XForms 1.1 is a W3C Recommendation
|
View:
New views
9 Messages
—
Rating Filter:
Alert me
|
 |
XForms 1.1 is a W3C Recommendation
by John Boyer
::
Rate this Message:
It's official, XForms 1.1 is a W3C Recommendation. See the www.w3.org main page now. Also, for W3C members, please see the announcement to the AC: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ac-members/2009OctDec/0025.html Congratulations to the Forms WG and the Forms community. Best regards, John M. Boyer, Ph.D. STSM, Interactive Documents and Web 2.0 Applications Chair, W3C Forms Working Group Workplace, Portal and Collaboration Software IBM Victoria Software Lab E-Mail: boyerj@... Blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/page/JohnBoyer Blog RSS feed: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/rss/JohnBoyer?flavor=rssdw |
||||||||||
|
|
XForms 1.1 is a W3C Recommendation
by T.V Raman
::
Rate this Message:
Congratulations Gang! John Boyer writes: |
||||||||||
|
|
Re: XForms 1.1 is a W3C Recommendation
by Sebastian Schnitzenbaumer-2
::
Rate this Message:
T.V Raman schrieb:
> Congratulations Gang! Yep! Thanks for doing a great job. All the best, - Sebastian |
||||||||||
|
|
RE: XForms 1.1 is a W3C Recommendation
by Philip Fennell-3
::
Rate this Message:
> It's official, XForms 1.1 is a W3C Recommendation.
Excellent news! Best regards and well done to everyone involved Philip Fennell Consultant Mark Logic www.marklogic.com E-mail: philip.fennell@... Mobile: +44 (0)7824 830 866 From: www-forms-request@... [mailto:www-forms-request@...] On Behalf Of John Boyer Sent: 20 October 2009 22:41 To: public-forms@...; www-forms@... Subject: XForms 1.1 is a W3C Recommendation Importance: High It's official, XForms 1.1 is a W3C Recommendation. See the www.w3.org main page now. Also, for W3C members, please see the announcement to the AC: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ac-members/2009OctDec/0025.html Congratulations to the Forms WG and the Forms community. Best regards, John M. Boyer, Ph.D. STSM, Interactive Documents and Web 2.0 Applications Chair, W3C Forms Working Group Workplace, Portal and Collaboration Software IBM Victoria Software Lab E-Mail: boyerj@... Blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/page/JohnBoyer Blog RSS feed: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/rss/JohnBoyer?flavor=rssdw |
||||||||||
|
|
Re: XForms 1.1 is a W3C Recommendation
by Kai-Uwe Behrmann
::
Rate this Message:
May I ask,
where is the reference implementation to XFORMS 1.1? kind regards Kai-Uwe Behrmann -- developing for colour management www.behrmann.name + www.oyranos.org Am 20.10.09, 14:41 -0700 schrieb John Boyer: > It's official, XForms 1.1 is a W3C Recommendation. > See the www.w3.org main page now. > > Also, for W3C members, please see the announcement to the AC: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ac-members/2009OctDec/0025.html > > Congratulations to the Forms WG and the Forms community. > > Best regards, > John M. Boyer, Ph.D. > STSM, Interactive Documents and Web 2.0 Applications > Chair, W3C Forms Working Group > Workplace, Portal and Collaboration Software > IBM Victoria Software Lab > E-Mail: boyerj@... > > Blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/page/JohnBoyer > Blog RSS feed: > http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/rss/JohnBoyer?flavor=rssdw > > |
||||||||||
|
|
Re: XForms 1.1 is a W3C Recommendation
by John Boyer
::
Rate this Message:
Advancement to W3C Proposed Recommendation(PR), which is the step before the one announced here that occurred in August, is supported by an implementation report containing results from numerous implementations. The implementation report link appears in the PR status section. A number of these implementations are open source projects. Cheers, John M. Boyer, Ph.D. STSM, Interactive Documents and Web 2.0 Applications Chair, W3C Forms Working Group Workplace, Portal and Collaboration Software IBM Victoria Software Lab E-Mail: boyerj@... Blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/page/JohnBoyer Blog RSS feed: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/rss/JohnBoyer?flavor=rssdw
May I ask, where is the reference implementation to XFORMS 1.1? kind regards Kai-Uwe Behrmann -- developing for colour management www.behrmann.name + www.oyranos.org Am 20.10.09, 14:41 -0700 schrieb John Boyer: > It's official, XForms 1.1 is a W3C Recommendation. > See the www.w3.org main page now. > > Also, for W3C members, please see the announcement to the AC: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ac-members/2009OctDec/0025.html > > Congratulations to the Forms WG and the Forms community. > > Best regards, > John M. Boyer, Ph.D. > STSM, Interactive Documents and Web 2.0 Applications > Chair, W3C Forms Working Group > Workplace, Portal and Collaboration Software > IBM Victoria Software Lab > E-Mail: boyerj@... > > Blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/page/JohnBoyer > Blog RSS feed: > http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/rss/JohnBoyer?flavor=rssdw > > |
||||||||||
|
|
Re: XForms 1.1 is a W3C Recommendation
by Scott Shattuck
::
Rate this Message:
While I applaud the work of the XForms group I have to note that none of the implementation reports appear to be without failures, some in areas I'd consider significant such as event dispatch and submission processing. So in fact, there do not appear to be any fully-compliant implementations of the 1.1 specification at this time. Is that correct?
ss On Oct 21, 2009, at 1:59 PM, John Boyer wrote:
|
||||||||||
|
|
Re: XForms 1.1 is a W3C Recommendation
by Joern Turner
::
Rate this Message:
Scott,
yes AFAIK you are right. But this does not mean that there are no mature and powerful implementations out there that have been proven in a lot of real-life projects. I agree that from an interoperability point of view we still have to do some work. On the other hand XForms 1.1 is such a big improvement over 1.0 that it's probably not astonishing that the implementers haven't addressed all new functionality yet. But be sure that we're working on it. For my part i can say that we're beyond 95% now and have automated the testsuite for regression testing. Stay tuned and i'm sure you'll see conformant processors in the public space within a few weeks or months from now. Probably it would be worth for the WG to think about doing less in one step. This would certainly make the implemeners life easier and probably lead to fully conformant processors in shorter time. But there was hardly a chance to do so for 1.1 as so many lessons-learned had to be addressed. Hope there will be a chance for 1.2 but in a world that ask for features features features ... Anyway i think the WG did fantastic work and XForms will have a bright future within the xml technology toolset AND it's definitely a technology you can use right now. Joern On Wednesday, October 21, 2009, Scott Shattuck <idearat@...> wrote: > While I applaud the work of the XForms group I have to note that none of the implementation reports appear to be without failures, some in areas I'd consider significant such as event dispatch and submission processing. So in fact, there do not appear to be any fully-compliant implementations of the 1.1 specification at this time. Is that correct? > > ss > > On Oct 21, 2009, at 1:59 PM, John Boyer wrote: > > > Advancement to W3C Proposed Recommendation(PR), > which is the step before the one announced here that occurred in August, > is supported by an implementation report containing results from numerous > implementations. The implementation report link appears in the PR > status section. A number of these implementations are open source > projects. > > > Cheers, > > John M. Boyer, Ph.D. > STSM, Interactive Documents and Web 2.0 Applications > Chair, W3C Forms Working Group > Workplace, Portal and Collaboration Software > IBM Victoria Software Lab > E-Mail: boyerj@... <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', 'boyerj@...');> > > Blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/page/JohnBoyer > Blog RSS feed: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/rss/JohnBoyer?flavor=rssdw > > > > > > > > From: > Kai-Uwe Behrmann <ku.b@... <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', 'ku.b@...');>> > > To: > John Boyer/CanWest/IBM@IBMCA > > Cc: > public-forms@... <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', 'public-forms@...');>, www-forms@... <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', 'www-forms@...');> > > Date: > 10/21/2009 12:31 PM > > Subject: > Re: XForms 1.1 is a W3C Recommendation > > > > > > May I ask, > where is the reference implementation to XFORMS 1.1? > > > kind regards > Kai-Uwe Behrmann > -- > developing for colour management > www.behrmann.name > + www.oyranos.org > > > Am 20.10.09, 14:41 -0700 schrieb John Boyer: >> It's official, XForms 1.1 is a W3C Recommendation. >> See the www.w3.org > main page now. >> >> Also, for W3C members, please see the announcement to the AC: >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ac-members/2009OctDec/0025.html >> >> Congratulations to the Forms WG and the Forms community. >> >> Best regards, >> John M. Boyer, Ph.D. >> STSM, Interactive Documents and Web 2.0 Applications >> Chair, W3C Forms Working Group >> Workplace, Portal and Collaboration Software >> IBM Victoria Software Lab >> E-Mail: boyerj@... <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', 'boyerj@...');> >> >> Blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/page/JohnBoyer >> Blog RSS feed: >> http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/rss/JohnBoyer?flavor=rssdw >> >> > > > > > > |
||||||||||
|
|
Re: XForms 1.1 is a W3C Recommendation
by Aaron Reed
::
Rate this Message:
Excellent! Thanks to everyone in the WG for all of your long hard work.
--Aaron John Boyer wrote: > > It's official, XForms 1.1 is a W3C Recommendation. > See the www.w3.org main page now. > > Also, for W3C members, please see the announcement to the AC: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ac-members/2009OctDec/0025.html > > Congratulations to the Forms WG and the Forms community. > > Best regards, > John M. Boyer, Ph.D. > STSM, Interactive Documents and Web 2.0 Applications > Chair, W3C Forms Working Group > Workplace, Portal and Collaboration Software > IBM Victoria Software Lab > E-Mail: boyerj@... > > Blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/page/JohnBoyer > Blog RSS feed: > http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/rss/JohnBoyer?flavor=rssdw > |
| Free embeddable forum powered by Nabble | Forum Help |
