On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 11:58:39AM -0700, Brion Vibber wrote:
> The way it _should_ be working is something like this:
>
> 1) There's a backend ("controller") class for performing edits. This has
> hook points for things like aborting or altering edits (spam checks,
> captcha, etc)
>
> 2) There's a frontend ("view") class for handling the HTML edit form.
> This has hook points for customizing the form output, checking custom
> input, and presenting UI for error conditions ("you hit spam!" or "you
> need to submit this extra form")
>
> 3) There's another frontend ("view") class for handling the API's edit
> interface. This _might_ also have hook points for handling special
> input/output and custom error formatting, though _ideally_ such stuff
> should be able to use existing I/O channels specified in the API (spam
> hit just raises an error conditions; captcha hits have an existing
> channel for saying "show this and respond to it").
>
>
> Currently the EditPage class mixes a fair chunk of backend and UI, as do
> the edit filter hooks for spam blacklisting, CAPTCHAs, etc, so it's a
> bit icky. There's been some refactoring in the course of creating the
> edit API (as there was much refactoring to Special:Userlogin when the
> API's login modules were being created), but it remains incomplete.
So the obvious followup question is: is there a plan to migrate the
front end to *use the API* to talk to the backend (which is the
preferred approach to such things anyway)?
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink
jra@...
Designer The Things I Think RFC 2100
Ashworth & Associates
http://baylink.pitas.com '87 e24
St Petersburg FL USA
http://photo.imageinc.us +1 727 647 1274
Those who cast the vote decide nothing.
Those who count the vote decide everything.
-- (Josef Stalin)
_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@...
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l