W3C Spec Test in Opera 9.2 WebBrowser
|
View:
New views
7 Messages
—
Rating Filter:
Alert me
|
 |
W3C Spec Test in Opera 9.2 WebBrowser
by 돼지말린효과
::
Rate this Message:
http://www.w3.org/Style/CSS/Test/CSS2.1/current/t1205-c565-list-pos-00-b.htm
I tried to test this URL in Opera 9.2 WebBrowser. But I saw that the two navy boxed were different on windows xp in my computer. Why were they differenet? I heard that Opera Web browser passed the all spec test. I think that Opera WebBrowser uses a special font. Is it right? If it is right, what a font does Opera 9.2 WebBrowser use? |
|
|
Re: W3C Spec Test in Opera 9.2 WebBrowser
by fantasai
::
Rate this Message:
돼지말린효과 wrote: > http://www.w3.org/Style/CSS/Test/CSS2.1/current/t1205-c565-list-pos-00-b.htm > > I tried to test this URL in Opera 9.2 WebBrowser. > > But I saw that the two navy boxed were different on windows xp in my > computer. > > Why were they differenet? > > I heard that Opera Web browser passed the all spec test. That's impossible. Even if Opera had perfect support for CSS2.1, there are many tests in the test suite that are wrong. > I think that Opera WebBrowser uses a special font. > > Is it right? If it is right, what a font does Opera 9.2 WebBrowser use? It's not a font issue. If you download the test and tweak it so that all the colors are white and none are navy, you will see that the reason Opera fails this test is that its spacing between the period in the list marker and the beginning of the text content is different from the width of a space. That said, I don't see any statement in CSS2.1 that backs up this test, so it is invalid and should be removed. Thanks for bringing it up. ~fantasai |
|
|
Re: W3C Spec Test in Opera 9.2 WebBrowser
by 돼지말린효과
::
Rate this Message:
>That said, I don't see any statement in CSS2.1 that backs up this test, so
>it is invalid and should be removed. Thanks for bringing it up. Thank you for your answer. I have another question. How do you know that this test is invalid and should be removed? Is it a w3c's policy? |
|
|
Re: W3C Spec Test in Opera 9.2 WebBrowser
by fantasai
::
Rate this Message:
돼지말린효과 wrote: > >> That said, I don't see any statement in CSS2.1 that backs up this test, so >> it is invalid and should be removed. Thanks for bringing it up. > > Thank you for your answer. > > I have another question. > > How do you know that this test is invalid and should be removed? Because there is no sentence in the spec, that I can see, that would justify the assertion the test is making. > Is it a w3c's policy? To have a correct test suite rather than an incorrect one? I should hope so. ~fantasai |
|
|
Review Request: t1205-c565-list-pos-00-b
by fantasai
::
Rate this Message:
fantasai wrote:
> > 돼지말린효과 wrote: >> http://www.w3.org/Style/CSS/Test/CSS2.1/current/t1205-c565-list-pos-00-b.htm >> >> I tried to test this URL in Opera 9.2 WebBrowser. >> >> But I saw that the two navy boxed were different on windows xp in my >> computer. ... > > That said, I don't see any statement in CSS2.1 that backs up this test, so > it is invalid and should be removed. Thanks for bringing it up. This test http://www.w3.org/Style/CSS/Test/CSS2.1/20061011/t1205-c565-list-pos-00-b.htm was taken from the CSS1 test suite. The original test is here: http://www.w3.org/Style/CSS/Test/CSS1/20070302/sec565.htm The original test is valid afaict: it is testing list-style-position. However the CSS2.1 version is invalid and should be removed. I've written a pair of tests to replace it, based on the original CSS1 test. Anyone willing to review them so I can add them to the test suite? ~fantasai <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.1//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml11/DTD/xhtml11.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <title>CSS 2.1 Test Suite: list-style-position</title> <link rel="author" title="CSS1 Test Suite Contributors" href="http://www.w3.org/Style/CSS/Test/CSS1/current/tsack.html"/> <link rel="author" title="Elika J. Etemad" href="http://fantasai.inkedblade.net/contact"/> <meta name="assert" content="The marker box is outside the principal block box."/> <style type="text/css"><![CDATA[ li { width: 10em; margin: 0.5em 5em; padding: 0; list-style-position: outside; background: navy; color: blue; } ]]></style> </head> <body> <p>There must be a navy rectangle below, preceded by a blue bullet.</p> <ul> <li> </li> </ul> </body> </html> <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.1//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml11/DTD/xhtml11.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <title>CSS 2.1 Test Suite: list-style-position</title> <link rel="author" title="CSS1 Test Suite Contributors" href="http://www.w3.org/Style/CSS/Test/CSS1/current/tsack.html"/> <link rel="author" title="Elika J. Etemad" href="http://fantasai.inkedblade.net/contact"/> <meta name="assert" content="The marker box is outside the principal block box."/> <style type="text/css"><![CDATA[ li { width: 10em; margin: 0.5em 5em; padding: 0; list-style-position: inside; background: navy; color: white; } ]]></style> </head> <body> <p>There must be a navy rectangle below, with a white bullet inside.</p> <ul> <li> </li> </ul> </body> </html> |
|
|
RE: Review Request: t1205-c565-list-pos-00-b
by Grant, Melinda
::
Rate this Message:
fantasai said: > I've written a pair of tests to replace it, based on the > original CSS1 test. > Anyone willing to review them so I can add them to the test suite? The assert meta in css1test565b suffers from a cut and paste error: s/outside/inside; I would consider using 'dot' rather than 'bullet' to describe the output, as in "There must be a blue dot outside and to the left of the navy rectangle below:" Otherwise, they look good to me. Best wishes, Melinda > -----Original Message----- > From: public-css-testsuite-request@... > [mailto:public-css-testsuite-request@...] On Behalf Of fantasai > Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2007 7:55 PM > To: public-css-testsuite@... > Subject: Review Request: t1205-c565-list-pos-00-b > > fantasai wrote: > > > > 돼지말린효과 wrote: > >> > http://www.w3.org/Style/CSS/Test/CSS2.1/current/t1205-c565-list-pos-0 > >> 0-b.htm > >> > >> I tried to test this URL in Opera 9.2 WebBrowser. > >> > >> But I saw that the two navy boxed were different on > windows xp in my > >> computer. > ... > > > > That said, I don't see any statement in CSS2.1 that backs up this > > test, so it is invalid and should be removed. Thanks for > bringing it up. > > This test > > http://www.w3.org/Style/CSS/Test/CSS2.1/20061011/t1205-c565-li > st-pos-00-b.htm > was taken from the CSS1 test suite. The original test is here: > http://www.w3.org/Style/CSS/Test/CSS1/20070302/sec565.htm > The original test is valid afaict: it is testing > list-style-position. However the CSS2.1 version is invalid > and should be removed. > > I've written a pair of tests to replace it, based on the > original CSS1 test. > Anyone willing to review them so I can add them to the test suite? > > ~fantasai > |
|
|
Re: Review Request: t1205-c565-list-pos-00-b
by fantasai
::
Rate this Message:
Grant, Melinda wrote: > > fantasai said: >> I've written a pair of tests to replace it, based on the original CSS1 test. >> Anyone willing to review them so I can add them to the test suite? > > The assert meta in css1test565b suffers from a cut and paste error: > s/outside/inside; Fixed. > I would consider using 'dot' rather than 'bullet' to describe the output, as > in "There must be a blue dot outside and to the left of the navy rectangle > below:" I didn't make this change because the CSS spec doesn't specify that the bullet should look like a dot.. it could be a triangle or something. > Otherwise, they look good to me. Ok, fix checked in. ~fantasai |
| Free embeddable forum powered by Nabble | Forum Help |
