|
View:
New views
9 Messages
—
Rating Filter:
Alert me
|
|
|
Would you recon GNUmed suitable ...for veterinaries, animal health practitioners or hoof care
practitioners? I imagine that for the practitioners its functionality might mostly top the needs. What do you think? Would there be the possiblity to put the genus and spicies of the animal in a specific field? Maybe even the race? Would it be much adaption to implement that? Cheers Thiemo ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. _______________________________________________ Gnumed-devel mailing list Gnumed-devel@... http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnumed-devel |
|
|
Re: Would you recon GNUmed suitable ...On 2009-11-04, at 7:32 AM, Thiemo Kellner wrote:
> for veterinaries, animal health practitioners or hoof care > practitioners? I imagine that for the practitioners its > functionality might mostly top the needs. What do you think? Would > there be the possiblity to put the genus and spicies of the animal > in a specific field? Maybe even the race? Would it be much adaption > to implement that? Veterinarians caring for my animals often used what seem like "medical" records in which they enter the animal as a "person/patient" and, where the field would exist, would input the owner(s) as the "parents". I would suggest inputting the animal with the surname of the principal owner. The animal's own name(s) would go in the "first names" Suggest the owner name(s) be entered as aliases Suggest genus and species, as believed-to-be-objective, be entered in a SOAP notelet as their own inception "problem" and could be assigned a clin_when equal to the animal's date of birth if that would assist a logical sort order. I suggest the genus and species not be entered as a "Past History" item because that is not really what it is but have not fully thought that one through. GNUmed does not presently have a race field. I suppose we are here talking about biological information, like blood type. We do know that certain bio-ethnic groups are predisposed to certain conditions. In some sense these can be thought of as attributes that, in addition to helping to classify individuals based on "properties" may also serve as a type of measure of predisposition like a risk factor. Presently we have no special place for biologic attributes unless they would be the expression of a measurement. Same with habits... we will in 0.6 have "substances" as an abstraction of medications, but I think family history and risk factors are presently best managed as their own health issue with multiple clinically-relevant episodes within (despite that only one of those is allowed to be active at any one time). _______________________________________________ Gnumed-devel mailing list Gnumed-devel@... http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnumed-devel |
|
|
Re: Would you recon GNUmed suitable ...> for veterinaries, animal health practitioners or hoof care
> practitioners? I think it could work. > I imagine that for the practitioners its functionality > might mostly top the needs. What are those needs ? Can you give a short summary of what you think vets may need ? AFAIK pet vets often have quite (animal-)specific needs. Maybe we can get you a better answer if we know more. > What do you think? Would there be the > possiblity to put the genus and spicies of the animal in a specific > field? Maybe even the race? Would it be much adaption to implement that? It would be some work but not really that much. Karsten -- Jetzt kostenlos herunterladen: Internet Explorer 8 und Mozilla Firefox 3.5 - sicherer, schneller und einfacher! http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/chbrowser _______________________________________________ Gnumed-devel mailing list Gnumed-devel@... http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnumed-devel |
|
|
Re: Would you recon GNUmed suitable ...On Wed, Nov 04, 2009 at 08:25:00AM -0800, Jim Busser wrote:
> Veterinarians caring for my animals often used what seem like > "medical" records in which they enter the animal as a > "person/patient" and, where the field would exist, would input the > owner(s) as the "parents". > > I would suggest inputting the animal with the surname of the > principal owner. > > The animal's own name(s) would go in the "first names" > > Suggest the owner name(s) be entered as aliases Or as inactive alternate names. > Suggest genus and species, as believed-to-be-objective, be entered > in a SOAP notelet as their own inception "problem" and could be > assigned a clin_when equal to the animal's date of birth I would enter the date of birth of the animal into the normal date of birth field. I would then either use nickname or comment for race, genus, and species information. Karsten -- GPG key ID E4071346 @ wwwkeys.pgp.net E167 67FD A291 2BEA 73BD 4537 78B9 A9F9 E407 1346 _______________________________________________ Gnumed-devel mailing list Gnumed-devel@... http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnumed-devel |
|
|
Re: Would you recon GNUmed suitable ...Maybe a Fundamental Issue in all animals called "Genus/Sex" would suffice.
However my aproach would be FIRST NAME (translated as " Name / Owner ") - Chip / John and Susan Smith LAST NAME (translated as " Genus / Breed ") - Dog / German Shepperd SEX (doesn't need translation -- hurray!!) - Male And so on, I think it is just a matter of translating the creation applet for one's needs. This way if a Vet types "German"in the patient field he "should" be able to get a list of the German breed dogs, right? All this of course must be put to test or Karsten must say it would work ; ) Rogerio 2009/11/4 Karsten Hilbert <Karsten.Hilbert@...>
_______________________________________________ Gnumed-devel mailing list Gnumed-devel@... http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnumed-devel |
|
|
Re: Would you recon GNUmed suitable ...On 2009-11-04, at 3:33 PM, Rogerio Luz Coelho wrote: > SEX (doesn't need translation -- hurray!!) > - Male Do we need "neutered" as a a sex value in the main data bootstrap, or can users add these themselves? _______________________________________________ Gnumed-devel mailing list Gnumed-devel@... http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnumed-devel |
|
|
Re: Would you recon GNUmed suitable ...> > SEX (doesn't need translation -- hurray!!)
> > - Male > > Do we need "neutered" as a a sex value in the main data bootstrap, I do seem to remember we support "not applicable". Ah, dang, on second look no we don't. That should become a wishlist item: support "neutered" from any of m/f/h/tm/tf > or can users add these themselves? Not without some low-level effort. Karsten -- Jetzt kostenlos herunterladen: Internet Explorer 8 und Mozilla Firefox 3.5 - sicherer, schneller und einfacher! http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/chbrowser _______________________________________________ Gnumed-devel mailing list Gnumed-devel@... http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnumed-devel |
|
|
Re: Would you recon GNUmed suitable ...On Wed, Nov 04, 2009 at 09:33:10PM -0200, Rogerio Luz Coelho wrote:
> Maybe a Fundamental Issue in all animals called "Genus/Sex" would suffice. > > However my aproach would be > > FIRST NAME (translated as " Name / Owner ") > - Chip / John and Susan Smith > > LAST NAME (translated as " Genus / Breed ") > - Dog / German Shepperd > > SEX (doesn't need translation -- hurray!!) > - Male > > And so on, I think it is just a matter of translating the creation applet > for one's needs. > This way if a Vet types "German"in the patient field he "should" be able to > get a list of the German breed dogs, right? > > All this of course must be put to test or Karsten must say it would work ; ) I certainly think it would work but I believe it is MUCH better if you guys put it to the test !! :-) Karsten -- GPG key ID E4071346 @ wwwkeys.pgp.net E167 67FD A291 2BEA 73BD 4537 78B9 A9F9 E407 1346 _______________________________________________ Gnumed-devel mailing list Gnumed-devel@... http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnumed-devel |
|
|
Re: Would you recon GNUmed suitable ...On 2009-11-06, at 2:25 AM, Karsten Hilbert wrote: >> LAST NAME (translated as " Genus / Breed ") >> - Dog / German Shepperd >> >> SEX (doesn't need translation -- hurray!!) >> - Male >> >> And so on, I think it is just a matter of translating the creation >> applet >> for one's needs. >> This way if a Vet types "German"in the patient field he "should" be >> able to >> get a list of the German breed dogs, right? While this is true, a search for the single animal of interest would now result in many more matches and with many animals having the same first name (no different than people) it makes a need to always in a phone call ask the caller the breed of the animal in order to find it... the matches would be fewer when the last name was part of the search unless the same search efficiency is achieved inputting animal_name owner_surname despite that the above would both be stored in the first_names field I suppose it might be interesting for the staff to be shown (in the search results) listings of the kinds of animals in the praxis. But my other thought is that in normal daily work there is not a statistical interest in the details of the matches that were not the targeted record... GNUmed does support search queries through its SQL plugin _______________________________________________ Gnumed-devel mailing list Gnumed-devel@... http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnumed-devel |
| Free embeddable forum powered by Nabble | Forum Help |