Solr 1.4.0 vs 1.4.1

[Jeff Newburn]

The distribution seems to have precompiled 1.4.0 files from Nov 6th but when
the project is build with ant dist it kicks out jars/wars with 1.4.1-dev.
Is this what we are expecting since there is no mention in the CHANGES.txt
file.
--
Jeff Newburn
Software Engineer, Zappos.com
jnewburn@... - 702-943-7562

[Simon Willnauer]

Afaik, there was a discussion about this recently (can't remember
where). Lucene and its sub projects used to set the version number in
build.xml to the release number but this has been changed to the
current dev version.

simon

On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 11:39 PM, Jeff Newburn <jnewburn@...> wrote:

> The distribution seems to have precompiled 1.4.0 files from Nov 6th but when
> the project is build with ant dist it kicks out jars/wars with 1.4.1-dev.
> Is this what we are expecting since there is no mention in the CHANGES.txt
> file.
> --
> Jeff Newburn
> Software Engineer, Zappos.com
> jnewburn@... - 702-943-7562
>
>

[Jeff Newburn]

So which would be appropriate?  My concern is that the 1.4.1 has a larger
file size so don't want to miss some 1.4 feature or bug fix that happened
between 11/6 and 11/10.
--
Jeff Newburn
Software Engineer, Zappos.com
jnewburn@... - 702-943-7562

> From: Simon Willnauer <simon.willnauer@...>
> Reply-To: <solr-dev@...>
> Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 00:14:44 +0100
> To: <solr-dev@...>
> Subject: Re: Solr 1.4.0 vs 1.4.1
>
> Afaik, there was a discussion about this recently (can't remember
> where). Lucene and its sub projects used to set the version number in
> build.xml to the release number but this has been changed to the
> current dev version.
>
> simon
>
> On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 11:39 PM, Jeff Newburn <jnewburn@...> wrote:
>> The distribution seems to have precompiled 1.4.0 files from Nov 6th but when
>> the project is build with ant dist it kicks out jars/wars with 1.4.1-dev.
>> Is this what we are expecting since there is no mention in the CHANGES.txt
>> file.
>> --
>> Jeff Newburn
>> Software Engineer, Zappos.com
>> jnewburn@... - 702-943-7562
>>
>>

[Erik Hatcher-4]

This is by design so that any non-official build isn't seen as "1.4.0"  
anywhere.

     Erik

On Nov 10, 2009, at 6:18 PM, Jeff Newburn <jnewburn@...> wrote:

> So which would be appropriate?  My concern is that the 1.4.1 has a  
> larger
> file size so don't want to miss some 1.4 feature or bug fix that  
> happened
> between 11/6 and 11/10.
> --
> Jeff Newburn
> Software Engineer, Zappos.com
> jnewburn@... - 702-943-7562
>
>
>> From: Simon Willnauer <simon.willnauer@...>
>> Reply-To: <solr-dev@...>
>> Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 00:14:44 +0100
>> To: <solr-dev@...>
>> Subject: Re: Solr 1.4.0 vs 1.4.1
>>
>> Afaik, there was a discussion about this recently (can't remember
>> where). Lucene and its sub projects used to set the version number in
>> build.xml to the release number but this has been changed to the
>> current dev version.
>>
>> simon
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 11:39 PM, Jeff Newburn  
>> <jnewburn@...> wrote:
>>> The distribution seems to have precompiled 1.4.0 files from Nov  
>>> 6th but when
>>> the project is build with ant dist it kicks out jars/wars with  
>>> 1.4.1-dev.
>>> Is this what we are expecting since there is no mention in the  
>>> CHANGES.txt
>>> file.
>>> --
>>> Jeff Newburn
>>> Software Engineer, Zappos.com
>>> jnewburn@... - 702-943-7562
>>>
>>>
>

[hossman]

: So which would be appropriate?  My concern is that the 1.4.1 has a larger
: file size so don't want to miss some 1.4 feature or bug fix that happened

I don't understand this question ... what do you mean by "1.4.1 has a
larger file size" ?

building 1.4.0 from the source in the official release should produce the
same jar as what is included in that release -- the only distinction is
the name of the artifacts produced if you don't set the version params on
the command line (i suppose if you build without specifying the version
the artifacts will be slightly bigger because they contain metadata that
includes the (longer) "-dev" version, and the names of the jars included
in the war will have that as well) but the code is still the same.


-Hoss

[Jeff Newburn]

That is fine we are using 1.4.0.  When I compiled the 1.4.1 was 2k extra in
size.
--
Jeff Newburn
Software Engineer, Zappos.com
jnewburn@... - 702-943-7562

> From: Chris Hostetter <hossman_lucene@...>
> Reply-To: <solr-dev@...>
> Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 12:47:34 -0800 (PST)
> To: <solr-dev@...>
> Subject: Re: Solr 1.4.0 vs 1.4.1
>
>
> : So which would be appropriate?  My concern is that the 1.4.1 has a larger
> : file size so don't want to miss some 1.4 feature or bug fix that happened
>
> I don't understand this question ... what do you mean by "1.4.1 has a
> larger file size" ?
>
> building 1.4.0 from the source in the official release should produce the
> same jar as what is included in that release -- the only distinction is
> the name of the artifacts produced if you don't set the version params on
> the command line (i suppose if you build without specifying the version
> the artifacts will be slightly bigger because they contain metadata that
> includes the (longer) "-dev" version, and the names of the jars included
> in the war will have that as well) but the code is still the same.
>
>
> -Hoss
>