On 4/20/07, Robert Kaye <
rob@...> wrote:
>
> On Apr 20, 2007, at 1:22 AM, Kuno Woudt wrote:
> > That just sounds to me like a refusal to deal with the real problem :)
>
> Actually, I think this is the correct way to deal with a social
> problem. Its not really a technical problem we're facing -- we're
> facing the "perceived problem" of destructive editors and thus its a
> social problem.
>
> > For me personaly, that wouldn't help much, in many cases i'm probably
> > subscribed to the artist anyway. (then again.. the subscription mails
> > could use a bit more data).
>
> I agree with this. If someone would be interested in taking on
> defining exactly what should be in the artist sub emails, I would
> love to hear it. This has been something I've been wanting to do for
> quite some time, but when I look at the problem I'm never quite
> certain what to do.
>
> We could use an IdeaChampion for this:
>
>
http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/TurningYourIdeasIntoRealityWhile I don't have any brilliant ideas ready at this second, I would
love to spend some time brainstorming ways to improve the edit
subscription emails as they are an important for me to watch how the
data is being changed and also to see when new albums are coming out.
:)
I have a busy school & work term ahead of me this summer, but I would
love to work with someone (or a group of people) to help improve these
emails. So consider this my self-nomination to be a Co-IdeaChampion
;)
-Aaron
_______________________________________________
MusicBrainz-users mailing list
MusicBrainz-users@...
http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-users
