|
View:
New views
20 Messages
—
Rating Filter:
Alert me
|
|
|
Very old repositoriesHi Tom & all,
In the repositories page we have repositories that remained untouched from one day to 2 years! http://code.nsnam.org/?sort=lastchange Should we remove let's say repositories that hasn't been touched for 1 year or more with owner's permission if any? Best regards Faker Moatamri |
|
|
Re: Very old repositories> In the repositories page we have repositories that remained untouched
> from one day to 2 years! > http://code.nsnam.org/?sort=lastchange > Should we remove let's say repositories that hasn't been touched for 1 > year or more with owner's permission if any? I'd like to remove the following kinds of repositories: 1) "*-old" repositories 2) all repositories, already merged into ns-3-dev 3) all ns-3{rc,RC}* repositories -- Andrey Mazo. |
|
|
Re: Very old repositoriesAndrey Mazo wrote:
>> In the repositories page we have repositories that remained untouched >> from one day to 2 years! >> http://code.nsnam.org/?sort=lastchange >> Should we remove let's say repositories that hasn't been touched for 1 >> year or more with owner's permission if any? > I'd like to remove the following kinds of repositories: > 1) "*-old" repositories > 2) all repositories, already merged into ns-3-dev > 3) all ns-3{rc,RC}* repositories > > Others? |
|
|
Re: Very old repositoriesIl giorno 22/ott/09, alle ore 16:12, Faker Moatamri ha scritto: > Andrey Mazo wrote: >>> In the repositories page we have repositories that remained >>> untouched >>> from one day to 2 years! >>> http://code.nsnam.org/?sort=lastchange >>> Should we remove let's say repositories that hasn't been touched >>> for 1 >>> year or more with owner's permission if any? >> I'd like to remove the following kinds of repositories: >> 1) "*-old" repositories >> 2) all repositories, already merged into ns-3-dev >> 3) all ns-3{rc,RC}* repositories >> >> > +1 from me if we are sure that the removed repositories are useless. > Others? Mirko -- Mirko Banchi e-mail: mk.banchi@... e-mail: mk.banchi@... id-jabber: mk.banchi@... PGP key fingerprint: 308F BFB1 4E67 2522 C88E DC69 7631 52ED 32A5 6456 |
|
|
Re: Very old repositoriesFaker Moatamri wrote:
> Hi Tom & all, > In the repositories page we have repositories that remained untouched > from one day to 2 years! > http://code.nsnam.org/?sort=lastchange > Should we remove let's say repositories that hasn't been touched for 1 > year or more with owner's permission if any? Faker, I would be fine with your suggested cleanup and Andrey's subsequent suggestion. I created a contributed/ folder on the web server to store some of the older repositories that may have some archival value: http://www.nsnam.org/wiki/index.php/Contributed_Code#Archived_repositories but I did not remove those repositories from code.nsnam.org. Developers should feel free to make use of this archive directory as they see fit; in general, it seems like 12 months is enough dormancy to move a repo to an archive. - Tom |
|
|
Re: Very old repositoriesTom Henderson wrote:
> Faker Moatamri wrote: >> Hi Tom & all, >> In the repositories page we have repositories that remained untouched >> from one day to 2 years! >> http://code.nsnam.org/?sort=lastchange >> Should we remove let's say repositories that hasn't been touched for >> 1 year or more with owner's permission if any? > > Faker, > I would be fine with your suggested cleanup and Andrey's subsequent > suggestion. I created a contributed/ folder on the web server to > store some of the older repositories that may have some archival value: > > http://www.nsnam.org/wiki/index.php/Contributed_Code#Archived_repositories > > > but I did not remove those repositories from code.nsnam.org. > As a first step to cleaning, I will remove the following repositories which are more that 1 year old on Wednesday October 28th at 10 am (GMT+1): raj/docs/wns2-ns-3-tutorial <http://code.nsnam.org/raj/docs/wns2-ns-3-tutorial/> WNS2 2008 Tutorial Files<raj.b@...> raj/ns-3-dev-http <http://code.nsnam.org/raj/ns-3-dev-http/> toy http model<raj.b@...> gjc/ns-3-wifi-scanning <http://code.nsnam.org/gjc/ns-3-wifi-scanning/> ns-3 experimental WiFi scanning<gjcarneiro@...> <gjc@...> ns-3.2 <http://code.nsnam.org/ns-3.2/> ns-3.2 release<ns-developers@...> ns-3.2-ref-traces <http://code.nsnam.org/ns-3.2-ref-traces/> reference traces for ns-3.2<ns-developers@...> gjc/ns-3-virtual-netdevice <http://code.nsnam.org/gjc/ns-3-virtual-netdevice/> unknownunknown lj/quagga-porting <http://code.nsnam.org/lj/quagga-porting/> quagga porting<liujatp@...> lj/ns-3-netlink <http://code.nsnam.org/lj/ns-3-netlink/> ns3 netlink sockets<liujatp@...> fw/ns-3-nsc-old <http://code.nsnam.org/fw/ns-3-nsc-old/> ns-3 Network Simulation Cradle portFlorian Westphal <fw@...> mathieu/ns-3-nam <http://code.nsnam.org/mathieu/ns-3-nam/> unknownunknown ns-3-sigcomm <http://code.nsnam.org/ns-3-sigcomm/> Sigcomm demo tree<tomh@...> pfeifer/ns-3-para <http://code.nsnam.org/pfeifer/ns-3-para/> ns-3 parallelized branch<hagen@...> ns-3.1 <http://code.nsnam.org/ns-3.1/> ns-3.1 relese<ns-developers@...> ns-3.1-ref-traces <http://code.nsnam.org/ns-3.1-ref-traces/> reference traces for ns-3.1<ns-developers@...> pfeifer/ns-3-para-mpi <http://code.nsnam.org/pfeifer/ns-3-para-mpi/> MPI infrastructure<hagen@...> docs <http://code.nsnam.org/docs/> s3 Documentation<ns-developers@...> mathieu/ns-3-yans <http://code.nsnam.org/mathieu/ns-3-yans/> unknownunknown Next step we will remove RC* repositories and Old repositories. If anyone has any objection, please tell us as soon as possible. Best regards Faker Moatamri > Developers should feel free to make use of this archive directory as > they see fit; in general, it seems like 12 months is enough dormancy > to move a repo to an archive. > > - Tom |
|
|
Re: Very old repositoriesFaker Moatamri wrote:
> Hi Tom and all, > As a first step to cleaning, I will remove the following repositories > which are more that 1 year old on Wednesday October 28th at 10 am > (GMT+1): > > raj/docs/wns2-ns-3-tutorial > <http://code.nsnam.org/raj/docs/wns2-ns-3-tutorial/> > WNS2 2008 Tutorial Files<raj.b@...> > raj/ns-3-dev-http > <http://code.nsnam.org/raj/ns-3-dev-http/> > toy http model<raj.b@...> > gjc/ns-3-wifi-scanning > <http://code.nsnam.org/gjc/ns-3-wifi-scanning/> > ns-3 experimental WiFi > scanning<gjcarneiro@...> <gjc@...> > ns-3.2 <http://code.nsnam.org/ns-3.2/> > ns-3.2 release<ns-developers@...> > ns-3.2-ref-traces > <http://code.nsnam.org/ns-3.2-ref-traces/> > reference traces for > ns-3.2<ns-developers@...> > gjc/ns-3-virtual-netdevice > <http://code.nsnam.org/gjc/ns-3-virtual-netdevice/> > unknownunknown > lj/quagga-porting > <http://code.nsnam.org/lj/quagga-porting/> > quagga porting<liujatp@...> > lj/ns-3-netlink > <http://code.nsnam.org/lj/ns-3-netlink/> > ns3 netlink sockets<liujatp@...> > fw/ns-3-nsc-old > <http://code.nsnam.org/fw/ns-3-nsc-old/> > ns-3 Network Simulation Cradle > portFlorian Westphal <fw@...> > mathieu/ns-3-nam <http://code.nsnam.org/mathieu/ns-3-nam/> > unknownunknown > ns-3-sigcomm <http://code.nsnam.org/ns-3-sigcomm/> > Sigcomm demo tree<tomh@...> > pfeifer/ns-3-para > <http://code.nsnam.org/pfeifer/ns-3-para/> > ns-3 parallelized > branch<hagen@...> > ns-3.1 <http://code.nsnam.org/ns-3.1/> > ns-3.1 relese<ns-developers@...> > ns-3.1-ref-traces > <http://code.nsnam.org/ns-3.1-ref-traces/> > reference traces for > ns-3.1<ns-developers@...> > pfeifer/ns-3-para-mpi > <http://code.nsnam.org/pfeifer/ns-3-para-mpi/> > MPI infrastructure<hagen@...> > docs <http://code.nsnam.org/docs/> > s3 Documentation<ns-developers@...> > mathieu/ns-3-yans > <http://code.nsnam.org/mathieu/ns-3-yans/> > unknownunknown > This has been done today as mentioned. > Next step we will remove RC* repositories and Old repositories. > Here is the new list of repositories to be removed on Friday October 30th at 10am (GMT+1): ns-3.6-RC4 ns-.6-RC3 release <ns-developers@...> 8 days ago ns-3.6-RC4-ref-traces reference traces for ns-3.6-RC3 release <ns-developers@...> 8 days ago ns-3.6-RC3 ns-.6-RC3 release <ns-developers@...> 12 days ago ns-3.6-RC3-ref-traces reference traces for ns-3.6-RC3 release <ns-developers@...> 12 days ago ns-3.6-RC2 ns-.6-RC2 release <ns-developers@...> 13 days ago ns-3.6-RC2-ref-traces reference traces for ns-3.6-RC2 release <ns-developers@...> 13 days ago ns-3.6-RC1 ns-.6-RC1 release <ns-developers@...> 2 weeks ago ns-3.6-RC1-ref-traces reference traces for ns-3.6-RC1 release <ns-developers@...> 2 weeks ago iamine/ns-3-wimax-to_be_released wimax module for ns-3 to be merged with the main ns-3-dev tree <amine.ismail@...> 2 months ago ns-3-wimax-to_be_released_old2 wimax module for ns-3 to be merged with the main ns-3-dev tree <amine.ismail@...> 2 months ago ns-3-wimax-to_be_released_old wimax module for ns-3 to be merged with the main ns-3-dev tree <amine.ismail@...> 2 months ago ns-3-wimax-dev-old unknown unknown 3 months ago ns-3.4-RC3 ns-3.4-RC3 release <ns-developers@...> 7 months ago ns-3.4-RC3-ref-traces reference traces for ns-3.4-RC3 release <ns-developers@...> 7 months ago ns-3.4-RC2 ns-3.4-RC2 release <ns-developers@...> 7 months ago ns-3.4-RC2-ref-traces reference traces for ns-3.4-RC2 release <ns-developers@...> 7 months ago ns-3.4-RC1 ns-3.4-RC1 release <ns-developers@...> 7 months ago ns-3.4-RC1-ref-traces reference traces for ns-3.4-RC1 release <ns-developers@...> 7 months ago craigdo/ns-3-test-patches-old Mercurial Queues patches repository backup for ns-3 testing development <craigdo@...> 2 months ago ns-3-wimax-old ns-3 wimax development tree <amine.ismail@...> 10 months ago mathieu/ns-3-simu-old unknown unknown 10 months ago vincent/ns-3-ipv6-1st NS-3 simulator with IPv6 support (first chunk). unknown 11 months ago *For the vincent/ns-3-ipv6-1st I need green light to remove it, does it need to be archived? *If you have any objection to remove any of the above repositories, please tell me as soon as possible. Best regards Faker Moatamri |
|
|
Re: Very old repositoriesFaker Moatamri a écrit :
> Faker Moatamri wrote: >> Hi Tom and all, >> As a first step to cleaning, I will remove the following repositories >> which are more that 1 year old on Wednesday October 28th at 10 am >> (GMT+1): >> >> raj/docs/wns2-ns-3-tutorial >> <http://code.nsnam.org/raj/docs/wns2-ns-3-tutorial/> >> WNS2 2008 Tutorial Files<raj.b@...> >> raj/ns-3-dev-http >> <http://code.nsnam.org/raj/ns-3-dev-http/> >> toy http model<raj.b@...> >> gjc/ns-3-wifi-scanning >> <http://code.nsnam.org/gjc/ns-3-wifi-scanning/> >> ns-3 experimental WiFi >> scanning<gjcarneiro@...> <gjc@...> >> ns-3.2 >> <http://code.nsnam.org/ns-3.2/> >> ns-3.2 release<ns-developers@...> >> ns-3.2-ref-traces >> <http://code.nsnam.org/ns-3.2-ref-traces/> >> reference traces for >> ns-3.2<ns-developers@...> >> gjc/ns-3-virtual-netdevice >> <http://code.nsnam.org/gjc/ns-3-virtual-netdevice/> >> unknownunknown >> lj/quagga-porting >> <http://code.nsnam.org/lj/quagga-porting/> >> quagga porting<liujatp@...> >> lj/ns-3-netlink >> <http://code.nsnam.org/lj/ns-3-netlink/> >> ns3 netlink sockets<liujatp@...> >> fw/ns-3-nsc-old >> <http://code.nsnam.org/fw/ns-3-nsc-old/> >> ns-3 Network Simulation Cradle >> portFlorian Westphal <fw@...> >> mathieu/ns-3-nam <http://code.nsnam.org/mathieu/ns-3-nam/> >> unknownunknown >> ns-3-sigcomm <http://code.nsnam.org/ns-3-sigcomm/> >> Sigcomm demo tree<tomh@...> >> pfeifer/ns-3-para >> <http://code.nsnam.org/pfeifer/ns-3-para/> >> ns-3 parallelized >> branch<hagen@...> >> ns-3.1 <http://code.nsnam.org/ns-3.1/> >> ns-3.1 relese<ns-developers@...> >> ns-3.1-ref-traces >> <http://code.nsnam.org/ns-3.1-ref-traces/> >> reference traces for >> ns-3.1<ns-developers@...> >> pfeifer/ns-3-para-mpi >> <http://code.nsnam.org/pfeifer/ns-3-para-mpi/> >> MPI infrastructure<hagen@...> >> docs >> <http://code.nsnam.org/docs/> >> s3 Documentation<ns-developers@...> >> mathieu/ns-3-yans >> <http://code.nsnam.org/mathieu/ns-3-yans/> >> unknownunknown >> > Hi Tom and All, > This has been done today as mentioned. >> Next step we will remove RC* repositories and Old repositories. >> > Here is the new list of repositories to be removed on Friday October > 30th at 10am (GMT+1): > ns-3.6-RC4 ns-.6-RC3 > release <ns-developers@...> 8 days ago > ns-3.6-RC4-ref-traces reference traces for > ns-3.6-RC3 release <ns-developers@...> 8 days ago > ns-3.6-RC3 ns-.6-RC3 > release <ns-developers@...> 12 days ago > ns-3.6-RC3-ref-traces reference traces for > ns-3.6-RC3 release <ns-developers@...> 12 days ago > ns-3.6-RC2 ns-.6-RC2 > release <ns-developers@...> 13 days ago > ns-3.6-RC2-ref-traces reference traces for > ns-3.6-RC2 release <ns-developers@...> 13 days ago > ns-3.6-RC1 ns-.6-RC1 > release <ns-developers@...> 2 weeks ago > ns-3.6-RC1-ref-traces reference traces for > ns-3.6-RC1 release <ns-developers@...> 2 weeks ago > iamine/ns-3-wimax-to_be_released wimax module for ns-3 to be > merged with the main ns-3-dev tree > <amine.ismail@...> 2 months ago > ns-3-wimax-to_be_released_old2 wimax module for ns-3 to be > merged with the main ns-3-dev tree > <amine.ismail@...> 2 months ago > ns-3-wimax-to_be_released_old wimax module for ns-3 to be > merged with the main ns-3-dev tree > <amine.ismail@...> 2 months ago > ns-3-wimax-dev-old unknown unknown 3 > months ago ns-3.4-RC3 > ns-3.4-RC3 release <ns-developers@...> 7 months ago > ns-3.4-RC3-ref-traces reference traces for > ns-3.4-RC3 release <ns-developers@...> 7 months ago > ns-3.4-RC2 ns-3.4-RC2 > release <ns-developers@...> 7 months ago > ns-3.4-RC2-ref-traces reference traces for > ns-3.4-RC2 release <ns-developers@...> 7 months ago > ns-3.4-RC1 ns-3.4-RC1 > release <ns-developers@...> 7 months ago > ns-3.4-RC1-ref-traces reference traces for > ns-3.4-RC1 release <ns-developers@...> 7 months ago > craigdo/ns-3-test-patches-old Mercurial Queues patches > repository backup for ns-3 testing development > <craigdo@...> 2 months ago > ns-3-wimax-old ns-3 wimax > development tree <amine.ismail@...> 10 months ago > mathieu/ns-3-simu-old unknown unknown > 10 months ago vincent/ns-3-ipv6-1st NS-3 > simulator with IPv6 support (first chunk). unknown 11 months ago > > *For the vincent/ns-3-ipv6-1st I need green light to remove it, does > it need to be archived? You can remove it as code has been merged in ns-3-dev now. > *If you have any objection to remove any of the above repositories, > please tell me as soon as possible. > Best regards > Faker Moatamri > > |
|
|
Re: Very old repositoriesOn Wed, 2009-10-28 at 10:51 +0100, Faker Moatamri wrote:
> mathieu/ns-3-simu-old unknown unknown > 10 months ago > If you have any objection to remove any of the above repositories, > please tell me as soon as possible. I am pretty careful in removing uneeded repositories from mathieu/* so, if something is still in there, it means that it has not been merged in another repository yet which means that I would prefer to leave it there. Mathieu |
|
|
Re: Very old repositoriesMathieu Lacage wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-10-28 at 10:51 +0100, Faker Moatamri wrote: > >> mathieu/ns-3-simu-old unknown unknown >> 10 months ago >> If you have any objection to remove any of the above repositories, >> please tell me as soon as possible. >> > > I am pretty careful in removing uneeded repositories from mathieu/* so, > if something is still in there, it means that it has not been merged in > another repository yet which means that I would prefer to leave it > there. > > untouched for nearly one year... Anyone else has any objection on the removal of repositories from this list: ns-3.6-RC4 ns-.6-RC3 release <ns-developers@...> 8 days ago ns-3.6-RC4-ref-traces reference traces for ns-3.6-RC3 release <ns-developers@...> 8 days ago ns-3.6-RC3 ns-.6-RC3 release <ns-developers@...> 12 days ago ns-3.6-RC3-ref-traces reference traces for ns-3.6-RC3 release <ns-developers@...> 12 days ago ns-3.6-RC2 ns-.6-RC2 release <ns-developers@...> 13 days ago ns-3.6-RC2-ref-traces reference traces for ns-3.6-RC2 release <ns-developers@...> 13 days ago ns-3.6-RC1 ns-.6-RC1 release <ns-developers@...> 2 weeks ago ns-3.6-RC1-ref-traces reference traces for ns-3.6-RC1 release <ns-developers@...> 2 weeks ago iamine/ns-3-wimax-to_be_released wimax module for ns-3 to be merged with the main ns-3-dev tree <amine.ismail@...> 2 months ago ns-3-wimax-to_be_released_old2 wimax module for ns-3 to be merged with the main ns-3-dev tree <amine.ismail@...> 2 months ago ns-3-wimax-to_be_released_old wimax module for ns-3 to be merged with the main ns-3-dev tree <amine.ismail@...> 2 months ago ns-3-wimax-dev-old unknown unknown 3 months ago ns-3.4-RC3 ns-3.4-RC3 release <ns-developers@...> 7 months ago ns-3.4-RC3-ref-traces reference traces for ns-3.4-RC3 release <ns-developers@...> 7 months ago ns-3.4-RC2 ns-3.4-RC2 release <ns-developers@...> 7 months ago ns-3.4-RC2-ref-traces reference traces for ns-3.4-RC2 release <ns-developers@...> 7 months ago ns-3.4-RC1 ns-3.4-RC1 release <ns-developers@...> 7 months ago ns-3.4-RC1-ref-traces reference traces for ns-3.4-RC1 release <ns-developers@...> 7 months ago craigdo/ns-3-test-patches-old Mercurial Queues patches repository backup for ns-3 testing development <craigdo@...> 2 months ago ns-3-wimax-old ns-3 wimax development tree <amine.ismail@...> 10 months ago vincent/ns-3-ipv6-1st NS-3 simulator with IPv6 support (first chunk). unknown 11 months ago > Mathieu > > Best regards Faker Moatamri |
|
|
Re: Very old repositories2009/10/29 Faker Moatamri <faker.moatamri@...>
> Mathieu Lacage wrote: > >> On Wed, 2009-10-28 at 10:51 +0100, Faker Moatamri wrote: >> >> >>> mathieu/ns-3-simu-old unknown unknown >>> 10 months ago If you have any objection to remove any of the above >>> repositories, >>> please tell me as soon as possible. >>> >>> >> >> I am pretty careful in removing uneeded repositories from mathieu/* so, >> if something is still in there, it means that it has not been merged in >> another repository yet which means that I would prefer to leave it >> there. >> >> >> > Ok we will keep your repository. Should we archive it? It remained > untouched for nearly one year... > > Anyone else has any objection on the removal of repositories from this > list: If by remove you mean archive (the way I see now, with a tar.bzw download option, is ok), then fine by me. Just don't delete the repository files forever! > > ns-3.6-RC4 ns-.6-RC3 release > <ns-developers@...> 8 days ago ns-3.6-RC4-ref-traces > reference traces for ns-3.6-RC3 release < > ns-developers@...> 8 days ago ns-3.6-RC3 > ns-.6-RC3 release <ns-developers@...> 12 days > ago ns-3.6-RC3-ref-traces reference traces for > ns-3.6-RC3 release <ns-developers@...> 12 days ago ns-3.6-RC2 > ns-.6-RC2 release < > ns-developers@...> 13 days ago ns-3.6-RC2-ref-traces > reference traces for ns-3.6-RC2 release < > ns-developers@...> 13 days ago ns-3.6-RC1 > ns-.6-RC1 release <ns-developers@...> 2 weeks > ago ns-3.6-RC1-ref-traces reference traces for > ns-3.6-RC1 release <ns-developers@...> 2 weeks ago > iamine/ns-3-wimax-to_be_released wimax module for ns-3 to be merged with > the main ns-3-dev tree <amine.ismail@...> 2 months ago > ns-3-wimax-to_be_released_old2 wimax module for ns-3 to be merged > with the main ns-3-dev tree <amine.ismail@...> 2 months > ago ns-3-wimax-to_be_released_old wimax module for ns-3 to be > merged with the main ns-3-dev tree <amine.ismail@...> 2 > months ago ns-3-wimax-dev-old unknown > unknown 3 months ago ns-3.4-RC3 > ns-3.4-RC3 release <ns-developers@...> 7 months ago > ns-3.4-RC3-ref-traces reference traces for > ns-3.4-RC3 release <ns-developers@...> 7 months ago ns-3.4-RC2 > ns-3.4-RC2 release < > ns-developers@...> 7 months ago ns-3.4-RC2-ref-traces > reference traces for ns-3.4-RC2 release < > ns-developers@...> 7 months ago ns-3.4-RC1 > ns-3.4-RC1 release <ns-developers@...> 7 > months ago ns-3.4-RC1-ref-traces reference > traces for ns-3.4-RC1 release <ns-developers@...> 7 months ago > craigdo/ns-3-test-patches-old Mercurial Queues patches > repository backup for ns-3 testing development < > craigdo@...> 2 months ago > ns-3-wimax-old ns-3 wimax development > tree <amine.ismail@...> 10 months ago > vincent/ns-3-ipv6-1st NS-3 simulator with IPv6 > support (first chunk). unknown 11 months ago > >> Mathieu >> >> >> > Best regards > Faker Moatamri > > -- Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro INESC Porto, Telecommunications and Multimedia Unit "The universe is always one step beyond logic." -- Frank Herbert |
|
|
Re: Very old repositoriesGustavo Carneiro wrote:
> > > 2009/10/29 Faker Moatamri <faker.moatamri@... > <mailto:faker.moatamri@...>> > > Mathieu Lacage wrote: > > On Wed, 2009-10-28 at 10:51 +0100, Faker Moatamri wrote: > > > mathieu/ns-3-simu-old unknown > unknown > 10 months ago If you have any objection to remove any > of the above repositories, > please tell me as soon as possible. > > > > I am pretty careful in removing uneeded repositories from > mathieu/* so, > if something is still in there, it means that it has not been > merged in > another repository yet which means that I would prefer to leave it > there. > > > > Ok we will keep your repository. Should we archive it? It remained > untouched for nearly one year... > > Anyone else has any objection on the removal of repositories from > this list: > > > If by remove you mean archive (the way I see now, with a tar.bzw > download option, is ok), then fine by me. Just don't delete the > repository files forever! and some have been already merged. Also there is no point of keeping 4 release candidates if we have the release itself, right? Tom archived the ones that he thought might be of interest in the future and that were never merged. We currently have 89 repos 51 of which remained untouched for more than 4 months (including RCs). |
|
|
Re: Very old repositories2009/10/29 Faker Moatamri <faker.moatamri@...>
> Gustavo Carneiro wrote: > >> >> >> 2009/10/29 Faker Moatamri <faker.moatamri@... <mailto: >> faker.moatamri@...>> >> >> >> Mathieu Lacage wrote: >> >> On Wed, 2009-10-28 at 10:51 +0100, Faker Moatamri wrote: >> >> mathieu/ns-3-simu-old unknown >> unknown >> 10 months ago If you have any objection to remove any >> of the above repositories, >> please tell me as soon as possible. >> >> >> I am pretty careful in removing uneeded repositories from >> mathieu/* so, >> if something is still in there, it means that it has not been >> merged in >> another repository yet which means that I would prefer to leave it >> there. >> >> >> Ok we will keep your repository. Should we archive it? It remained >> untouched for nearly one year... >> >> Anyone else has any objection on the removal of repositories from >> this list: >> >> >> If by remove you mean archive (the way I see now, with a tar.bzw download >> option, is ok), then fine by me. Just don't delete the repository files >> forever! >> > I mean delete delete, forever, a lot of repositories are just duplicates > and some have been already merged. Also there is no point of keeping 4 > release candidates if we have the release itself, right? > Tom archived the ones that he thought might be of interest in the future > and that were never merged. We currently have 89 repos 51 of which remained > untouched for more than 4 months (including RCs). > Some of the repos have not been merged and contain the start of some useful work. For instance, gjc/ns-3-wifi-scanning is incomplete, but if someone had time and inclination to finish the work, they could conceivably learn something from my old repository, maybe even copy some code. It's a pity to just obliterate it forever. If you keep around 100 repos in tar.bz2 format, at 10 MB each, that adds to 1GB. Hardly difficult with today's hard disk capacities. So I don't understand why so anxious to delete everything... If a branch was not merged into ns-3-dev, I think you should keep it around somehow, for at least a few years. -- Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro INESC Porto, Telecommunications and Multimedia Unit "The universe is always one step beyond logic." -- Frank Herbert |
|
|
Re: Very old repositoriesGustavo Carneiro wrote:
> > > 2009/10/29 Faker Moatamri <faker.moatamri@... > <mailto:faker.moatamri@...>> > > > > If by remove you mean archive (the way I see now, with a > tar.bzw download option, is ok), then fine by me. Just don't > delete the repository files forever! > > I mean delete delete, forever, a lot of repositories are just > duplicates and some have been already merged. Also there is no > point of keeping 4 release candidates if we have the release > itself, right? > Tom archived the ones that he thought might be of interest in the > future and that were never merged. We currently have 89 repos 51 > of which remained untouched for more than 4 months (including RCs). > > > Some of the repos have not been merged and contain the start of some > useful work. For instance, gjc/ns-3-wifi-scanning is incomplete, but > if someone had time and inclination to finish the work, they could > conceivably learn something from my old repository, maybe even copy > some code. It's a pity to just obliterate it forever. asking permission from the owners of the repos before deleting. I need to make sure it is really useless. > > If you keep around 100 repos in tar.bz2 format, at 10 MB each, that > adds to 1GB. Hardly difficult with today's hard disk capacities. So > I don't understand why so anxious to delete everything... Yes of course, it never has been a matter of disk space. Actually, I'm not planning to delete everything, and that's why I'm asking people if I can delete before actually deleting. I will delete *only 100% useless repos*, the others we will archive them or we will keep them in the repo. Is that ok with you? If you still think that we should systematically archive all the deleted repos, I have no problem with that. It's just that I find it useless in the only case that we are 100% that the repo has no interest. > > If a branch was not merged into ns-3-dev, I think you should keep it > around somehow, for at least a few years. Yes sure, that's what Tom did and what I will do. Actually I think that if it is less than one year old, I will leave it in the repo, if it is older that that, it will go to Tom's archive in the wiki page. > > -- > Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro > INESC Porto, Telecommunications and Multimedia Unit > "The universe is always one step beyond logic." -- Frank Herbert Best regard, Faker Moatamri |
|
|
Re: Very old repositories2009/10/29 Faker Moatamri <faker.moatamri@...>
> Gustavo Carneiro wrote: > >> >> >> 2009/10/29 Faker Moatamri <faker.moatamri@... <mailto: >> faker.moatamri@...>> >> >> >> >> If by remove you mean archive (the way I see now, with a >> tar.bzw download option, is ok), then fine by me. Just don't >> delete the repository files forever! >> >> I mean delete delete, forever, a lot of repositories are just >> duplicates and some have been already merged. Also there is no >> point of keeping 4 release candidates if we have the release >> itself, right? >> Tom archived the ones that he thought might be of interest in the >> future and that were never merged. We currently have 89 repos 51 >> of which remained untouched for more than 4 months (including RCs). >> >> >> Some of the repos have not been merged and contain the start of some >> useful work. For instance, gjc/ns-3-wifi-scanning is incomplete, but if >> someone had time and inclination to finish the work, they could conceivably >> learn something from my old repository, maybe even copy some code. It's a >> pity to just obliterate it forever. >> > Those won't be deleted or at least they will be archived. That's why I'm > asking permission from the owners of the repos before deleting. I need to > make sure it is really useless. OK, in that case. from my repos you can really delete (since wifi-scanning seems to be already moved to the wiki as tar.bz2): gjc/ns-3-allinone <http://code.nsnam.org/gjc/ns-3-allinone/> gjc/ns-3-tap-netdevice <http://code.nsnam.org/gjc/ns-3-tap-netdevice/> gjc/ns-3-waf1.5 <http://code.nsnam.org/gjc/ns-3-waf1.5/> gjc/ns-3-waf154 <http://code.nsnam.org/gjc/ns-3-waf154/> gjc/ns-3-dev-flowmon <http://code.nsnam.org/gjc/ns-3-dev-flowmon/> You should keep for a long time: gjc/ns-3-flowmon <http://code.nsnam.org/gjc/ns-3-flowmon/> (some benchmark scripts in there that are not ported to ns-3-dev, so it's not really 100% merged) You should definitely keep, forever until further notice: gjc/ns-3-pyviz <http://code.nsnam.org/gjc/ns-3-pyviz/> (lack of time to work on this, but I think this is a cool project) Thanks, -- Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro INESC Porto, Telecommunications and Multimedia Unit "The universe is always one step beyond logic." -- Frank Herbert |
|
|
Re: Very old repositoriesHi Faker,
Please do not delete any repos under craigdo. It is clean with the exception of a branch useful to folks running ns-3 on ORBIT (and required by a HOWTO). Regards, -- Craig |
|
|
Re: Very old repositoriesns-3.6-RC4 ns-.6-RC3
release <ns-developers@...> 8 days ago ns-3.6-RC4-ref-traces reference traces for ns-3.6-RC3 release <ns-developers@...> 8 days ago ns-3.6-RC3 ns-.6-RC3 release <ns-developers@...> 12 days ago ns-3.6-RC3-ref-traces reference traces for ns-3.6-RC3 release <ns-developers@...> 12 days ago ns-3.6-RC2 ns-.6-RC2 release <ns-developers@...> 13 days ago ns-3.6-RC2-ref-traces reference traces for ns-3.6-RC2 release <ns-developers@...> 13 days ago ns-3.6-RC1 ns-.6-RC1 release <ns-developers@...> 2 weeks ago ns-3.6-RC1-ref-traces reference traces for ns-3.6-RC1 release <ns-developers@...> 2 weeks ago iamine/ns-3-wimax-to_be_released wimax module for ns-3 to be merged with the main ns-3-dev tree <amine.ismail@...> 2 months ago ns-3-wimax-to_be_released_old2 wimax module for ns-3 to be merged with the main ns-3-dev tree <amine.ismail@...> 2 months ago ns-3-wimax-to_be_released_old wimax module for ns-3 to be merged with the main ns-3-dev tree <amine.ismail@...> 2 months ago ns-3-wimax-dev-old unknown unknown 3 months ago ns-3.4-RC3 ns-3.4-RC3 release <ns-developers@...> 7 months ago ns-3.4-RC3-ref-traces reference traces for ns-3.4-RC3 release <ns-developers@...> 7 months ago ns-3.4-RC2 ns-3.4-RC2 release <ns-developers@...> 7 months ago ns-3.4-RC2-ref-traces reference traces for ns-3.4-RC2 release <ns-developers@...> 7 months ago ns-3.4-RC1 ns-3.4-RC1 release <ns-developers@...> 7 months ago ns-3.4-RC1-ref-traces reference traces for ns-3.4-RC1 release <ns-developers@...> 7 months ago ns-3-wimax-old ns-3 wimax development tree <amine.ismail@...> 10 months ago vincent/ns-3-ipv6-1st NS-3 simulator with IPv6 support (first chunk). unknown 11 months ago > gjc/ns-3-allinone <http://code.nsnam.org/gjc/ns-3-allinone/> > gjc/ns-3-tap-netdevice <http://code.nsnam.org/gjc/ns-3-tap-netdevice/> > gjc/ns-3-waf1.5 <http://code.nsnam.org/gjc/ns-3-waf1.5/> > gjc/ns-3-waf154 <http://code.nsnam.org/gjc/ns-3-waf154/> > gjc/ns-3-dev-flowmon <http://code.nsnam.org/gjc/ns-3-dev-flowmon/> > Ok done. Now we need to know about those repos, which ones we should keep/archive/delete: guillaume/ns-3-multithreading unknown unknown 2 months ago guillaume/ns-3-multithreading-new unknown unknown 2 months ago guillaume/ns-3-multithreading-new/.hg/patches unknown unknown 2 months ago guillaume/ns-3-multithreading-old ns-3 multithreaded simulator implementation Guillaume Seguin <guillaume.seguin@...> 3 months ago guillaume/ns-3-multithreading/.hg/patches unknown unknown 2 months ago raj/ns-3-dev unknown unknown 7 months ago raj/ns-3-netanim unknown unknown 7 months ago raj/ns-3-rng-changes unknown unknown 8 months ago raj/ns-3-rng-changes-ref-traces unknown unknown 8 months ago raj/ns-3-tcp unknown unknown 7 months ago raj/ns-3-tcp-ref-traces unknown unknown 7 months ago Thanks for your cooperation :-) Faker Moatamri |
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Very old repositoriesOn 04 nov. 2009 à 18:53:15 (+0100), Faker Moatamri wrote :
> Mathieu, Guillaume what about the repositories under guillaume? What is > to keep/archive/delete? I think you can archive ns-3-multithreading-old and delete ns-3-multithreading-new. I also think that ns-3-multithreading is not up to date, I'll check asap. Guillaume |
|
|
Re: Very old repositoriesGuillaume Seguin wrote:
> > I think you can archive ns-3-multithreading-old and delete > ns-3-multithreading-new. I also think that ns-3-multithreading is not up to > date, I'll check asap. > > Guillaume > Hi all, Hi Guillaume, As promised, I removed raj/ repositories Removed ns-3-multithreading-new I will leave ns-3-multithreading-old in the repositories until it got old enough to be moved to archive, unless you are sure that no one will use it. For ns-3-multithreading I will wait until you tell me if it is out of date or not. Best regards Faker Moatamri |
| Free embeddable forum powered by Nabble | Forum Help |