Version inconsistency?

[Henk van de kamer-2]

Hello,

According to this webpage:

http://apr.apache.org/download.cgi

version 1.3.8 of APR is the latest available. However the last week or
so on the same page there was a version 1.3.9 which is still available
on different mirrors. So which one is correct?

--

Henk van de Kamer
http://www.vandekamer.com/


P.S.
Al mijn e-mail is digitaal ondertekend om mij zo te beschermen tegen
identiteitsdiefstal. Mocht uw mailprogramma hier niet goed mee overweg
kunnen, lees dan mijn uitleg [1]. Sorry voor de overlast, maar in de
toekomst zal u waarschijnlijk ook uw e-mail willen beschermen...

[1] http://www.hetlab.tk/artikelen/digitale-handtekening

[Bojan Smojver]

On Mon, 2009-10-12 at 09:21 +0200, Henk van de Kamer wrote:
> So which one is correct?

Something's not right there. The latest is 1.3.9. You can grab it form
main distribution directory, a bit further down on the same page.

--
Bojan

[Graham Leggett]

Henk van de Kamer wrote:

> According to this webpage:
>
> http://apr.apache.org/download.cgi
>
> version 1.3.8 of APR is the latest available. However the last week or
> so on the same page there was a version 1.3.9 which is still available
> on different mirrors. So which one is correct?

I've passed this to infra, as the version of that page you see is not
the latest version of the page in svn.

Thank you for pointing this out.

Regards,
Graham
--

[Paul Querna-6]

On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 10:24 AM, Graham Leggett <minfrin@...> wrote:

> Henk van de Kamer wrote:
>
>> According to this webpage:
>>
>> http://apr.apache.org/download.cgi
>>
>> version 1.3.8 of APR is the latest available. However the last week or
>> so on the same page there was a version 1.3.9 which is still available
>> on different mirrors. So which one is correct?
>
> I've passed this to infra, as the version of that page you see is not
> the latest version of the page in svn.
>
> Thank you for pointing this out.

fixed, it was due to a problem with svn:externals values changing.
looking at a long term solution.... but not sure if there is a good
one.