In response to an administrative request to review issues, I thought
I would send this more publicly:
I see three TAG that I am listed as shepherd on:
ISSUE-63: Metadata Architecture
I think the first follow-up action is to get other TAG member's
review of the proposed framework.
A second follow-up would be to review current and past W3C and other
work on metadata and see how it fits (or doesn't fit) into the
framework.
Using that, we might start developing a metadata architecture
overview as an adjunct or update to AWWW? But we'd want to
review this.
ISSUE-27: " Should W3C specifications start promoting IRIs?"
I want to rename this issue as "How should W3C specifications
refer to IRIs" since I don't think the binary yes/no question
captures it. And the work to align W3C and IETF specs in this
area is in progress and should be the source of action items.
ISSUE-41: "designing extensible languages and for
handling versioning?"
I'd put Noah's overview of DE and the JAR and LMM (and Raman?)
work on versioning and payoffs as further actions.
Larry
--
http://larry.masinter.net
