Span_arpeggio patch

[Carl Sorensen-3]

Way back in January  (10 months ago!!!), Chris Snyder was working on a patch
for spanned arpeggios.

<http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnu.lilypond.devel/19682>

I was asked to shepherd this process, but I have apparently dropped the ball
on doing so.

As far as I can see, no patch was ever applied, although there is a patch in
the -devel threads.

<http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnu.lilypond.devel/19027/>


A regression test is available here:

<http://temp.mvpsoft.com/ly/arpeggios/>

As far as I can tell, this patch was never applied, nor had a final
resolution, probably in part due to my losing track of it.

What can I do to help close this issue?

Thanks,

Carl



_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@...
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

[Chris Snyder-5]

Carl Sorensen wrote:
 > Way back in January  (10 months ago!!!), Chris Snyder was working on
a patch
 > for spanned arpeggios.
 >
 > <http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnu.lilypond.devel/19682>
 >
 > I was asked to shepherd this process, but I have apparently dropped
 > the ball on doing so.

You didn't drop the ball - the patch I submitted was rejected as being
the wrong approach. I offered to do a second take on it, but never
finished (I got overwhelmed trying to wade through everything). I could
give it another shot - I'm more familiar with the LilyPond code now.

Chris Snyder
Adoro Music Publishing
1-616-828-4436 x800
http://www.adoromusicpub.com



_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@...
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

[Carl Sorensen-3]

On 11/10/09 2:57 PM, "Chris Snyder" <csnyder@...> wrote:

> Carl Sorensen wrote:
>> Way back in January  (10 months ago!!!), Chris Snyder was working on
> a patch
>> for spanned arpeggios.
>>
>> <http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnu.lilypond.devel/19682>
>>
>> I was asked to shepherd this process, but I have apparently dropped
>> the ball on doing so.
>
> You didn't drop the ball - the patch I submitted was rejected as being
> the wrong approach. I offered to do a second take on it, but never
> finished (I got overwhelmed trying to wade through everything). I could
> give it another shot - I'm more familiar with the LilyPond code now.

That would be great!

Let me know how I can help.

Thanks,

Carl



_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@...
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel