|
View:
New views
2 Messages
—
Rating Filter:
Alert me
|
|
|
Using property expansion and sets in criteriaHi, Consider a question to a server like: "Which VCRs have the activity x in the activity-set of their checked-in version?" Two things would be necessary for this. First, where the "prop" element is expected, a nested prop element should be allowed as well; something reminiscent of the expand property report. Second, there should an "in" operator for all those properties which are in fact sets. Here is a possible example of the above question: <d:searchrequest xmlns:d="DAV:"> <d:basicsearch> <d:select> <d:prop><d:displayname/></d:prop> </d:select> <d:from> <d:scope> <d:href>http://hostname/container1/</d:href> <d:depth>infinity</d:depth> </d:scope> </d:from> <d:where> <d:in> <d:property name="checked-in"> <d:property name="activity-set"/> </d:property> <d:literal>http://hostname/act/my_activity</d:literal> </d:in> </d:where> </d:basicsearch> </d:searchrequest> Regards, Werner. -- Werner Donné -- Re Engelbeekstraat 8 B-3300 Tienen tel: (+32) 486 425803 e-mail: werner.donne@... |
|
|
Re: Using property expansion and sets in criteriaWerner Donné schrieb: > > Hi, > > Consider a question to a server like: "Which VCRs have the > activity x in the activity-set of their checked-in version?" > Two things would be necessary for this. First, where the > "prop" element is expected, a nested prop element should be > allowed as well; something reminiscent of the expand property > report. Second, there should an "in" operator for all those > properties which are in fact sets. > > Here is a possible example of the above question: > > <d:searchrequest xmlns:d="DAV:"> > <d:basicsearch> > <d:select> > <d:prop><d:displayname/></d:prop> > </d:select> > <d:from> > <d:scope> > <d:href>http://hostname/container1/</d:href> > <d:depth>infinity</d:depth> > </d:scope> > </d:from> > <d:where> > <d:in> <d:property name="checked-in"> > <d:property name="activity-set"/> > </d:property> > <d:literal>http://hostname/act/my_activity</d:literal> > </d:in> > </d:where> > </d:basicsearch> > </d:searchrequest> > > Regards, > > Werner. It is a well-known restriction of the basicsearch grammar that it is simple. This is by design. When it was created, the assumption was that at a later point it would be replaced by something that is more XML aware, such as something XPath-based or even XQuery. That being said, the functionality you're looking for can of course be implemented as an optional extension to basicsearch (that's why there is grammar discovery, see <http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-reschke-webdav-search-09.html#rfc.section.4>). The right next step would be to write a self-contained proposal, and try to get at least one additional implementor behind it (otherwise it would make little sense to standardize it). Best regards, Julian |
| Free embeddable forum powered by Nabble | Forum Help |