Subversion and GIT

[Dormando]

Yo,

If you're quick on the draw, you might notice that we've stopped using
Subversion for development of the memcached branches. The download page
has also been updated:

http://danga.com/memcached/download.bml

... to reflect using Git. A bit.

I presently use git-svn with my stable repository and push changes to
the *stable tree only* back up to SVN for convenience of SVN users.

I'd like to poll the list; does anyone care strongly that we should
continue to push stable changes back to SVN?

Would it be reasonable for us to mark a cutoff date?

Should we really be setting up gitorious on code.sixapart.com and giving
people commits to central git repos again?

Thanks,
-Dormando

[Jehiah Czebotar]

On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 5:19 PM, dormando <dormando@...> wrote:
> I'd like to poll the list; does anyone care strongly that we should
> continue to push stable changes back to SVN?

i care about an svn repository; mostly a convenience thing though, and
i probably won't be heartbroken if i don't have it at some point in
time.

--
Jehiah

[Dormando]

Jehiah Czebotar wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 5:19 PM, dormando <dormando@...> wrote:
>> I'd like to poll the list; does anyone care strongly that we should
>> continue to push stable changes back to SVN?
>
> i care about an svn repository; mostly a convenience thing though, and
> i probably won't be heartbroken if i don't have it at some point in
> time.
>

Do you follow it with an svn checkout, or via trac?

[Dustin Sallings]

On Jun 28, 2008, at 15:58, Jehiah Czebotar wrote:

> i care about an svn repository; mostly a convenience thing though, and
> i probably won't be heartbroken if i don't have it at some point in
> time.


        What aspects of svn are important to you?

--
Dustin Sallings