XML-RPC update

View: New views
4 Messages — Rating Filter:   Alert me  

XML-RPC update

by Lars Schnoor :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

Hi

I was wondering if there soon will be an official release 3.1.3 of
XML-RPC? Since May I have been using a snapshot of 3.1.3.

Lars

Re: XML-RPC update

by Jochen Wiedmann :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 2:31 PM, Lars Schnoor<Lars.Schnoor@...> wrote:

> I was wondering if there soon will be an official release 3.1.3 of XML-RPC?
> Since May I have been using a snapshot of 3.1.3.

You are the first one to ask for, so I haven't seen any reson. Why
should there be any, in your opinion?



--
Base64 decoding, 300% faster than sun.misc.BASE64Decoder:
http://archive.netbsd.se/?ml=commons-dev&a=2008-05&t=7522166

Re: XML-RPC update

by Lars Schnoor :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

Hi Jochen

The reason I am using the snapshot is that the 3.1.2 version that I used
before ran into the deadlock problem (XMLRPC-168) which I believe would
be solved in an update? I noticed that I am not the only one running
into the deadlock problem, so I think that it would be a good idea to
get XML-RPC updated so that people avoid this possible deadlock problem
in the first place?

Lars

Jochen Wiedmann wrote:

> On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 2:31 PM, Lars Schnoor<Lars.Schnoor@...> wrote:
>
>  
>> I was wondering if there soon will be an official release 3.1.3 of XML-RPC?
>> Since May I have been using a snapshot of 3.1.3.
>>    
>
> You are the first one to ask for, so I haven't seen any reson. Why
> should there be any, in your opinion?
>
>
>
>  

Re: XML-RPC update

by Lars Schnoor :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

I guess my reasons aren't good enough?

Lars Schnoor wrote:

> Hi Jochen
>
> The reason I am using the snapshot is that the 3.1.2 version that I
> used before ran into the deadlock problem (XMLRPC-168) which I believe
> would be solved in an update? I noticed that I am not the only one
> running into the deadlock problem, so I think that it would be a good
> idea to get XML-RPC updated so that people avoid this possible
> deadlock problem in the first place?
>
> Lars
>
> Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 2:31 PM, Lars Schnoor<Lars.Schnoor@...>
>> wrote:
>>
>>  
>>> I was wondering if there soon will be an official release 3.1.3 of
>>> XML-RPC?
>>> Since May I have been using a snapshot of 3.1.3.
>>>    
>>
>> You are the first one to ask for, so I haven't seen any reson. Why
>> should there be any, in your opinion?
>>
>>
>>
>>  
>