Why XFC should be revived ...

View: New views
3 Messages — Rating Filter:   Alert me  

Parent Message unknown Why XFC should be revived ...

by Xavier Otazu :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message


        ... and a reason why Jeff should return to maintain XFC:

http://www.murrayc.com/blog/permalink/2006/05/11/gtkmm-code-size/
(you may find this post also on Planet Gnome)


        They complian about the overhead that virtual methods introduce
into gtkmm class hierarchy. Jeff solved it in XFC.

        ... what a pity if XFC is abandoned ... :-(

Xavier

_______________________________________________
Xfc-dev mailing list
Xfc-dev@...
http://foo-projects.org/mailman/listinfo/xfc-dev

Re: Why XFC should be revived ...

by Erik Harrison :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

It would be a pity in more ways than one.

I hope Jeff is okay. He wouldn't be the first developer to take a long
break, if that's what it came to, and if it's more dire, I'm rooting
for him, whatever the trouble

On 5/11/06, Xavier Otazu <xotazu@...> wrote:

>
>         ... and a reason why Jeff should return to maintain XFC:
>
> http://www.murrayc.com/blog/permalink/2006/05/11/gtkmm-code-size/
> (you may find this post also on Planet Gnome)
>
>
>         They complian about the overhead that virtual methods introduce
> into gtkmm class hierarchy. Jeff solved it in XFC.
>
>         ... what a pity if XFC is abandoned ... :-(
>
> Xavier
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xfc-dev mailing list
> Xfc-dev@...
> http://foo-projects.org/mailman/listinfo/xfc-dev
>


--
Erik

"If Beethoven had been killed in a plane crash at the age of 22, it
would have changed the history of music... and of aviation."
_______________________________________________
Xfc-dev mailing list
Xfc-dev@...
http://foo-projects.org/mailman/listinfo/xfc-dev

Re: Why XFC should be revived ...

by Sylvain Vedrenne :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

Selon Erik Harrison <erikharrison@...>:

> It would be a pity in more ways than one.
>
> I hope Jeff is okay. He wouldn't be the first developer to take a long
> break, if that's what it came to, and if it's more dire, I'm rooting
> for him, whatever the trouble
>
> On 5/11/06, Xavier Otazu <xotazu@...> wrote:
> >
> >         ... and a reason why Jeff should return to maintain XFC:
> >
> > http://www.murrayc.com/blog/permalink/2006/05/11/gtkmm-code-size/
> > (you may find this post also on Planet Gnome)

Interesting link.

I'm expecting lots of great things to be done based on XFC,
starting with XFC-4.4 and stable packages of it for most distributions.
XFC and Jeff diserve a lot of success!

Will Jeff come back to continue XFC as leader,
or will he choose to contribute as expert developer?

Of course Jeff is free to do what he wants. At least I wish he could
give us a hint about his intentions...
But for the moment he's simply not around. :-(

Best Regards,
Sylvain.
--
GNU/Sylvain - http://sylvano.esperanto.free.fr/
_______________________________________________
Xfc-dev mailing list
Xfc-dev@...
http://foo-projects.org/mailman/listinfo/xfc-dev