On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 8:53 PM, David Mandelin <
dmandelin@...> wrote:
> Taras says JS development has been regularly busting Treehydra lately. A
> recent example would be
>
>
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=526299>
> Taras suggested adding Treehydra's unit tests to our regular JS testing.
> What do JS devs think of that? Currently, it would require building
> Treehydra (including building a patched gcc) and then running 'make check'
> in Treehydra.
I think we need something that doesn't involve building a patched gcc
if people are going to do it. A tinderbox that runs those tests
against tracemonkey is probably the best bang for the buck.
(They could also incrementally add JS or JSAPI tests for bugs we
introduce on them that aren't caught by our JS suite, or the existing
browser/platform test coverage.)
Mike
_______________________________________________
dev-tech-js-engine mailing list
dev-tech-js-engine@...
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-js-engine