin, which is usable with Maven 2.0.9. Changing your plugin configuration to: >> <plugin> >> <groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId> >> <artifactId>maven-project-info-reports-plugin</artifactId> <version>2.1</version> >> <configuration> >> <dependencyLocationsEnabled>false</dependencyLocationsEnabled> >> </configuration> >> </plugin> Should solve your problem. Since Maven 2.0.9 the default plugins have a version specified in contrary to earlier Maven versions. There plugins were always resolved to the latest version, which can cause unstable builds. You can always specify the version of the different plugins yourself. Hth, Nick Stolwijk ~Java Developer~ Iprofs BV. Claus Sluterweg 125 2012 WS Haarlem www.iprofs.nl On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 3:21 PM, qnob <kuno.baeriswyl@...> wrote: > > Hello, > > I've got the same problem with Maven 2.0.9. However, this option > (dependencyLocationsEnabled) does exist since 2.1 only, right? :-{ > > Thanks > > Kuno > > > > > espen.wiborg wrote: >> >> sinplicity <carterdevlists@...> writes: >>> Sorry, this might be a re-post, but the first one did not go through >>> >>> I need to understand how we disable the dependencies report during >>> Maven2 site generation while leaving the other reports in place. We >>> use reports such as the dependency convergence report, but the >>> dependencies report just takes too long. The documentation does not >>> seem to be clear on how to disable a default report such as this >>> one. >> >> To make the dependency report generation LOTS faster, stick the >> following in the reporting/plugins section of your POM: >> >> <plugin> >> <groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId> >> <artifactId>maven-project-info-reports-plugin</artifactId> >> <configuration> >> <dependencyLocationsEnabled>false</dependencyLocationsEnabled> >> </configuration> >> </plugin> >> >> Alternatively, run Maven with -Ddependency.locations.enabled=false. >> >> -- >> Espen Wiborg <espen.wiborg@...> - Veritas vos liberabit I know >> you believe you understand what you think I said. But I am not sure >> you realize that what you heard is not what I meant. -- Anon. >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@... >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@... >> >> >> > > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/Skipping-dependency-report-during-Maven2-site-generation-tp20116761p20540282.html > Sent from the Maven - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@... > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@... > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@... For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@... |
|
|
Re: Skipping dependency report during Maven2 site generationIf I recall correctly, you can specify the version of a plugin in the
PluginManagement, Plugins, or Reporting Section of the pom. If you want to see wether your change has any effect, use the Help plugin (mvn help:effective-pom) This will list the version of each plugin in use. Hth, Nick Stolwijk ~Java Developer~ Iprofs BV. Claus Sluterweg 125 2012 WS Haarlem www.iprofs.nl On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 3:34 PM, Baeriswyl Kuno - Extern (IT-BA-MV) <kuno.baeriswyl@...> wrote: > ok thanks. Do I need to put this in the report or plugins section. I'm a bit confused about the difference. > > Kuno > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Nick Stolwijk [mailto:nick.stolwijk@...] > Gesendet: Montag, 17. November 2008 15:30 > An: Maven Users List > Betreff: Re: Skipping dependency report during Maven2 site generation > > > Do not confuse the Maven version number versus the Maven Project Info Reports Plugin version number. The option exists since 2.1 of the Maven Project Info Reports Plugin, which is usable with Maven 2.0.9. > > Changing your plugin configuration to: > >>> <plugin> >>> <groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId> >>> <artifactId>maven-project-info-reports-plugin</artifactId> > <version>2.1</version> >>> <configuration> >>> <dependencyLocationsEnabled>false</dependencyLocationsEnabled> >>> </configuration> >>> </plugin> > > Should solve your problem. > > Since Maven 2.0.9 the default plugins have a version specified in contrary to earlier Maven versions. There plugins were always resolved to the latest version, which can cause unstable builds. You can always specify the version of the different plugins yourself. > > Hth, > > Nick Stolwijk > ~Java Developer~ > > Iprofs BV. > Claus Sluterweg 125 > 2012 WS Haarlem > www.iprofs.nl > > > > On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 3:21 PM, qnob <kuno.baeriswyl@...> wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> I've got the same problem with Maven 2.0.9. However, this option >> (dependencyLocationsEnabled) does exist since 2.1 only, right? :-{ >> >> Thanks >> >> Kuno >> >> >> >> >> espen.wiborg wrote: >>> >>> sinplicity <carterdevlists@...> writes: >>>> Sorry, this might be a re-post, but the first one did not go through >>>> >>>> I need to understand how we disable the dependencies report during >>>> Maven2 site generation while leaving the other reports in place. We >>>> use reports such as the dependency convergence report, but the >>>> dependencies report just takes too long. The documentation does not >>>> seem to be clear on how to disable a default report such as this >>>> one. >>> >>> To make the dependency report generation LOTS faster, stick the >>> following in the reporting/plugins section of your POM: >>> >>> <plugin> >>> <groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId> >>> <artifactId>maven-project-info-reports-plugin</artifactId> >>> <configuration> >>> <dependencyLocationsEnabled>false</dependencyLocationsEnabled> >>> </configuration> >>> </plugin> >>> >>> Alternatively, run Maven with -Ddependency.locations.enabled=false. >>> >>> -- >>> Espen Wiborg <espen.wiborg@...> - Veritas vos liberabit I know >>> you believe you understand what you think I said. But I am not sure >>> you realize that what you heard is not what I meant. -- Anon. >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@... >>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@... >>> >>> >>> >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://www.nabble.com/Skipping-dependency-report-during-Maven2-site-generation-tp20116761p20540282.html >> Sent from the Maven - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@... >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@... >> >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@... > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@... > > |
|
|
Re: Skipping dependency report during Maven2 site generationAFAIK,
You need to put the version in reporting if you are using it for the site lifecycle... if you are also using the plugin the the build lifecycle, add version to pluginManagement... reporting only uses the version specified in pluginManagement if you run the build lifecycle immediately prior to running the site lifecycle within the same invokation of maven... thus if you don't put the version in both places mvn clean && mvn install && mvn site will return a different result from mvn clean install site as the first will use the versions specified in <reporting> when generating the site, while the second will use the versions specified in <pluginManagement> when generating the site (but only if you've attached the reporting plugin to the build lifecycle) Confused yet? -Stephen 2008/11/17 Nick Stolwijk <nick.stolwijk@...> > If I recall correctly, you can specify the version of a plugin in the > PluginManagement, Plugins, or Reporting Section of the pom. If you > want to see wether your change has any effect, use the Help plugin > (mvn help:effective-pom) This will list the version of each plugin in > use. > > Hth, > > Nick Stolwijk > ~Java Developer~ > > Iprofs BV. > Claus Sluterweg 125 > 2012 WS Haarlem > www.iprofs.nl > > > > On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 3:34 PM, Baeriswyl Kuno - Extern (IT-BA-MV) > <kuno.baeriswyl@...> wrote: > > ok thanks. Do I need to put this in the report or plugins section. I'm a > bit confused about the difference. > > > > Kuno > > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > > Von: Nick Stolwijk [mailto:nick.stolwijk@...] > > Gesendet: Montag, 17. November 2008 15:30 > > An: Maven Users List > > Betreff: Re: Skipping dependency report during Maven2 site generation > > > > > > Do not confuse the Maven version number versus the Maven Project Info > Reports Plugin version number. The option exists since 2.1 of the Maven > Project Info Reports Plugin, which is usable with Maven 2.0.9. > > > > Changing your plugin configuration to: > > > >>> <plugin> > >>> <groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId> > >>> <artifactId>maven-project-info-reports-plugin</artifactId> > > <version>2.1</version> > >>> <configuration> > >>> <dependencyLocationsEnabled>false</dependencyLocationsEnabled> > >>> </configuration> > >>> </plugin> > > > > Should solve your problem. > > > > Since Maven 2.0.9 the default plugins have a version specified in > contrary to earlier Maven versions. There plugins were always resolved to > the latest version, which can cause unstable builds. You can always specify > the version of the different plugins yourself. > > > > Hth, > > > > Nick Stolwijk > > ~Java Developer~ > > > > Iprofs BV. > > Claus Sluterweg 125 > > 2012 WS Haarlem > > www.iprofs.nl > > > > > > > > On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 3:21 PM, qnob <kuno.baeriswyl@...> wrote: > >> > >> Hello, > >> > >> I've got the same problem with Maven 2.0.9. However, this option > >> (dependencyLocationsEnabled) does exist since 2.1 only, right? :-{ > >> > >> Thanks > >> > >> Kuno > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> espen.wiborg wrote: > >>> > >>> sinplicity <carterdevlists@...> writes: > >>>> Sorry, this might be a re-post, but the first one did not go through > >>>> > >>>> I need to understand how we disable the dependencies report during > >>>> Maven2 site generation while leaving the other reports in place. We > >>>> use reports such as the dependency convergence report, but the > >>>> dependencies report just takes too long. The documentation does not > >>>> seem to be clear on how to disable a default report such as this > >>>> one. > >>> > >>> To make the dependency report generation LOTS faster, stick the > >>> following in the reporting/plugins section of your POM: > >>> > >>> <plugin> > >>> <groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId> > >>> <artifactId>maven-project-info-reports-plugin</artifactId> > >>> <configuration> > >>> <dependencyLocationsEnabled>false</dependencyLocationsEnabled> > >>> </configuration> > >>> </plugin> > >>> > >>> Alternatively, run Maven with -Ddependency.locations.enabled=false. > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Espen Wiborg <espen.wiborg@...> - Veritas vos liberabit I know > >>> you believe you understand what you think I said. But I am not sure > >>> you realize that what you heard is not what I meant. -- Anon. > >>> > >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@... > >>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@... > >>> > >>> > >>> > >> > >> -- > >> View this message in context: > >> > http://www.nabble.com/Skipping-dependency-report-during-Maven2-site-generation-tp20116761p20540282.html > >> Sent from the Maven - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > >> > >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@... > >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@... > >> > >> > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@... > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@... > > > > > |
|
|
RE: Skipping dependency report during Maven2 site generationStephen Connolly wrote:
> AFAIK, > > You need to put the version in reporting if you are using it for the > site lifecycle... if you are also using the plugin the the build > lifecycle, add version to pluginManagement... > > reporting only uses the version specified in pluginManagement if you > run the build lifecycle immediately prior to running the site > lifecycle within the same invokation of maven... thus if you don't > put the version in both places > > mvn clean && mvn install && mvn site > > will return a different result from > > mvn clean install site > > as the first will use the versions specified in <reporting> when > generating the site, while the second will use the versions specified > in <pluginManagement> when generating the site (but only if you've > attached the reporting plugin to the build lifecycle) > > Confused yet? Well, this can be topped! Actually, if you specify (different) versions both in the pluginManagement and the reporting sections, you will also get different results with mvn clean && mvn install && mvn site and mvn clean install site First command will use the version sepcified in the reporting section, second will use the version specified in the pluginDependency (if - as Stephen already pointed out - the plugin is also used during the build lifecycle). Reason for this behaviour: 1/ The reporting section does not inherit the settings from the pluginManagement. 2/ Each plugin can be loaded once only. First usage wins. - Jörg --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@... For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@... |
|
|
AW: Skipping dependency report during Maven2 site generationok, please stop here. It's enough information for one day!
Thanks to you all and hope I'll never run into this version running issue. Kuno -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: Jörg Schaible [mailto:Joerg.Schaible@...] Gesendet: Montag, 17. November 2008 16:58 An: Maven Users List Betreff: RE: Skipping dependency report during Maven2 site generation Stephen Connolly wrote: > AFAIK, > > You need to put the version in reporting if you are using it for the > site lifecycle... if you are also using the plugin the the build > lifecycle, add version to pluginManagement... > > reporting only uses the version specified in pluginManagement if you > run the build lifecycle immediately prior to running the site > lifecycle within the same invokation of maven... thus if you don't put > the version in both places > > mvn clean && mvn install && mvn site > > will return a different result from > > mvn clean install site > > as the first will use the versions specified in <reporting> when > generating the site, while the second will use the versions specified > in <pluginManagement> when generating the site (but only if you've > attached the reporting plugin to the build lifecycle) > > Confused yet? Well, this can be topped! Actually, if you specify (different) versions both in the pluginManagement and the reporting sections, you will also get different results with mvn clean && mvn install && mvn site and mvn clean install site First command will use the version sepcified in the reporting section, second will use the version specified in the pluginDependency (if - as Stephen already pointed out - the plugin is also used during the build lifecycle). Reason for this behaviour: 1/ The reporting section does not inherit the settings from the pluginManagement. 2/ Each plugin can be loaded once only. First usage wins. - Jörg --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@... For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@... --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@... For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@... |
| Free embeddable forum powered by Nabble | Forum Help |