|
View:
New views
3 Messages
—
Rating Filter:
Alert me
|
|
|
Titanium install failing on OS X 10.5.8Perl 5.8.8 / OS X 10.5.8
Titanium install is hanging on test 3/11 when installing Test::WWW::Mechanize t/put_ok.t .............. 2/11 I have to say my first impression of Titanium is that it is heading in the direction of Catalyst regarding the number of dependencies and is in danger of losing sight of being a lightweight, easily installed alternative to the monolith that is Catalyst. Just my 2 cents. gvim ##### CGI::Application community mailing list ################ ## ## ## To unsubscribe, or change your message delivery options, ## ## visit: http://www.erlbaum.net/mailman/listinfo/cgiapp ## ## ## ## Web archive: http://www.erlbaum.net/pipermail/cgiapp/ ## ## Wiki: http://cgiapp.erlbaum.net/ ## ## ## ################################################################ |
|
|
looking for concepts: code reuseDear all!
Lately, I encounter quite a lot of applications where I have to pic one of many records to do something with it. E.g. there is a user manager, that displays a list of all users, and a button that leads to a function, such as edit or delete user. This list of users is is shown somewhere else, e.g. in the billing part of the software, where I have to pick a user out of a list, for which I have to record his entries. The common part is, that there is a list displayed, that contains all users, and that has some specific buttons. ATM, I recode the same thing over and over again (fetching the list of users, filling a template), mainly because there are different templates to be used. Now, there is this prerequisite that I put all stuff of a part of an application in its own namespace, according to a tutorial fom the CA website. I like that idea, as I can reuse big parts of functionality in other applications with only a small effort. So isn't there a better way? A more general / generic way? Should such thing be coded as a more generic plugin? Is there a good reason not to change it? Or is it useful to recode the same functionality for each part of the application to reduce complexity and allow a higher level of customization? I'm not sure about this. For now, I just will keep on recoding another user selection for another functionality. If any questions, feel free to ask. It's possible, that the information above is too spare. Regards, Alex ##### CGI::Application community mailing list ################ ## ## ## To unsubscribe, or change your message delivery options, ## ## visit: http://www.erlbaum.net/mailman/listinfo/cgiapp ## ## ## ## Web archive: http://www.erlbaum.net/pipermail/cgiapp/ ## ## Wiki: http://cgiapp.erlbaum.net/ ## ## ## ################################################################ |
|
|
Re: Titanium install failing on OS X 10.5.8On Tue, 15 Sep 2009, gvim wrote:
> Perl 5.8.8 / OS X 10.5.8 > > Titanium install is hanging on test 3/11 when installing Test::WWW::Mechanize > > t/put_ok.t .............. 2/11 > What version is your WWW::Mechanize? It needs to be atleast 1.21_01 to support put and it looks like you have an older one. -- Jaldhar H. Vyas <jaldhar@...> ##### CGI::Application community mailing list ################ ## ## ## To unsubscribe, or change your message delivery options, ## ## visit: http://www.erlbaum.net/mailman/listinfo/cgiapp ## ## ## ## Web archive: http://www.erlbaum.net/pipermail/cgiapp/ ## ## Wiki: http://cgiapp.erlbaum.net/ ## ## ## ################################################################ |
| Free embeddable forum powered by Nabble | Forum Help |