Update to tinymce?

View: New views
7 Messages — Rating Filter:   Alert me  

Update to tinymce?

by Michael Sharman :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message


Hi guys,

I believe the version of tinymce that comes with "core" is a little
out of date, is there a plugin or plan in the works to upgrade to the
latest version?

If not, do you believe it will be a big task to do the integration and
what are you thoughts on simply updating core as opposed to creating a
plugin?

Thanks
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message cos you are subscribed to "farcry-dev" Google group.
To post, email: farcry-dev@...
To unsubscribe, email: farcry-dev+unsubscribe@...
For more options: http://groups.google.com/group/farcry-dev
--------------------------------
Follow us on Twitter: http://twitter.com/farcry
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---


Re: Update to tinymce?

by modius :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message


On Jun 24, 3:07 pm, Michael Sharman <sha...@...> wrote:
> I believe the version of tinymce that comes with "core" is a little
> out of date, is there a plugin or plan in the works to upgrade to the
> latest version?
>
> If not, do you believe it will be a big task to do the integration and
> what are you thoughts on simply updating core as opposed to creating a
> plugin?

The real time sink with the tinyMCE upgrade is the need to write a new
tinyMCE plugin for integrating FarCry content (ie. the FarCry
button).  The latest version of tinyMCE is a pretty much a rewrite and
introduces a new plugin architecture.

I expect its not likely to be all that difficult, it's just a block of
time we don't have at the moment.  Of course if there was a sponsor
out there, or someone wanted to contribute a solution we'd be happy to
consider it for core.

If you wanted to attempt an update, your best bet would be to build a
plugin, and get it to completely replace the richtext.cfc formtool.
Once you have that working we can look to integrate the solution
directly into core within an appropriate milestone.

Regards,

-- geoff
http://www.daemon.com.au/
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message cos you are subscribed to "farcry-dev" Google group.
To post, email: farcry-dev@...
To unsubscribe, email: farcry-dev+unsubscribe@...
For more options: http://groups.google.com/group/farcry-dev
--------------------------------
Follow us on Twitter: http://twitter.com/farcry
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---


Re: Update to tinymce?

by Marco van den Oever :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message


I am wondering in case of sponsoring, how does it work, can we be a
little more transparent about prices etc? Or email about this? If
that's more in the open i can see what i could share, and we all know
how many others we could motivate so we all could contribute a part.

Not only for this situation but it might open up possibilities for
other future features that we would love to see integrated that are
not on the 'open source path' or could be faster implemented if funded
for.

Is this something we could setup in the bug tracker as feature
improvement and put all the info out there, price, time, requests,
people joining in, is that an idea?

On Jun 24, 8:42 am, modius <mod...@...> wrote:

> On Jun 24, 3:07 pm, Michael Sharman <sha...@...> wrote:
>
> > I believe the version of tinymce that comes with "core" is a little
> > out of date, is there a plugin or plan in the works to upgrade to the
> > latest version?
>
> > If not, do you believe it will be a big task to do the integration and
> > what are you thoughts on simply updating core as opposed to creating a
> > plugin?
>
> The real time sink with the tinyMCE upgrade is the need to write a new
> tinyMCE plugin for integrating FarCry content (ie. the FarCry
> button).  The latest version of tinyMCE is a pretty much a rewrite and
> introduces a new plugin architecture.
>
> I expect its not likely to be all that difficult, it's just a block of
> time we don't have at the moment.  Of course if there was a sponsor
> out there, or someone wanted to contribute a solution we'd be happy to
> consider it for core.
>
> If you wanted to attempt an update, your best bet would be to build a
> plugin, and get it to completely replace the richtext.cfc formtool.
> Once you have that working we can look to integrate the solution
> directly into core within an appropriate milestone.
>
> Regards,
>
> -- geoffhttp://www.daemon.com.au/
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message cos you are subscribed to "farcry-dev" Google group.
To post, email: farcry-dev@...
To unsubscribe, email: farcry-dev+unsubscribe@...
For more options: http://groups.google.com/group/farcry-dev
--------------------------------
Follow us on Twitter: http://twitter.com/farcry
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---


Re: Update to tinymce?

by admin-256 :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message


Good idea Marco.
Tunç

-----Original Message-----
From: farcry-dev@... [mailto:farcry-dev@...] On
Behalf Of Marco van den Oever
Sent: 24 June 2009 16:11
To: farcry-dev
Subject: [farcry-dev] Re: Update to tinymce?


I am wondering in case of sponsoring, how does it work, can we be a
little more transparent about prices etc? Or email about this? If
that's more in the open i can see what i could share, and we all know
how many others we could motivate so we all could contribute a part.

Not only for this situation but it might open up possibilities for
other future features that we would love to see integrated that are
not on the 'open source path' or could be faster implemented if funded
for.

Is this something we could setup in the bug tracker as feature
improvement and put all the info out there, price, time, requests,
people joining in, is that an idea?

On Jun 24, 8:42 am, modius <mod...@...> wrote:

> On Jun 24, 3:07 pm, Michael Sharman <sha...@...> wrote:
>
> > I believe the version of tinymce that comes with "core" is a little
> > out of date, is there a plugin or plan in the works to upgrade to the
> > latest version?
>
> > If not, do you believe it will be a big task to do the integration and
> > what are you thoughts on simply updating core as opposed to creating a
> > plugin?
>
> The real time sink with the tinyMCE upgrade is the need to write a new
> tinyMCE plugin for integrating FarCry content (ie. the FarCry
> button).  The latest version of tinyMCE is a pretty much a rewrite and
> introduces a new plugin architecture.
>
> I expect its not likely to be all that difficult, it's just a block of
> time we don't have at the moment.  Of course if there was a sponsor
> out there, or someone wanted to contribute a solution we'd be happy to
> consider it for core.
>
> If you wanted to attempt an update, your best bet would be to build a
> plugin, and get it to completely replace the richtext.cfc formtool.
> Once you have that working we can look to integrate the solution
> directly into core within an appropriate milestone.
>
> Regards,
>
> -- geoffhttp://www.daemon.com.au/





--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message cos you are subscribed to "farcry-dev" Google group.
To post, email: farcry-dev@...
To unsubscribe, email: farcry-dev+unsubscribe@...
For more options: http://groups.google.com/group/farcry-dev
--------------------------------
Follow us on Twitter: http://twitter.com/farcry
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---


Re: Update to tinymce?

by Marco van den Oever :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message


It is? You know, if 100 or maybe just 10 of the 674 users here would
agree... Anyone else enthusiastic about this?

On Jun 24, 5:32 pm, <ad...@...> wrote:

> Good idea Marco.
> Tunç
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: farcry-dev@... [mailto:farcry-dev@...] On
>
> Behalf Of Marco van den Oever
> Sent: 24 June 2009 16:11
> To: farcry-dev
> Subject: [farcry-dev] Re: Update to tinymce?
>
> I am wondering in case of sponsoring, how does it work, can we be a
> little more transparent about prices etc? Or email about this? If
> that's more in the open i can see what i could share, and we all know
> how many others we could motivate so we all could contribute a part.
>
> Not only for this situation but it might open up possibilities for
> other future features that we would love to see integrated that are
> not on the 'open source path' or could be faster implemented if funded
> for.
>
> Is this something we could setup in the bug tracker as feature
> improvement and put all the info out there, price, time, requests,
> people joining in, is that an idea?
>
> On Jun 24, 8:42 am, modius <mod...@...> wrote:
> > On Jun 24, 3:07 pm, Michael Sharman <sha...@...> wrote:
>
> > > I believe the version of tinymce that comes with "core" is a little
> > > out of date, is there a plugin or plan in the works to upgrade to the
> > > latest version?
>
> > > If not, do you believe it will be a big task to do the integration and
> > > what are you thoughts on simply updating core as opposed to creating a
> > > plugin?
>
> > The real time sink with the tinyMCE upgrade is the need to write a new
> > tinyMCE plugin for integrating FarCry content (ie. the FarCry
> > button).  The latest version of tinyMCE is a pretty much a rewrite and
> > introduces a new plugin architecture.
>
> > I expect its not likely to be all that difficult, it's just a block of
> > time we don't have at the moment.  Of course if there was a sponsor
> > out there, or someone wanted to contribute a solution we'd be happy to
> > consider it for core.
>
> > If you wanted to attempt an update, your best bet would be to build a
> > plugin, and get it to completely replace the richtext.cfc formtool.
> > Once you have that working we can look to integrate the solution
> > directly into core within an appropriate milestone.
>
> > Regards,
>
> > -- geoffhttp://www.daemon.com.au/
>
>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message cos you are subscribed to "farcry-dev" Google group.
To post, email: farcry-dev@...
To unsubscribe, email: farcry-dev+unsubscribe@...
For more options: http://groups.google.com/group/farcry-dev
--------------------------------
Follow us on Twitter: http://twitter.com/farcry
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---


Re: Update to tinymce?

by modius :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message


On Jun 25, 1:11 am, Marco van den Oever <marcovandenoe...@...>
wrote:
> I am wondering in case of sponsoring, how does it work, can we be a
> little more transparent about prices etc? Or email about this? If
> that's more in the open i can see what i could share, and we all know
> how many others we could motivate so we all could contribute a part.

Our policy on sponsorship of code is outlined here:
  http://www.daemon.com.au/services/farcry-core-changes

We've also been looking at introducing some sort of bounty program,
eg. defining a feature, setting up a fund that people can contribute
to, and building the feature once the nominated bounty is met.  It
would be interesting to know how keen community members would be to
participate in such a scheme.

At this time nearly all development is sponsored directly by Daemon
and some of its larger clients.

-- geoff
http://www.daemon.com.au/

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message cos you are subscribed to "farcry-dev" Google group.
To post, email: farcry-dev@...
To unsubscribe, email: farcry-dev+unsubscribe@...
For more options: http://groups.google.com/group/farcry-dev
--------------------------------
Follow us on Twitter: http://twitter.com/farcry
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---


Re: Update to tinymce?

by Marco van den Oever :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message


That's indeed very interesting, i hope there will be some feedback
from members i am definitively enthusiastic about it. Thanks.

On Jun 26, 3:24 am, modius <mod...@...> wrote:

> On Jun 25, 1:11 am, Marco van den Oever <marcovandenoe...@...>
> wrote:
>
> > I am wondering in case of sponsoring, how does it work, can we be a
> > little more transparent about prices etc? Or email about this? If
> > that's more in the open i can see what i could share, and we all know
> > how many others we could motivate so we all could contribute a part.
>
> Our policy on sponsorship of code is outlined here:
>  http://www.daemon.com.au/services/farcry-core-changes
>
> We've also been looking at introducing some sort of bounty program,
> eg. defining a feature, setting up a fund that people can contribute
> to, and building the feature once the nominated bounty is met.  It
> would be interesting to know how keen community members would be to
> participate in such a scheme.
>
> At this time nearly all development is sponsored directly by Daemon
> and some of its larger clients.
>
> -- geoffhttp://www.daemon.com.au/
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message cos you are subscribed to "farcry-dev" Google group.
To post, email: farcry-dev@...
To unsubscribe, email: farcry-dev+unsubscribe@...
For more options: http://groups.google.com/group/farcry-dev
--------------------------------
Follow us on Twitter: http://twitter.com/farcry
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---