|
»
What to do with the trunk?
|
View:
New views
11 Messages
—
Rating Filter:
Alert me
|
 |
What to do with the trunk?
by John Simons
::
Rate this Message:
Now that all projects have been migrated into their own folders, what is the plan for the trunk? The trunk currently still has the following: - docs - Experiments - Samples - Setup - SharedLibs - Tools/VSNetWizards - Facilities/DynamicLoader - Facilities/EventWiring - Facilities/FactorySupport - Facilities/Remoting - Facilities/TypedFactory Should we wait for the MonoRail release and after that get rid of it? Cheers John --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group. To post to this group, send email to castle-project-devel@... To unsubscribe from this group, send email to castle-project-devel+unsubscribe@... For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~--- |
|
|
Re: What to do with the trunk?
by Krzysztof Koźmic
::
Rate this Message:
+1 for removing it after MR release John Simons wrote: > Now that all projects have been migrated into their own folders, what > is the plan for the trunk? > > The trunk currently still has the following: > - docs > - Experiments > - Samples > - Setup > - SharedLibs > - Tools/VSNetWizards > - Facilities/DynamicLoader > - Facilities/EventWiring > - Facilities/FactorySupport > - Facilities/Remoting > - Facilities/TypedFactory > > Should we wait for the MonoRail release and after that get rid of it? > > Cheers > John > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group. To post to this group, send email to castle-project-devel@... To unsubscribe from this group, send email to castle-project-devel+unsubscribe@... For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~--- |
|
|
Re: What to do with the trunk?
by Henry Conceição
::
Rate this Message:
The Facilities/EventWiring and Facilities/Remoting contains the test cases of this facilities, but those facilities are embedded on the Windsor project. Maybe we should embedded those tests on the windsor or mk suite, dunno. Cheers, Henry Conceição 2009/10/26 Krzysztof Koźmic <krzysztof.kozmic@...>: > > +1 for removing it after MR release > > John Simons wrote: >> Now that all projects have been migrated into their own folders, what >> is the plan for the trunk? >> >> The trunk currently still has the following: >> - docs >> - Experiments >> - Samples >> - Setup >> - SharedLibs >> - Tools/VSNetWizards >> - Facilities/DynamicLoader >> - Facilities/EventWiring >> - Facilities/FactorySupport >> - Facilities/Remoting >> - Facilities/TypedFactory >> >> Should we wait for the MonoRail release and after that get rid of it? >> >> Cheers >> John >> > >> > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group. To post to this group, send email to castle-project-devel@... To unsubscribe from this group, send email to castle-project-devel+unsubscribe@... For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~--- |
|
|
Re: What to do with the trunk?
by Tuna Toksoz
::
Rate this Message:
Agreed, this is something i wanted to do, but didn't somehow.
Tuna Toksöz Eternal sunshine of the open source mind. http://devlicio.us/blogs/tuna_toksoz http://tunatoksoz.com http://twitter.com/tehlike 2009/10/26 Henry Conceição <henry.conceicao@...>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group. To post to this group, send email to castle-project-devel@... To unsubscribe from this group, send email to castle-project-devel+unsubscribe@... For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~--- |
|
|
Re: What to do with the trunk?
by John Simons
::
Rate this Message:
I can move them to Windsor, unless you want to do it Tuna ? On Oct 27, 8:28 am, Tuna Toksoz <tehl...@...> wrote: > Agreed, this is something i wanted to do, but didn't somehow. > > Tuna Toksöz > Eternal sunshine of the open source mind. > > http://devlicio.us/blogs/tuna_toksozhttp://tunatoksoz.comhttp://twitter.com/tehlike > > 2009/10/26 Henry Conceição <henry.concei...@...> > > > > > The Facilities/EventWiring and Facilities/Remoting contains the test > > cases of this facilities, but those facilities are embedded on the > > Windsor project. Maybe we should embedded those tests on the windsor > > or mk suite, dunno. > > > Cheers, > > Henry Conceição > > > 2009/10/26 Krzysztof Koźmic <krzysztof.koz...@...>: > > > > +1 for removing it after MR release > > > > John Simons wrote: > > >> Now that all projects have been migrated into their own folders, what > > >> is the plan for the trunk? > > > >> The trunk currently still has the following: > > >> - docs > > >> - Experiments > > >> - Samples > > >> - Setup > > >> - SharedLibs > > >> - Tools/VSNetWizards > > >> - Facilities/DynamicLoader > > >> - Facilities/EventWiring > > >> - Facilities/FactorySupport > > >> - Facilities/Remoting > > >> - Facilities/TypedFactory > > > >> Should we wait for the MonoRail release and after that get rid of it? > > > >> Cheers > > >> John You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group. To post to this group, send email to castle-project-devel@... To unsubscribe from this group, send email to castle-project-devel+unsubscribe@... For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~--- |
|
|
Re: What to do with the trunk?
by Tuna Toksoz
::
Rate this Message:
If you have time please do so, or leave it for a week until i am done with my NHF work.
Tuna Toksöz Eternal sunshine of the open source mind. http://devlicio.us/blogs/tuna_toksoz http://tunatoksoz.com http://twitter.com/tehlike On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 11:57 PM, John Simons <johnsimons007@...> wrote:
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group. To post to this group, send email to castle-project-devel@... To unsubscribe from this group, send email to castle-project-devel+unsubscribe@... For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~--- |
|
|
Re: What to do with the trunk?
by G. Richard Bellamy-2
::
Rate this Message:
Regarding the Samples, originally I was all for just removing them... but I've decide instead that it would be best to have something rather than nothing, and it's going to take some time to produce new ones.
I'll go through them one-by-one, and ensure they build and execute. If they don't build and run, and it's not trivial to fix them, I'll remove them. For the ones that remain, I'll be creating a new top-level area called /Samples, and within it will reside each of the current samples. They'll be setup to build using the new structure, although they'll use a different methodology for packaging, since it's the source that matters more than the executable (based on their category, e.g. all InversionOfControl samples will build into a single zip file, with source).
That way we've got Samples that at least execute against the current code. I'll be sending out another email requesting input from the community regarding the type of application would best suit as guidance for Castle.
- rb On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 3:00 PM, Tuna Toksoz <tehlike@...> wrote: If you have time please do so, or leave it for a week until i am done with my NHF work. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group. To post to this group, send email to castle-project-devel@... To unsubscribe from this group, send email to castle-project-devel+unsubscribe@... For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~--- |
|
|
Re: What to do with the trunk?
by John Simons
::
Rate this Message:
Richard, In regards to moving Samples out of the trunk, just be careful because the /site nant script builds these out of the /trunk/Samples as part of building the website. Cheers John On Oct 27, 9:26 am, "G. Richard Bellamy" <rbell...@...> wrote: > Regarding the Samples, originally I was all for just removing them... but > I've decide instead that it would be best to have something rather than > nothing, and it's going to take some time to produce new ones. > > I'll go through them one-by-one, and ensure they build and execute. If they > don't build and run, and it's not trivial to fix them, I'll remove them. > > For the ones that remain, I'll be creating a new top-level area called > /Samples, and within it will reside each of the current samples. They'll be > setup to build using the new structure, although they'll use a different > methodology for packaging, since it's the source that matters more than the > executable (based on their category, e.g. all InversionOfControl samples > will build into a single zip file, with source). > > That way we've got Samples that at least execute against the current code. > > I'll be sending out another email requesting input from the community > regarding the type of application would best suit as guidance for Castle. > > - rb > > On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 3:00 PM, Tuna Toksoz <tehl...@...> wrote: > > If you have time please do so, or leave it for a week until i am done with > > my NHF work. > > > Tuna Toksöz > > Eternal sunshine of the open source mind. > > >http://devlicio.us/blogs/tuna_toksoz > >http://tunatoksoz.com > >http://twitter.com/tehlike > > > On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 11:57 PM, John Simons <johnsimons...@...>wrote: > > >> I can move them to Windsor, unless you want to do it Tuna ? > > >> On Oct 27, 8:28 am, Tuna Toksoz <tehl...@...> wrote: > >> > Agreed, this is something i wanted to do, but didn't somehow. > > >> > Tuna Toksöz > >> > Eternal sunshine of the open source mind. > > >>http://devlicio.us/blogs/tuna_toksozhttp://tunatoksoz.comhttp://twitt... > > >> > 2009/10/26 Henry Conceição <henry.concei...@...> > > >> > > The Facilities/EventWiring and Facilities/Remoting contains the test > >> > > cases of this facilities, but those facilities are embedded on the > >> > > Windsor project. Maybe we should embedded those tests on the windsor > >> > > or mk suite, dunno. > > >> > > Cheers, > >> > > Henry Conceição > > >> > > 2009/10/26 Krzysztof Koźmic <krzysztof.koz...@...>: > > >> > > > +1 for removing it after MR release > > >> > > > John Simons wrote: > >> > > >> Now that all projects have been migrated into their own folders, > >> what > >> > > >> is the plan for the trunk? > > >> > > >> The trunk currently still has the following: > >> > > >> - docs > >> > > >> - Experiments > >> > > >> - Samples > >> > > >> - Setup > >> > > >> - SharedLibs > >> > > >> - Tools/VSNetWizards > >> > > >> - Facilities/DynamicLoader > >> > > >> - Facilities/EventWiring > >> > > >> - Facilities/FactorySupport > >> > > >> - Facilities/Remoting > >> > > >> - Facilities/TypedFactory > > >> > > >> Should we wait for the MonoRail release and after that get rid of > >> it? > > >> > > >> Cheers > >> > > >> John You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group. To post to this group, send email to castle-project-devel@... To unsubscribe from this group, send email to castle-project-devel+unsubscribe@... For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~--- |
|
|
RE: What to do with the trunk?
by G. Richard Bellamy-2
::
Rate this Message:
Yep. I'll be modifying the site build script. I'm also thinking that the sample file packages should be on Sourceforge... -----Original Message----- From: castle-project-devel@... [mailto:castle-project-devel@...] On Behalf Of John Simons Sent: Monday, October 26, 2009 4:29 PM To: Castle Project Development List Subject: Re: What to do with the trunk? Richard, In regards to moving Samples out of the trunk, just be careful because the /site nant script builds these out of the /trunk/Samples as part of building the website. Cheers John On Oct 27, 9:26 am, "G. Richard Bellamy" <rbell...@...> wrote: > Regarding the Samples, originally I was all for just removing them... but > I've decide instead that it would be best to have something rather than > nothing, and it's going to take some time to produce new ones. > > I'll go through them one-by-one, and ensure they build and execute. If they > don't build and run, and it's not trivial to fix them, I'll remove them. > > For the ones that remain, I'll be creating a new top-level area called > /Samples, and within it will reside each of the current samples. They'll be > setup to build using the new structure, although they'll use a different > methodology for packaging, since it's the source that matters more than the > executable (based on their category, e.g. all InversionOfControl samples > will build into a single zip file, with source). > > That way we've got Samples that at least execute against the current code. > > I'll be sending out another email requesting input from the community > regarding the type of application would best suit as guidance for Castle. > > - rb > > On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 3:00 PM, Tuna Toksoz <tehl...@...> wrote: > > If you have time please do so, or leave it for a week until i am done with > > my NHF work. > > > Tuna Toksöz > > Eternal sunshine of the open source mind. > > >http://devlicio.us/blogs/tuna_toksoz > >http://tunatoksoz.com > >http://twitter.com/tehlike > > > On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 11:57 PM, John Simons <johnsimons...@...>wrote: > > >> I can move them to Windsor, unless you want to do it Tuna ? > > >> On Oct 27, 8:28 am, Tuna Toksoz <tehl...@...> wrote: > >> > Agreed, this is something i wanted to do, but didn't somehow. > > >> > Tuna Toksöz > >> > Eternal sunshine of the open source mind. > > >>http://devlicio.us/blogs/tuna_toksozhttp://tunatoksoz.comhttp://twitt... > > >> > 2009/10/26 Henry Conceição <henry.concei...@...> > > >> > > The Facilities/EventWiring and Facilities/Remoting contains the test > >> > > cases of this facilities, but those facilities are embedded on the > >> > > Windsor project. Maybe we should embedded those tests on the windsor > >> > > or mk suite, dunno. > > >> > > Cheers, > >> > > Henry Conceição > > >> > > 2009/10/26 Krzysztof Koźmic <krzysztof.koz...@...>: > > >> > > > +1 for removing it after MR release > > >> > > > John Simons wrote: > >> > > >> Now that all projects have been migrated into their own folders, > >> what > >> > > >> is the plan for the trunk? > > >> > > >> The trunk currently still has the following: > >> > > >> - docs > >> > > >> - Experiments > >> > > >> - Samples > >> > > >> - Setup > >> > > >> - SharedLibs > >> > > >> - Tools/VSNetWizards > >> > > >> - Facilities/DynamicLoader > >> > > >> - Facilities/EventWiring > >> > > >> - Facilities/FactorySupport > >> > > >> - Facilities/Remoting > >> > > >> - Facilities/TypedFactory > > >> > > >> Should we wait for the MonoRail release and after that get rid of > >> it? > > >> > > >> Cheers > >> > > >> John --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group. To post to this group, send email to castle-project-devel@... To unsubscribe from this group, send email to castle-project-devel+unsubscribe@... For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~--- |
|
|
Re: What to do with the trunk?
by John Simons
::
Rate this Message:
I totally agree, specially now that Sample is a project on its own. but this also means changes to the website, to pages like - http://www.castleproject.org/monorail/gettingstarted/index.html On Oct 27, 1:34 pm, "G. Richard Bellamy" <rbell...@...> wrote: > Yep. I'll be modifying the site build script. > > I'm also thinking that the sample file packages should be on Sourceforge... > > -----Original Message----- > From: castle-project-devel@... [mailto:castle-project-devel@...] On Behalf Of John Simons > Sent: Monday, October 26, 2009 4:29 PM > To: Castle Project Development List > Subject: Re: What to do with the trunk? > > Richard, > In regards to moving Samples out of the trunk, just be careful because > the /site nant script builds these out of the /trunk/Samples as part > of building the website. > > Cheers > John > > On Oct 27, 9:26 am, "G. Richard Bellamy" <rbell...@...> > wrote: > > Regarding the Samples, originally I was all for just removing them... but > > I've decide instead that it would be best to have something rather than > > nothing, and it's going to take some time to produce new ones. > > > I'll go through them one-by-one, and ensure they build and execute. If they > > don't build and run, and it's not trivial to fix them, I'll remove them. > > > For the ones that remain, I'll be creating a new top-level area called > > /Samples, and within it will reside each of the current samples. They'll be > > setup to build using the new structure, although they'll use a different > > methodology for packaging, since it's the source that matters more than the > > executable (based on their category, e.g. all InversionOfControl samples > > will build into a single zip file, with source). > > > That way we've got Samples that at least execute against the current code. > > > I'll be sending out another email requesting input from the community > > regarding the type of application would best suit as guidance for Castle. > > > - rb > > > On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 3:00 PM, Tuna Toksoz <tehl...@...> wrote: > > > If you have time please do so, or leave it for a week until i am done with > > > my NHF work. > > > > Tuna Toksöz > > > Eternal sunshine of the open source mind. > > > >http://devlicio.us/blogs/tuna_toksoz > > >http://tunatoksoz.com > > >http://twitter.com/tehlike > > > > On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 11:57 PM, John Simons <johnsimons...@...>wrote: > > > >> I can move them to Windsor, unless you want to do it Tuna ? > > > >> On Oct 27, 8:28 am, Tuna Toksoz <tehl...@...> wrote: > > >> > Agreed, this is something i wanted to do, but didn't somehow. > > > >> > Tuna Toksöz > > >> > Eternal sunshine of the open source mind. > > > >>http://devlicio.us/blogs/tuna_toksozhttp://tunatoksoz.comhttp://twitt... > > > >> > 2009/10/26 Henry Conceição <henry.concei...@...> > > > >> > > The Facilities/EventWiring and Facilities/Remoting contains the test > > >> > > cases of this facilities, but those facilities are embedded on the > > >> > > Windsor project. Maybe we should embedded those tests on the windsor > > >> > > or mk suite, dunno. > > > >> > > Cheers, > > >> > > Henry Conceição > > > >> > > 2009/10/26 Krzysztof Koźmic <krzysztof.koz...@...>: > > > >> > > > +1 for removing it after MR release > > > >> > > > John Simons wrote: > > >> > > >> Now that all projects have been migrated into their own folders, > > >> what > > >> > > >> is the plan for the trunk? > > > >> > > >> The trunk currently still has the following: > > >> > > >> - docs > > >> > > >> - Experiments > > >> > > >> - Samples > > >> > > >> - Setup > > >> > > >> - SharedLibs > > >> > > >> - Tools/VSNetWizards > > >> > > >> - Facilities/DynamicLoader > > >> > > >> - Facilities/EventWiring > > >> > > >> - Facilities/FactorySupport > > >> > > >> - Facilities/Remoting > > >> > > >> - Facilities/TypedFactory > > > >> > > >> Should we wait for the MonoRail release and after that get rid of > > >> it? > > > >> > > >> Cheers > > >> > > >> John You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group. To post to this group, send email to castle-project-devel@... To unsubscribe from this group, send email to castle-project-devel+unsubscribe@... For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~--- |
|
|
Re: What to do with the trunk?
by John Simons
::
Rate this Message:
@Tuna, I didn't have time to do this, and I'm going away for a month where computer access is going to be very limited, so it's all yours, sorry! Cheers John On Oct 27, 9:00 am, Tuna Toksoz <tehl...@...> wrote: > If you have time please do so, or leave it for a week until i am done with > my NHF work. > > Tuna Toksöz > Eternal sunshine of the open source mind. > > http://devlicio.us/blogs/tuna_toksozhttp://tunatoksoz.comhttp://twitter.com/tehlike > > On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 11:57 PM, John Simons <johnsimons...@...>wrote: > > > > > I can move them to Windsor, unless you want to do it Tuna ? > > > On Oct 27, 8:28 am, Tuna Toksoz <tehl...@...> wrote: > > > Agreed, this is something i wanted to do, but didn't somehow. > > > > Tuna Toksöz > > > Eternal sunshine of the open source mind. > > >http://devlicio.us/blogs/tuna_toksozhttp://tunatoksoz.comhttp://twitt... > > > > 2009/10/26 Henry Conceição <henry.concei...@...> > > > > > The Facilities/EventWiring and Facilities/Remoting contains the test > > > > cases of this facilities, but those facilities are embedded on the > > > > Windsor project. Maybe we should embedded those tests on the windsor > > > > or mk suite, dunno. > > > > > Cheers, > > > > Henry Conceição > > > > > 2009/10/26 Krzysztof Koźmic <krzysztof.koz...@...>: > > > > > > +1 for removing it after MR release > > > > > > John Simons wrote: > > > > >> Now that all projects have been migrated into their own folders, > > what > > > > >> is the plan for the trunk? > > > > > >> The trunk currently still has the following: > > > > >> - docs > > > > >> - Experiments > > > > >> - Samples > > > > >> - Setup > > > > >> - SharedLibs > > > > >> - Tools/VSNetWizards > > > > >> - Facilities/DynamicLoader > > > > >> - Facilities/EventWiring > > > > >> - Facilities/FactorySupport > > > > >> - Facilities/Remoting > > > > >> - Facilities/TypedFactory > > > > > >> Should we wait for the MonoRail release and after that get rid of > > it? > > > > > >> Cheers > > > > >> John You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group. To post to this group, send email to castle-project-devel@... To unsubscribe from this group, send email to castle-project-devel+unsubscribe@... For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~--- |
| Free embeddable forum powered by Nabble | Forum Help |
