Thorn Rev. 10476 compile error
|
View:
New views
15 Messages
—
Rating Filter:
Alert me
|
 |
Thorn Rev. 10476 compile error
by Julie S
::
Rate this Message:
Hello everyone, Getting this during compile of thorn: src/gui/rulers/ControlRuler.cpp:92: error: invalid use of incomplete type ‘struct Rosegarden::ControlToolBox’ src/gui/rulers/ControlRuler.h:50: error: forward declaration of ‘struct Rosegarden::ControlToolBox’ src/gui/rulers/ControlRuler.cpp: In member function ‘virtual void Rosegarden::ControlRuler::mouseMoveEvent(QMouseEvent*)’: src/gui/rulers/ControlRuler.cpp:461: error: aggregate ‘Rosegarden::ControlMouseEvent controlMouseEvent’ has incomplete type and cannot be defined make: *** [src/gui/rulers/ControlRuler.o] Error 1 This might have to do with CJfryer current commits. Too busy to look into this myself, but wanted to report it. Sincerely, Julie S. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge This is your chance to win up to $100,000 in prizes! For a limited time, vendors submitting new applications to BlackBerry App World(TM) will have the opportunity to enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge. See full prize details at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/Challenge _______________________________________________ Rosegarden-devel mailing list Rosegarden-devel@... - use the link below to unsubscribe https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel |
|
|
Re: Thorn Rev. 10476 compile error
by D. Michael McIntyre-3
::
Rate this Message:
On Wednesday 08 July 2009, Julie S wrote:
> src/gui/rulers/ControlRuler.cpp:92: error: invalid use of incomplete type > ‘struct Rosegarden::ControlToolBox’ src/gui/rulers/ControlRuler.h:50: It seems our resident Code Jaguar has officially botched his first commit! Way to go Chris! src/gui/rulers/PropertyControlRuler.cpp:27:28: error: ControlToolBox.h: No such file or directory I sure hate it when this happens. Everyone has done it at one point or another, myself definitely included, but there has to be a way to fix this once and for all. While I wait for Chris to commit the missing files, I think I'll chew on that for awhile. -- D. Michael McIntyre ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge This is your chance to win up to $100,000 in prizes! For a limited time, vendors submitting new applications to BlackBerry App World(TM) will have the opportunity to enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge. See full prize details at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/Challenge _______________________________________________ Rosegarden-devel mailing list Rosegarden-devel@... - use the link below to unsubscribe https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Thorn Rev. 10476 compile error
by D. Michael McIntyre-3
::
Rate this Message:
On Wednesday 08 July 2009, Julie S wrote:
> I just noticed in the main view, the record lights were dimly lit red on > tracks without connections. I think you did that as well. I like that > too. I wonder if you happen to have an .rg file that when loaded will display what you're talking about, and if not, maybe a screenshot? I want to be sure of how the new code is behaving in the field, because "dimly lit red" doesn't actually sound like anything I intended. The record LEDs should be red, orange or yellow for tracks associated with audio, synth or plain MIDI instruments, respectively. White LEDs indicate a broken instrument, and green means "oh shit." We should never see green. If I go delete "General MIDI Device" then all the tracks attached to that get white LEDs. What happens there? > I see that there was a "show" velocity, pitch, and an add ruler, but, I > didn't see a way to turn them off. There will be. > Hmm.. maybe a toggle state (show / > hide) for velocity, and for the others (pitch and any others that are > added). But, I think we where still discussing all the issues surrounding > the interface and scope of access for these (segment / versus global). Can anyone think of a compelling advantage to having rulers attached to anything other than the global scope? At the moment there's no memory backend to any of this anyway, but it seems easiest just to do it globally. I kind of started in that direction without really contemplating why it seemed the most reasonable thing to do, but now that I think about it, it still does. For my purposes anyway, that would probably be fine. -- D. Michael McIntyre ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge This is your chance to win up to $100,000 in prizes! For a limited time, vendors submitting new applications to BlackBerry App World(TM) will have the opportunity to enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge. See full prize details at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/Challenge _______________________________________________ Rosegarden-devel mailing list Rosegarden-devel@... - use the link below to unsubscribe https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel |
|
|
Re: Thorn Rev. 10476 compile error
by Emanuel Rumpf-3
::
Rate this Message:
2009/7/9 D. Michael McIntyre <rosegarden.trumpeter@...>:
> On Wednesday 08 July 2009, Julie S wrote: > >> Hmm.. maybe a toggle state (show / >> hide) for velocity, and for the others (pitch and any others that are >> added). But, I think we where still discussing all the issues surrounding >> the interface and scope of access for these (segment / versus global). > > Can anyone think of a compelling advantage to having rulers attached to > anything other than the global scope? When having multiple (possibly overlapping) segments/windows opened - will global rulers be able to show differing values for each ? ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge This is your chance to win up to $100,000 in prizes! For a limited time, vendors submitting new applications to BlackBerry App World(TM) will have the opportunity to enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge. See full prize details at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/Challenge _______________________________________________ Rosegarden-devel mailing list Rosegarden-devel@... - use the link below to unsubscribe https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel |
|
|
Re: Thorn Rev. 10476 compile error
by D. Michael McIntyre-3
::
Rate this Message:
On Thursday 09 July 2009, Emanuel Rumpf wrote:
> > Can anyone think of a compelling advantage to having rulers attached to > > anything other than the global scope? > > When having multiple (possibly overlapping) segments/windows opened - > will global rulers be able to show differing values for each ? I'm just talking about the setting for whether a particular ruler is visible or not, and nothing deeper than that. It used to be stored in the segment, I think. Open a velocity ruler against a particular segment in a matrix view, and then open another matrix view, and a notation view. They all show the ruler. We could still do it that way, but I wonder if it's actually all that useful. Do I want something like this to follow my segment around from editor to editor? I don't really think so, no. So the other side of it is if I open a velocity, a pitch bend, a pan and a modulation ruler in a matrix view, do I really want the next matrix view (possibly of some completely different segment) to come up with those same rulers until I turn them back off? I don't really think so, no. I think for myself as a user, if these were quick to turn on and off, I would probably be content to create a ruler on the spot as needed, and let it evaporate when I was finished with that particular view window. Anyway, there is a lot of other stuff we can do before we really have to settle this question, so since there's nothing being held up waiting on a decision, this is a good opportunity to just spend some time thinking about how it should work. -- D. Michael McIntyre ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge This is your chance to win up to $100,000 in prizes! For a limited time, vendors submitting new applications to BlackBerry App World(TM) will have the opportunity to enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge. See full prize details at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/Challenge _______________________________________________ Rosegarden-devel mailing list Rosegarden-devel@... - use the link below to unsubscribe https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel |
|
|
Re: Thorn Rev. 10476 compile error
by Chris Fryer
::
Rate this Message:
>> It seems our resident Code Jaguar has officially botched
>> his first commit! >> >> Way to go Chris! > > Welcome to the club CJ! > Well spotted you guys. Just keeping you on your toes! No, seriously, it turns out svn has rejected my commit as spam, something to do with the file name containing "Tool" and "Bo***x" ... it's a bug, apparently they're going to fix it this afternoon in time for my attempt to get it right this evening. CJ (Code Jellyfish) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge This is your chance to win up to $100,000 in prizes! For a limited time, vendors submitting new applications to BlackBerry App World(TM) will have the opportunity to enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge. See full prize details at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/Challenge _______________________________________________ Rosegarden-devel mailing list Rosegarden-devel@... - use the link below to unsubscribe https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Thorn Rev. 10476 compile error
by D. Michael McIntyre-3
::
Rate this Message:
On Thursday 09 July 2009, Julie S wrote:
> just sent them to the trumpeter... private email address. Got it. Too drunk to respond at the moment. At 3:00 in the afternoon no less. Shameful. But when you're painting a bathroom, what else are you going to drink? Water? I may have to ignore you and everyone else until tomorrow at this rate. -- D. Michael McIntyre ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge This is your chance to win up to $100,000 in prizes! For a limited time, vendors submitting new applications to BlackBerry App World(TM) will have the opportunity to enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge. See full prize details at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/Challenge _______________________________________________ Rosegarden-devel mailing list Rosegarden-devel@... - use the link below to unsubscribe https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel |
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Thorn Rev. 10476 compile error
by D. Michael McIntyre-3
::
Rate this Message:
On Thursday 09 July 2009, Julie S wrote:
> Well, as long as the beer doesn't affect the bathroom painting, it is all > good. Hey, who says I wasn't drinking cabernet sauvignon '49? :) Miller High Life actually. $3 for a six pack, and not in cans. Hard to beat when you're broke, but I do miss my fancy brau. Drinking swill out of bottles instead of cans is as close as I get to fancy brau these days. Bathroom looks good. Everything is a little crooked and off, and that's because there are tons of old '70s beer cans hidden everywhere in this place. The builders were drunk too. -- D. Michael McIntyre ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge This is your chance to win up to $100,000 in prizes! For a limited time, vendors submitting new applications to BlackBerry App World(TM) will have the opportunity to enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge. See full prize details at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/Challenge _______________________________________________ Rosegarden-devel mailing list Rosegarden-devel@... - use the link below to unsubscribe https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel |
|
|
|
| Free embeddable forum powered by Nabble | Forum Help |
