On Wed, 2 Sep 2009, Ric Hardacre wrote:
>
> Throughout the spec a phrase similar to the following is used (square
> brackets indicate link to simple event definition):
>
> "[fire a simple event] that bubbles called change at the element,"
>
>
> The english is hard to follow and I also suggest that "called" is replaced
> with "named" to remove some ambiguity about wether or not it is referring
> to "calling" a function:
>
> "fire a [bubbling simple event] named change at the element,"
I've changed 'called' to 'named' throughout.
> The definition of the simple event would not need changing to accomodate
> the above:
>
> "which does not bubble (unless otherwise stated)"
I haven't changed 'fire a simple event' to 'fire a bubbling simple event'
because there are so many axes that are affected, e.g. whether the event
is cancelable, what it's various attributes should be, etc.
--
Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
