WARNING: This server is unstable and will be retired in the next days. If you want to keep this forum available, please request immediately a migration on the Nabble Support forum. Forums that don't receive any migration request will be deleted forever.

|

»

Versioning, dependencies, nuget and build server

View: New views

3 Messages — Rating Filter: Alert me

	Versioning, dependencies, nuget and build server by Krzysztof Kozmic-2 :: Rate this Message: \| View Threaded \| Show Only this Message Hi all, I'm slowly getting the projects after migration cleaned up. Core project should be now all in good shape. As I plan to make a release as soon as I clean this all up (and integrate one outstanding feature), I have some questions that need to be answered - Which of those projects we want to re-release and which versions they should have? As a reminder, we now have in addition to what used to be there: [in square brackets last released version] (in normal brackets suggested version for the new release) - Castle.Components.Binder [none] (3.0 / not release?) - Castle.Components.Pagination [1.1.1] (3.0 / not release?) - Castle.Components.Validator [2.5] (3.0 / not release?) Core and logging services is a no-brainer, I'm not sure how to proceed with the other ones. Also since Pagination is just a few types really, perhaps we should make it a source-only release? Windsor This one I just started and it's more complicated. We have the following new additions: - Castle.Facilities.ActiveRecordIntegration [1.1.2RC] (3.0) - Castle.Facilities.NHibernateIntegration [none] (3.0) The problem with those is dependency on ActiveRecord and NHibernate. Which versions of those dependencies do we want to have? I'm pretty convinced NHibernate Facility should be built on top of NHibernate 3.2. Not too sure about ActiveRecord Facility. The last release was against AR 3.0RC and NHibernate 3.1 Do we want to stick to those versions? What is final AR going to be released against? NH 3.1 or 3.2? Also what is the planned release schedule for AR and who is maintaining it these days? AR Facility also has a dependency on Transaction Services. Henrik, what are your plans for release against Core 3.0? Due to this dependency release of this facility will need to be coordinated between Core, Windsor, Active Record and Transactions. I can already feel the pain in my ass. Nuget To alleviate some of the pain in maintaining all of this, I would like to start using Nuget to manage our external depdendencies (NHibernate, log4net, nlog etc). Any objections/suggestions relating that? +1 ? -1 ? Build Server The build server has recently tendency to go offline for multiple hours at a time to do 'database cleanup'. This is extremely annoying. Henry/Hammett can one of you guys have a look at what we can do to make it stop/take significantly less time? cheers, Krzysztof -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group. To post to this group, send email to castle-project-devel@.... To unsubscribe from this group, send email to castle-project-devel+unsubscribe@.... For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.
	Re: Versioning, dependencies, nuget and build server by Krzysztof Kozmic-2 :: Rate this Message: \| View Threaded \| Show Only this Message Hi guys, I hope everyone had (is still having) an awesome weekend. Please don't forget to throw your opinions on this one, it's quire important. Krzysztof -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group. To post to this group, send email to castle-project-devel@.... To unsubscribe from this group, send email to castle-project-devel+unsubscribe@.... For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.
	Re: Versioning, dependencies, nuget and build server by hammett-2 :: Rate this Message: \| View Threaded \| Show Only this Message I'd vote for the simplest case. Release only the stuff with significant changes. Core + windsor in this case. 2011/11/13 Krzysztof Koźmic <krzysztof.kozmic@...>: > Hi guys, I hope everyone had (is still having) an awesome weekend. > > Please don't forget to throw your opinions on this one, it's quire > important. > > Krzysztof > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group. > To post to this group, send email to castle-project-devel@.... > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to castle-project-devel+unsubscribe@.... > For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en. > > -- Cheers, hammett http://hammett.castleproject.org/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group. To post to this group, send email to castle-project-devel@.... To unsubscribe from this group, send email to castle-project-devel+unsubscribe@.... For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.