Sorry - this is a test

[jfabiani]

test
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: Dabo-users@...
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/dabo-users
Searchable Archives: http://leafe.com/archives/search/dabo-users
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/200911021727.04189.jfabiani@...

[jfabiani]

On Monday 02 November 2009 05:27:04 pm John wrote:
> test

Ed I got this????

Johnf


_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: Dabo-users@...
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/dabo-users
Searchable Archives: http://leafe.com/archives/search/dabo-users
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/200911021732.20708.jfabiani@...

[Ed Leafe-2]

On Nov 2, 2009, at 7:32 PM, John wrote:

> Ed I got this????


        Looks like it:

Nov  2 20:32:35 marge postfix/smtp[27647]: 737D8B879F: to=<jfabiani@...
 >, relay=canit-scan1.directcon.net[206.170.184.31]:25, delay=1.7,  
delays=0.08/0.72/0.22/0.71, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (250 2.0.0  
nA31WQDX018293 Message accepted for delivery)

        Guess your ISP had a change of heart.  ;-)


-- Ed Leafe



_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: Dabo-users@...
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/dabo-users
Searchable Archives: http://leafe.com/archives/search/dabo-users
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/53EAD8E7-FC0A-458C-B56E-13B6EB80BEFB@...

[jfabiani]

On Monday 02 November 2009 05:38:28 pm Ed Leafe wrote:

> On Nov 2, 2009, at 7:32 PM, John wrote:
> > Ed I got this????
>
> Looks like it:
>
> Nov  2 20:32:35 marge postfix/smtp[27647]: 737D8B879F:
> to=<jfabiani@...
>
>  >, relay=canit-scan1.directcon.net[206.170.184.31]:25, delay=1.7,
>
> delays=0.08/0.72/0.22/0.71, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (250 2.0.0
> nA31WQDX018293 Message accepted for delivery)
>
> Guess your ISP had a change of heart.  ;-)
>
>
> -- Ed Leafe

I wonder if it's a DNS issue.  Maybe it took forever for the IP change to get
to my ISP?  No actually to my filter provider (something called canit).  I
think canit will bonce anything that it can't reverse lookup????

Johnf


_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: Dabo-users@...
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/dabo-users
Searchable Archives: http://leafe.com/archives/search/dabo-users
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/200911021745.28605.jfabiani@...

[Paul McNett]

John wrote:

> On Monday 02 November 2009 05:38:28 pm Ed Leafe wrote:
>> On Nov 2, 2009, at 7:32 PM, John wrote:
>>> Ed I got this????
>> Looks like it:
>>
>> Nov  2 20:32:35 marge postfix/smtp[27647]: 737D8B879F:
>> to=<jfabiani@...
>>
>>  >, relay=canit-scan1.directcon.net[206.170.184.31]:25, delay=1.7,
>>
>> delays=0.08/0.72/0.22/0.71, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (250 2.0.0
>> nA31WQDX018293 Message accepted for delivery)
>>
>> Guess your ISP had a change of heart.  ;-)
>>
>>
>> -- Ed Leafe
>
> I wonder if it's a DNS issue.  Maybe it took forever for the IP change to get
> to my ISP?  No actually to my filter provider (something called canit).  I
> think canit will bonce anything that it can't reverse lookup????

No, the ip address of the mail server is unfortunately listed on 3 blacklists:

http://dnsstuff.com/beta/?view=toolrun&toolName=SpamDatabaseLookup&target=67.23.35.254

(sorry if that link requires a login)

This is common: other people on the rackspace cloud have caused the entire netblock
to be blacklisted on some lists, causing grief for everyone. ISP's shouldn't reject
or drop mail simply for being on a blacklist, they should instead add it to the spam
score and reject only if the score reaches a certain threshold.

Your ISP probably whitelisted that ip address after you complained.

Paul
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: Dabo-users@...
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/dabo-users
Searchable Archives: http://leafe.com/archives/search/dabo-users
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/4AEFBD94.50308@...