Status of GIT migration

View: New views
6 Messages — Rating Filter:   Alert me  

Status of GIT migration

by Markus Zywitza :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message


Hi all

after I have been busy some time, I want to work on AR again. However,
I'm unsure whether to use SVN or GIT for working on the trunk. I've
found some GIT repos on github.com/mausch, but all of them are marked
as
SVN migration - do not fork!

OTOH, the TeamCity is still pointing to the SVN repos. But when I
commit changes there, will this delay the migration?

BTW, my favourite would be GIT, as I have to work offline most of the
time. So is there a rough timeline for finishing the migration to GIT?

-Markus

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group.
To post to this group, send email to castle-project-devel@...
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to castle-project-devel+unsubscribe@...
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---


Re: Status of GIT migration

by Jonathon Rossi :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

At the moment the subversion repository is the master, you'll need to commit to it at the moment.

AFAIK there was a big discussion about migrating but we never really decided without a doubt that we were going to migrate the projects.

On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 9:32 PM, Markus Zywitza <markus.zywitza@...> wrote:

Hi all

after I have been busy some time, I want to work on AR again. However,
I'm unsure whether to use SVN or GIT for working on the trunk. I've
found some GIT repos on github.com/mausch, but all of them are marked
as
SVN migration - do not fork!

OTOH, the TeamCity is still pointing to the SVN repos. But when I
commit changes there, will this delay the migration?

BTW, my favourite would be GIT, as I have to work offline most of the
time. So is there a rough timeline for finishing the migration to GIT?

-Markus





--
Jono

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group.
To post to this group, send email to castle-project-devel@...
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to castle-project-devel+unsubscribe@...
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---


Re: Status of GIT migration

by mausch :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message


It was actually voted in favor of the migration, and I'm working on
it. There are a few issues that I will try to outline when I get some
time (currently swamped with work).

Markus, committing to svn will not delay the migration. I can send you
my git-svn clone if you want. Or if you're only going to work on AR
you can just:

git svn clone -s http://svn.castleproject.org:8080/svn/castle/ActiveRecord/

that won't take long since it's a short history.

Cheers,
Mauricio

On Nov 5, 8:49 am, Jonathon Rossi <j...@...> wrote:

> At the moment the subversion repository is the master, you'll need to commit
> to it at the moment.
>
> AFAIK there was a big discussion about migrating but we never really decided
> without a doubt that we were going to migrate the projects.
>
> On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 9:32 PM, Markus Zywitza <markus.zywi...@...>wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > Hi all
>
> > after I have been busy some time, I want to work on AR again. However,
> > I'm unsure whether to use SVN or GIT for working on the trunk. I've
> > found some GIT repos on github.com/mausch, but all of them are marked
> > as
> > SVN migration - do not fork!
>
> > OTOH, the TeamCity is still pointing to the SVN repos. But when I
> > commit changes there, will this delay the migration?
>
> > BTW, my favourite would be GIT, as I have to work offline most of the
> > time. So is there a rough timeline for finishing the migration to GIT?
>
> > -Markus
>
> --
> Jono
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group.
To post to this group, send email to castle-project-devel@...
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to castle-project-devel+unsubscribe@...
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---


Re: Status of GIT migration

by Markus Zywitza :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message


git svn is a PITA. I was dcommitting the master branch and it also
committed a feature branch and then forked my local repo.

I think I rather use SVN until the migration is finished....

-Markus

2009/11/5 Mauricio Scheffer <mauricioscheffer@...>:

>
> It was actually voted in favor of the migration, and I'm working on
> it. There are a few issues that I will try to outline when I get some
> time (currently swamped with work).
>
> Markus, committing to svn will not delay the migration. I can send you
> my git-svn clone if you want. Or if you're only going to work on AR
> you can just:
>
> git svn clone -s http://svn.castleproject.org:8080/svn/castle/ActiveRecord/
>
> that won't take long since it's a short history.
>
> Cheers,
> Mauricio
>
> On Nov 5, 8:49 am, Jonathon Rossi <j...@...> wrote:
>> At the moment the subversion repository is the master, you'll need to commit
>> to it at the moment.
>>
>> AFAIK there was a big discussion about migrating but we never really decided
>> without a doubt that we were going to migrate the projects.
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 9:32 PM, Markus Zywitza <markus.zywi...@...>wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> > Hi all
>>
>> > after I have been busy some time, I want to work on AR again. However,
>> > I'm unsure whether to use SVN or GIT for working on the trunk. I've
>> > found some GIT repos on github.com/mausch, but all of them are marked
>> > as
>> > SVN migration - do not fork!
>>
>> > OTOH, the TeamCity is still pointing to the SVN repos. But when I
>> > commit changes there, will this delay the migration?
>>
>> > BTW, my favourite would be GIT, as I have to work offline most of the
>> > time. So is there a rough timeline for finishing the migration to GIT?
>>
>> > -Markus
>>
>> --
>> Jono
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group.
To post to this group, send email to castle-project-devel@...
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to castle-project-devel+unsubscribe@...
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---


RE: Status of GIT migration

by G. Richard Bellamy-2 :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message


Yes, I didn't get a chance to pipe up before...

My recommendation, when using a SVN -> GIT structure, is to always commit to
SVN. Anything else is just asking for trouble. Once we've fully migrated, it
becomes moot, but until then...

- rb

-----Original Message-----
From: castle-project-devel@...
[mailto:castle-project-devel@...] On Behalf Of Markus Zywitza
Sent: Thursday, November 05, 2009 9:13 AM
To: castle-project-devel@...
Subject: Re: Status of GIT migration


git svn is a PITA. I was dcommitting the master branch and it also
committed a feature branch and then forked my local repo.

I think I rather use SVN until the migration is finished....

-Markus




--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group.
To post to this group, send email to castle-project-devel@...
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to castle-project-devel+unsubscribe@...
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---


Re: Status of GIT migration

by Daniel Hölbling :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

Is there anything new to report from the migration front?

greetings Daniel

On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 6:18 PM, G. Richard Bellamy <rbellamy@...> wrote:

Yes, I didn't get a chance to pipe up before...

My recommendation, when using a SVN -> GIT structure, is to always commit to
SVN. Anything else is just asking for trouble. Once we've fully migrated, it
becomes moot, but until then...

- rb

-----Original Message-----
From: castle-project-devel@...
[mailto:castle-project-devel@...] On Behalf Of Markus Zywitza
Sent: Thursday, November 05, 2009 9:13 AM
To: castle-project-devel@...
Subject: Re: Status of GIT migration


git svn is a PITA. I was dcommitting the master branch and it also
committed a feature branch and then forked my local repo.

I think I rather use SVN until the migration is finished....

-Markus




--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group.
To post to this group, send email to castle-project-devel@...
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to castle-project-devel%2Bunsubscribe@...
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---


--

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group.
To post to this group, send email to castle-project-devel@....
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to castle-project-devel+unsubscribe@....
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.