When is ROME 0.95 / 1.0 coming?
|
View:
New views
18 Messages
—
Rating Filter:
Alert me
|
 |
When is ROME 0.95 / 1.0 coming?
by Jeff Carty
::
Rate this Message:
Title says it all.
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... |
|
|
Re: When is ROME 0.95 / 1.0 coming?
by Alejandro Abdelnur-2
::
Rate this Message:
I would like to address the open issues before going for a 0.10 release.
Next week I will be able to spend some time on this. A On Jan 16, 2008 3:47 AM, Jeff Carty <jcarty@...> wrote: > Title says it all. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... |
|
|
Re: When is ROME 0.95 / 1.0 coming?
by icebofh
::
Rate this Message:
I'm all for a new release since there have been a bunch of changes since 0.9 (released a looong time ago) and it appears as if there arent really any showstopper issues. --j
|
|
|
Re: When is ROME 0.95 / 1.0 coming?
by Alejandro Abdelnur-2
::
Rate this Message:
I've pushed a few fixes a couple of weeks ago with the intention of
wrapping things up to do a new release as, as you said there are many fixes in CVS. There is one issue in rome core that I would like to address but I don't understand the bug, I've asked for comments but got nothing so far. https://rome.dev.java.net/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=88 After we decide on this one we could do a release. Thoughts. A On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 2:07 PM, icebofh <icebofh@...> wrote: > > > I'm all for a new release since there have been a bunch of changes since 0.9 > (released a looong time ago) > > and it appears as if there arent really any showstopper issues. > > --j > > > > > Alejandro Abdelnur-2 wrote: > > > > I would like to address the open issues before going for a 0.10 release. > > > > Next week I will be able to spend some time on this. > > > > A > > > > On Jan 16, 2008 3:47 AM, Jeff Carty <jcarty@...> wrote: > >> Title says it all. > >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... > >> > >> > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... > > > > > > > > -- > View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/When-is-ROME-0.95---1.0-coming--tp14863570p16978066.html > Sent from the Rome - Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... |
|
|
Re: When is ROME 0.95 / 1.0 coming?
by icebofh
::
Rate this Message:
I read that bug report and cant make heads or tails of it either.
If the reporter doesnt respond, you could always include in a subsequent release. Doesnt look like a showstopper bug in any case.
|
|
|
Re: When is ROME 0.95 / 1.0 coming?
by Alejandro Abdelnur-2
::
Rate this Message:
I think we have addressed all open issues on core.
What do people think about doing a new release, 0.10 ? A On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 7:23 PM, icebofh <icebofh@...> wrote: > > I read that bug report and cant make heads or tails of it either. > > If the reporter doesnt respond, you could always include in a subsequent > release. Doesnt look like a showstopper bug in any case. > > > Alejandro Abdelnur-2 wrote: >> >> I've pushed a few fixes a couple of weeks ago with the intention of >> wrapping things up to do a new release as, as you said there are many >> fixes in CVS. >> >> There is one issue in rome core that I would like to address but I >> don't understand the bug, I've asked for comments but got nothing so >> far. >> >> https://rome.dev.java.net/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=88 >> >> After we decide on this one we could do a release. >> >> Thoughts. >> >> A >> >> >> > > -- > View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/When-is-ROME-0.95---1.0-coming--tp14863570p16996468.html > Sent from the Rome - Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... |
|
|
Re: When is ROME 0.95 / 1.0 coming?
by Dave-401
::
Rate this Message:
On Sat, Jun 21, 2008 at 8:34 PM, Alejandro Abdelnur <tucu00@...> wrote:
> I think we have addressed all open issues on core. > > What do people think about doing a new release, 0.10 ? +1 to new release +1 to calling it ROME v1.0 - Dave --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... |
|
|
Re: When is ROME 0.95 / 1.0 coming?
by Joseph Ottinger
::
Rate this Message:
+1... and make sure maven has all of the artifacts, including the subprojects. :)
On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 11:09 AM, Dave <snoopdave@...> wrote: On Sat, Jun 21, 2008 at 8:34 PM, Alejandro Abdelnur <tucu00@...> wrote: -- Joseph B. Ottinger http://enigmastation.com Engineer, http://gigaspaces.com |
|
|
Re: When is ROME 0.95 / 1.0 coming?
by Alejandro Abdelnur-2
::
Rate this Message:
I would prefer not to call it v1.0 yet, rather v0.10.
A On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 8:30 AM, Joseph Ottinger <joeo@...> wrote: > +1... and make sure maven has all of the artifacts, including the > subprojects. :) > > On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 11:09 AM, Dave <snoopdave@...> wrote: >> >> On Sat, Jun 21, 2008 at 8:34 PM, Alejandro Abdelnur <tucu00@...> >> wrote: >> > I think we have addressed all open issues on core. >> > >> > What do people think about doing a new release, 0.10 ? >> >> +1 to new release >> >> +1 to calling it ROME v1.0 >> >> - Dave >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... >> > > > > -- > Joseph B. Ottinger > http://enigmastation.com > Engineer, http://gigaspaces.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... |
|
|
Re: When is ROME 0.95 / 1.0 coming?
by Dave-401
::
Rate this Message:
On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 12:40 PM, Alejandro Abdelnur <tucu00@...> wrote:
> I would prefer not to call it v1.0 yet, rather v0.10. I don't understand your reluctance to go to 1.0. ROME is basically complete, no? Are you trying to use the version numbers to indicate that ROME is alpha quality, unstable and not ready for production use? I don't think that is the case. Plus, going to 0.10 sounds like we're going backwards. I know how the version numbers work, but casual observers are going to see 0.10 and think we just made our first pre-alpha quality release. What does the community of ROME developers and users think? Is ROME ready to be called 1.0? - Dave --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... |
|
|
Re: When is ROME 0.95 / 1.0 coming?
by Joseph Ottinger
::
Rate this Message:
I think it *needs* to be 1.0.
On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 12:54 PM, Dave <snoopdave@...> wrote:
-- Joseph B. Ottinger http://enigmastation.com Engineer, http://gigaspaces.com |
|
|
Re: When is ROME 0.95 / 1.0 coming?
by Mark Woodman
::
Rate this Message:
On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 12:40 PM, Alejandro Abdelnur <tucu00@...> wrote:
> I would prefer not to call it v1.0 yet, rather v0.10. ROME 0.9 was released 30 months ago. If we can't call it 1.0, can we at least call it 1.0RC or something?
|
|
|
Re: When is ROME 0.95 / 1.0 coming?
by Joseph Ottinger
::
Rate this Message:
The more I think about it, though... I want to know more. What is 0.9 missing such that 1.0 has such a barrier before it? Is there a planned feature that takes.. a year to build, but nobody knows about?
I don't mean to sound flippant - such is certainly not my intent. But a 1.0 would be welcomed and long overdue. On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 5:10 PM, Mark Woodman <mark@...> wrote:
-- Joseph B. Ottinger http://enigmastation.com Engineer, http://gigaspaces.com |
|
|
Re: When is ROME 0.95 / 1.0 coming?
by Alejandro Abdelnur-2
::
Rate this Message:
alright, alright. Agreed, there is nothing missing that should be
there before 1.0. So I guess we can go for 1.0. A On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 4:35 PM, Joseph Ottinger <joeo@...> wrote: > The more I think about it, though... I want to know more. What is 0.9 > missing such that 1.0 has such a barrier before it? Is there a planned > feature that takes.. a year to build, but nobody knows about? > > I don't mean to sound flippant - such is certainly not my intent. But a 1.0 > would be welcomed and long overdue. > > On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 5:10 PM, Mark Woodman <mark@...> wrote: >> >> On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 12:40 PM, Alejandro Abdelnur <tucu00@...> >> wrote: >> > I would prefer not to call it v1.0 yet, rather v0.10. >> >> ROME 0.9 was released 30 months ago. If we can't call it 1.0, can we at >> least call it 1.0RC or something? >> >>> >>> >>> I don't understand your reluctance to go to 1.0. ROME is basically >>> complete, no? Are you trying to use the version numbers to indicate >>> that ROME is alpha quality, unstable and not ready for production use? >>> I don't think that is the case. >>> >>> Plus, going to 0.10 sounds like we're going backwards. I know how the >>> version numbers work, but casual observers are going to see 0.10 and >>> think we just made our first pre-alpha quality release. >>> >>> What does the community of ROME developers and users think? Is ROME >>> ready to be called 1.0? >>> >>> - Dave >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... >>> >> > > > > -- > Joseph B. Ottinger > http://enigmastation.com > Engineer, http://gigaspaces.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... |
|
|
Re: When is ROME 0.95 / 1.0 coming?
by Brian Collison
::
Rate this Message:
I'm glad I didn't have to add my two cents to the versioning discussion
(and still be pleased with the outcome) ;) I'm not sure how the releases of the subprojects are done, but I'd also like to see the patch I've requested on the content module to be included as well-- Issue 97-- a simple removal of a System.out.println call. Thanks, Brian Collison On Mon, 2008-06-23 at 11:18 -0700, Alejandro Abdelnur wrote: > alright, alright. Agreed, there is nothing missing that should be > there before 1.0. So I guess we can go for 1.0. > > A > > On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 4:35 PM, Joseph Ottinger <joeo@...> wrote: > > The more I think about it, though... I want to know more. What is 0.9 > > missing such that 1.0 has such a barrier before it? Is there a planned > > feature that takes.. a year to build, but nobody knows about? > > > > I don't mean to sound flippant - such is certainly not my intent. But a 1.0 > > would be welcomed and long overdue. > > > > On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 5:10 PM, Mark Woodman <mark@...> wrote: > >> > >> On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 12:40 PM, Alejandro Abdelnur <tucu00@...> > >> wrote: > >> > I would prefer not to call it v1.0 yet, rather v0.10. > >> > >> ROME 0.9 was released 30 months ago. If we can't call it 1.0, can we at > >> least call it 1.0RC or something? > >> > >>> > >>> > >>> I don't understand your reluctance to go to 1.0. ROME is basically > >>> complete, no? Are you trying to use the version numbers to indicate > >>> that ROME is alpha quality, unstable and not ready for production use? > >>> I don't think that is the case. > >>> > >>> Plus, going to 0.10 sounds like we're going backwards. I know how the > >>> version numbers work, but casual observers are going to see 0.10 and > >>> think we just made our first pre-alpha quality release. > >>> > >>> What does the community of ROME developers and users think? Is ROME > >>> ready to be called 1.0? > >>> > >>> - Dave > >>> > >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... > >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... > >>> > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > Joseph B. Ottinger > > http://enigmastation.com > > Engineer, http://gigaspaces.com > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... |
|
|
Re: When is ROME 0.95 / 1.0 coming?
by erlingwl
::
Rate this Message:
Great that you decided for 1.0! When will it be available?
- Erling On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 12:30 AM, Brian Collison <brian@...> wrote: > I'm glad I didn't have to add my two cents to the versioning discussion > (and still be pleased with the outcome) ;) > > I'm not sure how the releases of the subprojects are done, but I'd also > like to see the patch I've requested on the content module to be > included as well-- Issue 97-- a simple removal of a System.out.println > call. > > Thanks, > Brian Collison > > > On Mon, 2008-06-23 at 11:18 -0700, Alejandro Abdelnur wrote: >> alright, alright. Agreed, there is nothing missing that should be >> there before 1.0. So I guess we can go for 1.0. >> >> A >> >> On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 4:35 PM, Joseph Ottinger <joeo@...> wrote: >> > The more I think about it, though... I want to know more. What is 0.9 >> > missing such that 1.0 has such a barrier before it? Is there a planned >> > feature that takes.. a year to build, but nobody knows about? >> > >> > I don't mean to sound flippant - such is certainly not my intent. But a 1.0 >> > would be welcomed and long overdue. >> > >> > On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 5:10 PM, Mark Woodman <mark@...> wrote: >> >> >> >> On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 12:40 PM, Alejandro Abdelnur <tucu00@...> >> >> wrote: >> >> > I would prefer not to call it v1.0 yet, rather v0.10. >> >> >> >> ROME 0.9 was released 30 months ago. If we can't call it 1.0, can we at >> >> least call it 1.0RC or something? >> >> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> I don't understand your reluctance to go to 1.0. ROME is basically >> >>> complete, no? Are you trying to use the version numbers to indicate >> >>> that ROME is alpha quality, unstable and not ready for production use? >> >>> I don't think that is the case. >> >>> >> >>> Plus, going to 0.10 sounds like we're going backwards. I know how the >> >>> version numbers work, but casual observers are going to see 0.10 and >> >>> think we just made our first pre-alpha quality release. >> >>> >> >>> What does the community of ROME developers and users think? Is ROME >> >>> ready to be called 1.0? >> >>> >> >>> - Dave >> >>> >> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... >> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... >> >>> >> >> >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Joseph B. Ottinger >> > http://enigmastation.com >> > Engineer, http://gigaspaces.com >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... > > -- Med vennlig hilsen Erling Wegger Linde --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... |
|
|
Re: When is ROME 0.95 / 1.0 coming?
by Alejandro Abdelnur-2
::
Rate this Message:
Erling,
I'll try to take care of it this week. First there are a couple of emails from last week that I want to verify to see if there is a problem or not (one of them 'rome atom 1.0 output incomplete'). A On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 1:18 PM, Erling Wegger Linde <erlingwl@...> wrote: > Great that you decided for 1.0! When will it be available? > > - Erling > > On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 12:30 AM, Brian Collison > <brian@...> wrote: >> I'm glad I didn't have to add my two cents to the versioning discussion >> (and still be pleased with the outcome) ;) >> >> I'm not sure how the releases of the subprojects are done, but I'd also >> like to see the patch I've requested on the content module to be >> included as well-- Issue 97-- a simple removal of a System.out.println >> call. >> >> Thanks, >> Brian Collison >> >> >> On Mon, 2008-06-23 at 11:18 -0700, Alejandro Abdelnur wrote: >>> alright, alright. Agreed, there is nothing missing that should be >>> there before 1.0. So I guess we can go for 1.0. >>> >>> A >>> >>> On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 4:35 PM, Joseph Ottinger <joeo@...> wrote: >>> > The more I think about it, though... I want to know more. What is 0.9 >>> > missing such that 1.0 has such a barrier before it? Is there a planned >>> > feature that takes.. a year to build, but nobody knows about? >>> > >>> > I don't mean to sound flippant - such is certainly not my intent. But a 1.0 >>> > would be welcomed and long overdue. >>> > >>> > On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 5:10 PM, Mark Woodman <mark@...> wrote: >>> >> >>> >> On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 12:40 PM, Alejandro Abdelnur <tucu00@...> >>> >> wrote: >>> >> > I would prefer not to call it v1.0 yet, rather v0.10. >>> >> >>> >> ROME 0.9 was released 30 months ago. If we can't call it 1.0, can we at >>> >> least call it 1.0RC or something? >>> >> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> I don't understand your reluctance to go to 1.0. ROME is basically >>> >>> complete, no? Are you trying to use the version numbers to indicate >>> >>> that ROME is alpha quality, unstable and not ready for production use? >>> >>> I don't think that is the case. >>> >>> >>> >>> Plus, going to 0.10 sounds like we're going backwards. I know how the >>> >>> version numbers work, but casual observers are going to see 0.10 and >>> >>> think we just made our first pre-alpha quality release. >>> >>> >>> >>> What does the community of ROME developers and users think? Is ROME >>> >>> ready to be called 1.0? >>> >>> >>> >>> - Dave >>> >>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... >>> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... >>> >>> >>> >> >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > -- >>> > Joseph B. Ottinger >>> > http://enigmastation.com >>> > Engineer, http://gigaspaces.com >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... >>> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... >> >> > > > > -- > Med vennlig hilsen > Erling Wegger Linde > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... |
|
|
Re: When is ROME 0.95 / 1.0 coming?
by erlingwl
::
Rate this Message:
That's great! :D
On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 9:51 AM, Alejandro Abdelnur <tucu00@...> wrote: > Erling, > > I'll try to take care of it this week. > > First there are a couple of emails from last week that I want to > verify to see if there is a problem or not (one of them 'rome atom 1.0 > output incomplete'). > > A > > On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 1:18 PM, Erling Wegger Linde <erlingwl@...> wrote: >> Great that you decided for 1.0! When will it be available? >> >> - Erling >> >> On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 12:30 AM, Brian Collison >> <brian@...> wrote: >>> I'm glad I didn't have to add my two cents to the versioning discussion >>> (and still be pleased with the outcome) ;) >>> >>> I'm not sure how the releases of the subprojects are done, but I'd also >>> like to see the patch I've requested on the content module to be >>> included as well-- Issue 97-- a simple removal of a System.out.println >>> call. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Brian Collison >>> >>> >>> On Mon, 2008-06-23 at 11:18 -0700, Alejandro Abdelnur wrote: >>>> alright, alright. Agreed, there is nothing missing that should be >>>> there before 1.0. So I guess we can go for 1.0. >>>> >>>> A >>>> >>>> On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 4:35 PM, Joseph Ottinger <joeo@...> wrote: >>>> > The more I think about it, though... I want to know more. What is 0.9 >>>> > missing such that 1.0 has such a barrier before it? Is there a planned >>>> > feature that takes.. a year to build, but nobody knows about? >>>> > >>>> > I don't mean to sound flippant - such is certainly not my intent. But a 1.0 >>>> > would be welcomed and long overdue. >>>> > >>>> > On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 5:10 PM, Mark Woodman <mark@...> wrote: >>>> >> >>>> >> On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 12:40 PM, Alejandro Abdelnur <tucu00@...> >>>> >> wrote: >>>> >> > I would prefer not to call it v1.0 yet, rather v0.10. >>>> >> >>>> >> ROME 0.9 was released 30 months ago. If we can't call it 1.0, can we at >>>> >> least call it 1.0RC or something? >>>> >> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> I don't understand your reluctance to go to 1.0. ROME is basically >>>> >>> complete, no? Are you trying to use the version numbers to indicate >>>> >>> that ROME is alpha quality, unstable and not ready for production use? >>>> >>> I don't think that is the case. >>>> >>> >>>> >>> Plus, going to 0.10 sounds like we're going backwards. I know how the >>>> >>> version numbers work, but casual observers are going to see 0.10 and >>>> >>> think we just made our first pre-alpha quality release. >>>> >>> >>>> >>> What does the community of ROME developers and users think? Is ROME >>>> >>> ready to be called 1.0? >>>> >>> >>>> >>> - Dave >>>> >>> >>>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... >>>> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... >>>> >>> >>>> >> >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > -- >>>> > Joseph B. Ottinger >>>> > http://enigmastation.com >>>> > Engineer, http://gigaspaces.com >>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... >>>> >>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... >>> >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Med vennlig hilsen >> Erling Wegger Linde >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... >> >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... > > -- Med vennlig hilsen Erling Wegger Linde --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... |
| Free embeddable forum powered by Nabble | Forum Help |
