|

»

Typo in the PAPE spec?

View: New views

5 Messages — Rating Filter: Alert me

	Typo in the PAPE spec? by Allen Tom-2 :: Rate this Message: Reply to Author \| View Threaded \| Show Only this Message Hi All, In Section 5.1 of the PAPE Spec, there's a request parameter defined called openid.pape.preferred_auth_level_types however the example in the same section calls it openid.pape.preferred_auth_levels Which one is it? Thanks _______________________________________________ specs mailing list specs@... http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/specs
	Re: Typo in the PAPE spec? by Andrew Arnott :: Rate this Message: Reply to Author \| View Threaded \| Show Only this Message If running code is the authority, DotNetOpenAuth uses preferred_auth_level_types. -- Andrew Arnott "I [may] not agree with what you have to say, but I'll defend to the death your right to say it." - S. G. Tallentyre On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 10:03 AM, Allen Tom <atom@...> wrote: Hi All, In Section 5.1 of the PAPE Spec, there's a request parameter defined called openid.pape.preferred_auth_level_types however the example in the same section calls it openid.pape.preferred_auth_levels Which one is it? Thanks _______________________________________________ specs mailing list specs@... http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/specs _______________________________________________ specs mailing list specs@... http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/specs
	Re: Typo in the PAPE spec? by Jonathan Daugherty-2 :: Rate this Message: Reply to Author \| View Threaded \| Show Only this Message # If running code is the authority, DotNetOpenAuth uses # preferred_auth_level_types. The openidenabled.com Python implementation of draft 5 uses that, also. -- Jonathan Daugherty _______________________________________________ specs mailing list specs@... http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/specs
	Re: [specs-pape] Typo in the PAPE spec? by Paul Madsen :: Rate this Message: Reply to Author \| View Threaded \| Show Only this Message are examples normative? If not, is an errata necessary? Are there any plans for another PAPE version? paul John Bradley wrote: > The normative text is correct. > > It was always openid.pape.preferred_auth_level_types form Oct 2008 > when it was added to draft 5. > The bad example crept in in Draft 6 and went unnoticed. > > We will need to figure out a process for errata. > > Thanks for picking it up. > > John B. > On 17-Jun-09, at 1:03 PM, Allen Tom wrote: > >> Hi All, >> >> In Section 5.1 of the PAPE Spec, there's a request parameter defined >> called >> openid.pape.preferred_auth_level_types >> >> however the example in the same section calls it >> >> openid.pape.preferred_auth_levels >> >> Which one is it? >> >> >> Thanks >> _______________________________________________ >> specs-pape mailing list >> specs-pape@... >> http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/specs-pape > > _______________________________________________ > specs-pape mailing list > specs-pape@... > http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/specs-pape > _______________________________________________ specs mailing list specs@... http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/specs
	Re: [specs-pape] Typo in the PAPE spec? by Nat Sakimura :: Rate this Message: Reply to Author \| View Threaded \| Show Only this Message Examples are not normative, but errata in the sense of "a slip in the book" is nice none the less. There is no official move on the PAPE front right now, but may be in a near future. =nat@Tokyo via iPhone On 2009/06/19, at 23:07, Paul Madsen <paulmadsen@...> wrote: > are examples normative? If not, is an errata necessary? > > Are there any plans for another PAPE version? > > paul > > John Bradley wrote: >> The normative text is correct. >> >> It was always openid.pape.preferred_auth_level_types form Oct 2008 >> when it was added to draft 5. >> The bad example crept in in Draft 6 and went unnoticed. >> >> We will need to figure out a process for errata. >> >> Thanks for picking it up. >> >> John B. >> On 17-Jun-09, at 1:03 PM, Allen Tom wrote: >> >>> Hi All, >>> >>> In Section 5.1 of the PAPE Spec, there's a request parameter >>> defined called >>> openid.pape.preferred_auth_level_types >>> >>> however the example in the same section calls it >>> >>> openid.pape.preferred_auth_levels >>> >>> Which one is it? >>> >>> >>> Thanks >>> _______________________________________________ >>> specs-pape mailing list >>> specs-pape@... >>> http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/specs-pape >> >> _______________________________________________ >> specs-pape mailing list >> specs-pape@... >> http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/specs-pape >> > _______________________________________________ > specs-pape mailing list > specs-pape@... > http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/specs-pape _______________________________________________ specs mailing list specs@... http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/specs