|
View:
New views
8 Messages
—
Rating Filter:
Alert me
|
|
|
Time off by -5 hoursHello,
We have several servers set up with a hybrid between this: http://fte.tegtmeyer.net/djbware/clockspeed_setup.html and the very similar information at thedjbway.org, which seems to be offline right now. All our servers except two have the correct time; the two that are not correct are both off by -5 hours. I am guessing (but have no proof) that they lost synch during the DST time change last Sunday. I am tempted to just restart all the clockspeed stuff and see if it catches the right time (we configured the above system to get it from NTP), but I'm afraid that that will mask the problem, so I am hoping someone might have some pointers of where this might be caused before I just try to reset the time. Oh, and the timezone on the machines appears correct. Help? __________________________________ Yahoo! FareChase: Search multiple travel sites in one click. http://farechase.yahoo.com |
|
|
Re: Time off by -5 hours> We have several servers set up with a hybrid between this: > > http://fte.tegtmeyer.net/djbware/clockspeed_setup.html > > and the very similar information at thedjbway.org, which seems to be > offline right now. > > All our servers except two have the correct time; the two that are not > correct are both off by -5 hours. I am guessing (but have no proof) that > they lost synch during the DST time change last Sunday. > > I am tempted to just restart all the clockspeed stuff and see if it > catches > the right time (we configured the above system to get it from NTP), but I'm > afraid that that will mask the problem, so I am hoping someone might have > some pointers of where this might be caused before I just try to reset the > time. > > Oh, and the timezone on the machines appears correct. Looking at the log files, the NTP server we chose to use in our config file apparently has changed or is otherwise not available these days: sntpclock: warning: unable to read clock: timed out sntpclock: warning: unable to read clock: timed out sntpclock: fatal: time uncertainty too large clockadd: fatal: data split across packets However, all our servers are getting this error; why would only two of them have lost five hours? Thanks __________________________________ Yahoo! FareChase: Search multiple travel sites in one click. http://farechase.yahoo.com |
|
|
Re: Time off by -5 hours> > We have several servers set up with a hybrid between this: > > > > http://fte.tegtmeyer.net/djbware/clockspeed_setup.html > > > > and the very similar information at thedjbway.org, which seems to be > > offline right now. > > > > All our servers except two have the correct time; the two that are not > > correct are both off by -5 hours. I am guessing (but have no proof) that > > they lost synch during the DST time change last Sunday. > > > > I am tempted to just restart all the clockspeed stuff and see if it > > catches > > the right time (we configured the above system to get it from NTP), but > I'm > > afraid that that will mask the problem, so I am hoping someone might have > > some pointers of where this might be caused before I just try to reset > the > > time. > > > > Oh, and the timezone on the machines appears correct. > > Looking at the log files, the NTP server we chose to use in our config file > apparently has changed or is otherwise not available these days: > > sntpclock: warning: unable to read clock: timed out > sntpclock: warning: unable to read clock: timed out > sntpclock: fatal: time uncertainty too large > clockadd: fatal: data split across packets > > However, all our servers are getting this error; why would only two of them > have lost five hours? Still not found an answer to the five hour loss, but what was interesting was that when I updated our "clockctl" config file with an active NTP server (anyone have an enhanced version of this approach that allows for using a list of NTP servers so we can have some fallback?), the machine said that it had the correct time all along. As shown by the date command run just prior, that was not the case. Why/how would this happen? Here is the actual series of events: # date Thu Nov 3 17:15:59 PST 2005 # /etc/clockspeed/clockctl sync Setting system clock with master server at www.xxx.yyy.zzz: before: 2005-11-03 22:17:28.182072000000000000 after: 2005-11-03 22:17:28.182235999833472072 # date Thu Nov 3 22:17:41 PST 2005 That is rather odd, is it not? __________________________________ Yahoo! FareChase: Search multiple travel sites in one click. http://farechase.yahoo.com |
|
|
Re: Time off by -5 hours(CC: Frank Tegtmeyer and Wayne Marshall, see below)
> > > We have several servers set up with a hybrid between this: > > > > > > http://fte.tegtmeyer.net/djbware/clockspeed_setup.html > > > > > > and the very similar information at thedjbway.org, which seems to be > > > offline right now. > > > > > > All our servers except two have the correct time; the two that are > not > > > correct are both off by -5 hours. I am guessing (but have no proof) > that > > > they lost synch during the DST time change last Sunday. > > > > > > I am tempted to just restart all the clockspeed stuff and see if it > > > catches > > > the right time (we configured the above system to get it from NTP), but > > I'm > > > afraid that that will mask the problem, so I am hoping someone might > have > > > some pointers of where this might be caused before I just try to reset > > the > > > time. > > > > > > Oh, and the timezone on the machines appears correct. > > > > Looking at the log files, the NTP server we chose to use in our config > file > > apparently has changed or is otherwise not available these days: > > > > sntpclock: warning: unable to read clock: timed out > > sntpclock: warning: unable to read clock: timed out > > sntpclock: fatal: time uncertainty too large > > clockadd: fatal: data split across packets > > > > However, all our servers are getting this error; why would only two of > them > > have lost five hours? > > Still not found an answer to the five hour loss, but what was interesting > was > that when I updated our "clockctl" config file with an active NTP server > (anyone have an enhanced version of this approach that allows for using a > list of NTP servers so we can have some fallback?), A little bit of an aside, but we just hacked up a solution to this paranthetical. Our config file for this setup now looks like this: CLOCK_IPS[0]="999.888.777.666" CLOCK_IPS[1]=`dnsip abc.def.edu | sed 's/ .*//'` CLOCK_IPS[2]=`dnsip example.com | sed 's/ .*//'` CLOCK_IPS[3]="666.777.888.999" We use DNS to resolve the ones that state to use DNS according to their listing with ntp.isc.org and just IPs for all others. And our "clockctl" will now start looking for a responsive NTP server starting at a random point in the array of NTP servers and only try to update time with a given server if it is currently responding to NTP requests. We added this function (and we call it, of course, before we process anything else in this script): # choose which CLOCK_IP to use # choose_clock_ip() { echo "Looking for an active master server..." # start in random place in array MAX=${#CLOCK_IPS[@]} START=$RANDOM let "START %= $MAX" # gives random number less than $MAX J="$START" CLOCK_IP=0 while test 1; do echo "Trying ${CLOCK_IPS[$J]}..." ${CLOCKSPEED_BIN}/sntpclock "${CLOCK_IPS[$J]}" > /dev/null if [ $? = 0 ]; then CLOCK_IP="${CLOCK_IPS[$J]}" echo "Will use ${CLOCK_IPS[$J]}" break fi # loop control... J=`expr $J + 1` if [ $J = $START ]; then break elif [ $J = $MAX -a $START = 0 ]; then break elif [ $J = $MAX ]; then J=0 fi done if [ $CLOCK_IP = 0 ] ; then echo "$0: server error: no master servers were reachable" exit 1; fi } Still looking for the five hour mystery, however...... > the machine said that > it > had the correct time all along. As shown by the date command run just > prior, > that was not the case. Why/how would this happen? Here is the actual > series > of events: > > # date > Thu Nov 3 17:15:59 PST 2005 > # /etc/clockspeed/clockctl sync > Setting system clock with master server at www.xxx.yyy.zzz: > before: 2005-11-03 22:17:28.182072000000000000 > after: 2005-11-03 22:17:28.182235999833472072 > # date > Thu Nov 3 22:17:41 PST 2005 > > That is rather odd, is it not? __________________________________ Yahoo! FareChase: Search multiple travel sites in one click. http://farechase.yahoo.com |
|
|
Re: Time off by -5 hoursemail builder writes:
> Still looking for the five hour mystery, however...... Is 5 hours your local TZ offset from UTC either before or after the daylight savings transition? Regards, Ben |
|
|
Re: Time off by -5 hours> email builder writes: > > Still looking for the five hour mystery, however...... > > Is 5 hours your local TZ offset from UTC either before or after the > daylight savings transition? Sorry, I should have mentioned that. No, it is not. We are in California, which is currently GMT-8, or before the change GMT-7. I am really not sure where the five hour thing comes from and why two of our servers both did the same thing. Thanks __________________________________ Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005 http://mail.yahoo.com |
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Time off by -5 hours> >
> > I just came across the OpenBSD setup of ntp - they use pool.ntp.org as > > source. This gives a random set of 8 IP addresses of Stratum2 servers. > ... > >Still not found an answer to the five hour loss, but what was interesting was >that when I updated our "clockctl" config file with an active NTP server >(anyone have an enhanced version of this approach that allows for using a >list of NTP servers so we can have some fallback?), Hi I've used sometime ago netselect , this give you the fastest server from a list ex.: netselect -s1 `dnsip pool.ntp.org` | awk '{print $2}' http://www.worldvisions.ca/~apenwarr/netselect/ Florin |
| Free embeddable forum powered by Nabble | Forum Help |