|

»

Suggestion: support '&' in argument define

View: New views

3 Messages — Rating Filter: Alert me

	Suggestion: support '&' in argument define by 郭雪松 :: Rate this Message: Reply to Author \| View Threaded \| Show Only this Message Some parts of this message have been removed. Learn more about Nabble's security policy. Pike support ‘\|’ in argument define: void look(Char\|Room target); I suggest to support ‘&’: void look(HasName&HasDesc target); Because for ‘look’, anything has a name and description is acceptable. Current in pike, we must add a new class Lookable{inherit HasName; inherit HasDesc;}, that is only for ‘look’ and not general. Xuesong Guo
	Re: Suggestion: support '&' in argument define by Henrik Grubbström-2 :: Rate this Message: Reply to Author \| View Threaded \| Show Only this Message On Fri, 9 Oct 2009, Xuesong Guo wrote: > Pike support '\|' in argument define: > > void look(Char\|Room target); > > I suggest to support '&': > > void look(HasName&HasDesc target); > > Because for 'look', anything has a name and description is acceptable. This syntax suggestion has been on the todo-list for quite a while (the concept is actually fully supported by the low-level type-checker, and is available to be used by functions implemented in C). > Current in pike, we must add a new class Lookable{inherit HasName; inherit > HasDesc;}, that is only for 'look' and not general. > > Xuesong Guo -- Henrik Grubbström grubba@... Roxen Internet Software AB
	答复: Suggestion: support '&' in argument define by 郭雪松 :: Rate this Message: Reply to Author \| View Threaded \| Show Only this Message Great ! -----邮件原件----- 发件人: Henrik Grubbström [mailto:grubba@...] 发送时间: 2009年10月9日 17:42 收件人: Xuesong Guo 抄送: 'Pike mailinglist' 主题: Re: Suggestion: support '&' in argument define On Fri, 9 Oct 2009, Xuesong Guo wrote: > Pike support '\|' in argument define: > > void look(Char\|Room target); > > I suggest to support '&': > > void look(HasName&HasDesc target); > > Because for 'look', anything has a name and description is acceptable. This syntax suggestion has been on the todo-list for quite a while (the concept is actually fully supported by the low-level type-checker, and is available to be used by functions implemented in C). > Current in pike, we must add a new class Lookable{inherit HasName; inherit > HasDesc;}, that is only for 'look' and not general. > > Xuesong Guo -- Henrik Grubbström grubba@... Roxen Internet Software AB