Hi Sarah,
It should be possible to use Derby the way you describe (in-memory,
faulted-in from disk). Right now you need to use backup and restore to
snapshot and re-instantiate an in-memory database. Making this easier to
do is on our list of possible enhancements for the next feature release,
10.6.
Hope this helps,
-Rick
sarah.kho wrote:
> Hi
> Thank you for reading my post.
> I am looking to use Derby database as the data repository for my application
> which Runs on CD. (ReadOnly). The application has 5 tables and all data are
> stored into the database during the software development.
>
> I am wondering whether it is possible to use Derby as ReadOnly and in-memory
> database to ensure the fastest possible running time.
>
> Thanks.
>
>
>