Time to release FULMAR: what should be in it?

View: New views
6 Messages — Rating Filter:   Alert me  

Time to release FULMAR: what should be in it?

by Matthew Peters-3 :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message


It has been over two months since our last release and it is time we
did another one. We have been a bit quiet recently, though, and have
only three fixes in FULMAR at the moment.

See http://groups.google.com/group/phpsoa/web/contents-of-release-from-fulmar-branch

What else should we be fixing as a priority before releasing FULMAR?

Matthew



--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "phpsoa" group.
To post to this group, send email to phpsoa@...
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to phpsoa-unsubscribe@...
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.co.uk/group/phpsoa?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---


Re: Time to release FULMAR: what should be in it?

by Tom-237 :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message


> What else should we be fixing as a priority before releasing FULMAR?

Line 24 SCA_BindingFactory.php:
if (!class_exists('SCA_Binding_Factory',)) {

should be:
if (!class_exists('SCA_Binding_Factory', false)) {
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "phpsoa" group.
To post to this group, send email to phpsoa@...
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to phpsoa-unsubscribe@...
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.co.uk/group/phpsoa?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---


Re: Time to release FULMAR: what should be in it?

by Simon Laws :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message




On 22 Nov, 09:04, Tom <msc...@...> wrote:
> > What else should we be fixing as a priority before releasing FULMAR?
>
> Line 24 SCA_BindingFactory.php:
> if (!class_exists('SCA_Binding_Factory',)) {
>
> should be:
> if (!class_exists('SCA_Binding_Factory', false)) {

I see over on the Tuscany list that Pete is looking into applying the
patch to allow "-" to appear in SDO property names. Would be good to
get that in assuming that it's done in time.

Simon
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "phpsoa" group.
To post to this group, send email to phpsoa@...
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to phpsoa-unsubscribe@...
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.co.uk/group/phpsoa?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---


Re: Time to release FULMAR: what should be in it?

by monxton :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message


Tom wrote:
>> What else should we be fixing as a priority before releasing FULMAR?
>
> Line 24 SCA_BindingFactory.php:
> if (!class_exists('SCA_Binding_Factory',)) {
>
> should be:
> if (!class_exists('SCA_Binding_Factory', false)) {

I can imagine what happened :-)

Actually that's quite a common pattern in the SCA code, and presumably
each of its occurrences should be fixed in the same way.


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "phpsoa" group.
To post to this group, send email to phpsoa@...
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to phpsoa-unsubscribe@...
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.co.uk/group/phpsoa?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---


Re: Time to release FULMAR: what should be in it?

by Matthew Peters-3 :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message


Tom, thanks for spotting that. I fixed it and also at Caroline's
suggestion I looked at the other places and fixed a few others. We
always want to put false on because never want to load a class
inadvertently.

Matthew

On Nov 22, 1:19 pm, Caroline Maynard <c...@...> wrote:

> Tom wrote:
> >> What else should we be fixing as a priority before releasing FULMAR?
>
> > Line 24 SCA_BindingFactory.php:
> > if (!class_exists('SCA_Binding_Factory',)) {
>
> > should be:
> > if (!class_exists('SCA_Binding_Factory', false)) {
>
> I can imagine what happened :-)
>
> Actually that's quite a common pattern in the SCA code, and presumably
> each of its occurrences should be fixed in the same way.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "phpsoa" group.
To post to this group, send email to phpsoa@...
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to phpsoa-unsubscribe@...
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.co.uk/group/phpsoa?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---


Re: Time to release FULMAR: what should be in it?

by Matthew Peters-3 :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message


Looking through the open defects I think we should fix the following
two soon. We have let them go quiet.

http://pecl.php.net/bugs/bug.php?id=12193 - binding.soap: alphabetical
order of namespaces causes failure
http://pecl.php.net/bugs/bug.php?id=11996 - SCA does not show libxml2
parse errors

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "phpsoa" group.
To post to this group, send email to phpsoa@...
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to phpsoa-unsubscribe@...
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.co.uk/group/phpsoa?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---