Test Coverage on branch and trunk

[Deng Ching-2]

Hi All,

I'll be configuring code coverage on Continuum trunk and 1.3.x branch to
identify which classes still lack tests. I'm considering using either the
Cobertura plugin or the Emma plugin. There is a problem with Cobertura and
war:inplace goal though as we encountered in Archiva (
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MRM-636). I've only tried the Emma plugin
briefly once and the experience was pretty good so I'm kind of leaning
towards using it. Any suggestions or comments on this?

Thanks,
Deng

[brettporter]

+1 for EMMA, since it works in Eclipse and IDEA as well.

On 23/09/2009, at 4:03 PM, Deng Ching wrote:

> Hi All,
>
> I'll be configuring code coverage on Continuum trunk and 1.3.x  
> branch to
> identify which classes still lack tests. I'm considering using  
> either the
> Cobertura plugin or the Emma plugin. There is a problem with  
> Cobertura and
> war:inplace goal though as we encountered in Archiva (
> http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MRM-636). I've only tried the Emma  
> plugin
> briefly once and the experience was pretty good so I'm kind of leaning
> towards using it. Any suggestions or comments on this?
>
> Thanks,
> Deng

[Emmanuel Venisse-2]

+1 too

Emmanuel

On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 8:20 AM, Brett Porter <brett@...> wrote:

> +1 for EMMA, since it works in Eclipse and IDEA as well.
>
>
> On 23/09/2009, at 4:03 PM, Deng Ching wrote:
>
>  Hi All,
>>
>> I'll be configuring code coverage on Continuum trunk and 1.3.x branch to
>> identify which classes still lack tests. I'm considering using either the
>> Cobertura plugin or the Emma plugin. There is a problem with Cobertura and
>> war:inplace goal though as we encountered in Archiva (
>> http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MRM-636). I've only tried the Emma plugin
>> briefly once and the experience was pretty good so I'm kind of leaning
>> towards using it. Any suggestions or comments on this?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Deng
>>
>
>

[Deng Ching-2]

It turns out the Emma plugin is also having the same problem with
war:inplace as Cobertura. I looked at the source code of Emma and it has the
same default lifecycle where the classesDirectory is being set, which is
causing the same error 'Cannot override read-only parameter:
classesDirectory in goal: war:inplace'.

On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 5:27 PM, Emmanuel Venisse <
emmanuel.venisse@...> wrote:

> +1 too
>
> Emmanuel
>
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 8:20 AM, Brett Porter <brett@...> wrote:
>
> > +1 for EMMA, since it works in Eclipse and IDEA as well.
> >
> >
> > On 23/09/2009, at 4:03 PM, Deng Ching wrote:
> >
> >  Hi All,
> >>
> >> I'll be configuring code coverage on Continuum trunk and 1.3.x branch to
> >> identify which classes still lack tests. I'm considering using either
> the
> >> Cobertura plugin or the Emma plugin. There is a problem with Cobertura
> and
> >> war:inplace goal though as we encountered in Archiva (
> >> http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MRM-636). I've only tried the Emma
> plugin
> >> briefly once and the experience was pretty good so I'm kind of leaning
> >> towards using it. Any suggestions or comments on this?
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Deng
> >>
> >
> >
>

[brettporter]

I think the use of war:inplace should be removed. It's a nasty hack to  
make jetty:run work with war overlays. I was planning to look at the  
Jetty plugin as I think they have an option to add additional source  
directories now that would mean this and all the obscure clean plugin  
config could go...

- Brett

On 24/09/2009, at 7:07 PM, Deng Ching wrote:

> It turns out the Emma plugin is also having the same problem with
> war:inplace as Cobertura. I looked at the source code of Emma and it  
> has the
> same default lifecycle where the classesDirectory is being set,  
> which is
> causing the same error 'Cannot override read-only parameter:
> classesDirectory in goal: war:inplace'.
>
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 5:27 PM, Emmanuel Venisse <
> emmanuel.venisse@...> wrote:
>
>> +1 too
>>
>> Emmanuel
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 8:20 AM, Brett Porter <brett@...>  
>> wrote:
>>
>>> +1 for EMMA, since it works in Eclipse and IDEA as well.
>>>
>>>
>>> On 23/09/2009, at 4:03 PM, Deng Ching wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi All,
>>>>
>>>> I'll be configuring code coverage on Continuum trunk and 1.3.x  
>>>> branch to
>>>> identify which classes still lack tests. I'm considering using  
>>>> either
>> the
>>>> Cobertura plugin or the Emma plugin. There is a problem with  
>>>> Cobertura
>> and
>>>> war:inplace goal though as we encountered in Archiva (
>>>> http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MRM-636). I've only tried the Emma
>> plugin
>>>> briefly once and the experience was pretty good so I'm kind of  
>>>> leaning
>>>> towards using it. Any suggestions or comments on this?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Deng
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>