What happened to the typeid/type_info proposal?

View: New views
3 Messages — Rating Filter:   Alert me  

What happened to the typeid/type_info proposal?

by Johan Torp :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

I have seen several discussions regarding adding a small
typeid/type_info library similar to
the one introduced by Alexandrescu in Modern C++ Design.

Has there been any progress on this issue?

see:
http://lists.boost.org/Archives/boost/2005/02/80969.php

Best Regards, Johan Torp
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost

Re: What happened to the typeid/type_info proposal?

by Andrey Semashev :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

Hello Johan,

Friday, May 25, 2007, 3:56:24 PM, you wrote:

> I have seen several discussions regarding adding a small
> typeid/type_info library similar to
> the one introduced by Alexandrescu in Modern C++ Design.

> Has there been any progress on this issue?

> see:
> http://lists.boost.org/Archives/boost/2005/02/80969.php

In my Boost.Log library implementation I have such type_info wrapper.
I proposed to extract it from the library as a separate header in the
Boost.Log alpha announcement not long ago, but I got no feedback.

In case if you're interested, the implementation is in the Vault:

http://tinyurl.com/3cdg88

You may find the wrapper in boost/log/detail/type_info_wrapper.hpp.
If it is considered to be worth extracting from the library, I could
easily do that.

--
Best regards,
 Andrey                            mailto:andysem@...

_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost

Re: What happened to the typeid/type_info proposal?

by Johan Torp :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

Andrey Semashev wrote:
You may find the wrapper in boost/log/detail/type_info_wrapper.hpp.
If it is considered to be worth extracting from the library, I could
easily do that.
I am definitely interested! I believe others are too since it has been proposed in the past.

--Johan