The terrorists have won

View: New views
2 Messages — Rating Filter:   Alert me  
< Prev | 1 - 2 | Next >

Re: The terrorists have won

by Ken Arromdee :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

On Wed, 8 Jul 2009, George Herbert wrote:
> A news blackout, to me, seems much less ambiguous and much less giving
> in than paying ransom.  We do not impose legal or social penalties
> against families or companies that pay ransoms.

Well, some are trying:
http://af.reuters.com/article/libyaNews/idAFL451214120090704


_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@...
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l

Re: The terrorists have won

by stevertigo-2 :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 11:24 AM, Ken Arromdee<arromdee@...> wrote:
> On Tue, 7 Jul 2009, stevertigo wrote:
>> > It's not just the Times' fault for not having the journalistic integrity...
>> Well to be fair, the concept of saving the human life is compelling...

Meta note:
Please be careful to give accurate attribution to posted comments. The
above makes it look like I said "It's not just the Times' fault..."
when my comment begins at "Well to be fair..."  The problem is
bi-dualistic: 1) whoever did write something isn't credited/faulted,
and 2) whoever didn't write something is credited/faulted.

Regards,
Steven

_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@...
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
< Prev | 1 - 2 | Next >