|
View:
New views
7 Messages
—
Rating Filter:
Alert me
|
|
|
Re: Update from ParisHi All, Will there be an official communiqué concerning the things that
were discussed at this conference? Some of the GLAM institutes that I am
working with would doubtlessly be interested in what’s planned for the future
where Commons is concerned. Cheers, Craig F. From:
commons-l-bounces@...
[mailto:commons-l-bounces@...] On Behalf Of Gerard
Meijssen Hoi.
It was a great meeting.. There were a few critical issues as
far as I am concerned:
Thanks, _______________________________________________ Commons-l mailing list Commons-l@... https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l |
|
|
Update from ParisHoi.
The French chapter did a wonderful job organising some of the brightest lights that deal with Commons in one place. Many subjects were discussed and some things were achieved. The two (technical) things that stand out on the achieving part..
GerardM _______________________________________________ Commons-l mailing list Commons-l@... https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l |
|
|
Re: Update from ParisI hadn't seen that, that's nice. Results seem to be incomplete, though, is it working only on a subset of the servers? I am much interested in that point and the subjects related to this planned modification of the workflow, where can we find more information about that? What's GLAM again? What do you mean? Any specific details available anywhere? Thanks again Eusebius _______________________________________________ Commons-l mailing list Commons-l@... https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l |
|
|
Re: Update from ParisGLAM - Galleries, Libraries, Archives, Museums
2009/11/9 Eusebius <wikipedia@...>
-- GN. http://gnangarra.redbubble.com/ _______________________________________________ Commons-l mailing list Commons-l@... https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l |
|
|
Re: Update from ParisOn Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 10:02 AM, Eusebius <wikipedia@...> wrote:
> Hi Gerard, thanks for your report, > >> there is now global usage for images from within MediaWiki itself.. so no >> need for using the toolserver... The process of gathering all the necessary >> data may now have ended.. > > I hadn't seen that, that's nice. Results seem to be incomplete, though, is > it working only on a subset of the servers? > Currently only data is available for pages that have been edited since the extension was enabled. We are currently dealing with some technical problems which happened in the process of populating data from other pages, and I hope that we will soon have a complete data set. Bryan _______________________________________________ Commons-l mailing list Commons-l@... https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l |
|
|
Re: Update from ParisHoi,
There is some documentation from the sessions on the Usability Wiki. They are notes taken at the sessions. They reflect what was said but not necessarily gives a good impression on the thinking behind it. What we agreed on in Paris is that some administrators effectively prevent new users learning how to become Wikimedians. Some say they are a self selecting group of assholes that (may) mean well... By introducing technology that makes it easy to be friendly, we hope that many admins prove not to be assholes. Particularly for Commons there is a need to help people out. Commons is a multi lingual project and it is not easy at all to understand or appreciate the wall of information that is expected to be understood the first time around when you speak English. People who do not speak English do not stand a chance and, this has to be made easier. Thanks, GerardM 2009/11/9 Eusebius <wikipedia@...>
_______________________________________________ Commons-l mailing list Commons-l@... https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l |
|
|
Re: Update from ParisHoi,
The conference in Paris was a Commons conference and while important, the GLAM part was only part of what we did. It was a "working conference" very much intended to prepare for the Ford foundation project to improve the usability of Commons. As you may appreciate, my mail was intended to inform that we have been talking and, to indicate in what direction the thinking was going. There is no intention to write an official communique and if at all it will not have anything firm in there except for "we consider working with GLAM very important". When you work with GLAMs you may also know that there is a mailing list on the subject. At that we came to the conclusion that we do not necessarily know who is doing what in this field ... Thanks, GerardM 2009/11/8 Craig Franklin <craig@...>
_______________________________________________ Commons-l mailing list Commons-l@... https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l |
| Free embeddable forum powered by Nabble | Forum Help |